Jump to content

American pimp arrested in northern Thailand was running Burmese sex ring on Facebook


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, sanemax said:

There are 13 pages of discerning comments

Sorry, but I beg to differ. Biased ones, for sure. From know-alls that know nothing. No facts in their possession. Only the headlines they are attracted to, subsequently home in on, and then decide, through arrogance, that they are well-positioned to judge every situation. Yourself being a prime example.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, mogandave said:

 


I don’t doubt his good intentions, but i think a prosecutor that reads this would call him as a witness.

 

Fair call

Posted
2 minutes ago, sanemax said:

I knew the guy and has a suspicion of what he was up to .

I questioned him numerous times about why he went to Tachilek so often .

Oh...well now. Everybody, please note! All of a sudden, this has become much more interesting. Sanemax admits knowing him! Woah! So, Sanemax, can you still deny what you have been saying is biased!

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, OzzyJohn said:

Oh...well now. Everybody, please note! All of a sudden, this has become much more interesting. Sanemax admits knowing him! Woah! So, Sanemax, can you still deny what you have been saying is biased!

That is my opinion and I had that same opinion BEFORE he got arrested

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, sanemax said:

That is my opinion and I had that same opinion BEFORE he got arrested

Prejudiced! You had an opinion. Before all this. Don't you think you might of mentioned that? And how many other 'contributors' are hiding similar stories?

 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted

As I suggested earlier within this post...a WITCH HUNT. Personal dislikes, maybe even vendettas. And this you people can call justice??? We all of us in our lives dislike many, and are similarly disliked. This is our nature. But using this forum to 'condemn' a person for our dislike of him...? What does that say about yourselves?

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted

 

Yet again, another 'contributor' claims they personally know something about this man. How can this possibly be perceived as an impartial forum?????????

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
Just now, OzzyJohn said:

 

Yet again, another 'contributor' claims they personally know something about this man. How can this possibly be perceived as an impartial forum?????????

The forum is tied into the nation so if you dislike that tabloid. Welcome to hell ozzy

Posted
3 minutes ago, sanemax said:

You signed up to TV yesterday and youve only posted in this thread about this case .

   What is you connection with him or this case ?

Are you Jim?

I signed up and posted only this thread, because I found it totally abhorrent that a pack of faceless expat wolves can collectively, without impunity, condemn a human being based on facts that not one of them is privy to! And 'no' Sanemax...I'm not 'Jim'

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, OzzyJohn said:

I signed up and posted only this thread, because I found it totally abhorrent that a pack of faceless expat wolves can collectively, without impunity, condemn a human being based on facts that not one of them is privy to! And 'no' Sanemax...I'm not 'Jim'

Are you saying that the whole story is complete fabrication ?

Posted
Just now, sanemax said:

Are you saying that the whole story is complete fabrication ?

No, I'm not. But there is too much vindictiveness on offer here, without anyone thinking about the wider picture. Consider the aspects of all this...the logistics of the 'sting' in particular. Please think laterally. Or at least, please just think.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
I signed up and posted only this thread, because I found it totally abhorrent that a pack of faceless expat wolves can collectively, without impunity, condemn a human being based on facts that not one of them is privy to! And 'no' Sanemax...I'm not 'Jim'

Does the qualify as “serious discussion” or is it just ranting? In any event, it adds nothing to the discussion.

I think you should start by outlining the ACTUAL FACTS as we know them and move ahead with a more productive conversation.

I for one welcome civilized, honest discourse.
  • Like 2
Posted

Off-topic posts removed.   Stay on topic or face a suspension, which will be given to one member now.

 

Posted
39 minutes ago, OzzyJohn said:

No, I'm not. But there is too much vindictiveness on offer here, without anyone thinking about the wider picture. Consider the aspects of all this...the logistics of the 'sting' in particular. Please think laterally. Or at least, please just think.

Regrettably OzzyJohn, it is a case of personal vendetta with a certain poster on this thread (it should be obvious who that is).  You should see his twitter posts over the last 24 hours.  :saai:

Posted
2 minutes ago, IslandLover said:

Regrettably OzzyJohn, it is a case of personal vendetta with a certain poster on this thread (it should be obvious who that is).  You should see his twitter posts over the last 24 hours.  :saai:

Is Jim posting on twitter (does he have internet access) ?

Posted
3 minutes ago, IslandLover said:

Regrettably OzzyJohn, it is a case of personal vendetta with a certain poster on this thread (it should be obvious who that is).  You should see his twitter posts over the last 24 hours.  :saai:

I don't doubt this. But...which one? Sadly there seem to be rather a few.

Posted
2 hours ago, Kadilo said:

All things aside I do think it's admirable that there are people like yourself around who are willing to help the likes of him. 

I dont see how he actually provided help beyond buying him a meal.

 

It seems more to me like he is trying to interject himself into the whole situation, for  whatever reason, by visiting a man he does not know in jail.

 

If the motive was truly altruistic i supect he might just have kept his charitable visit quiet, his posting here does not seem to aid the gentleman in jail in any way.

 

Paragraphing skills are sorely lacking as well.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, sanemax said:

Is Jim posting on twitter (does he have internet access) ?

Don't be so facetious.  I was not referring to 'Jim' and well you know.

Posted
1 minute ago, IslandLover said:

Don't be so facetious.  I was not referring to 'Jim' and well you know.

You stated "his twitter posts" without stating who you meant by "him" and I was just asking whether you were referring to Jim

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...