Jump to content

THAI ‘jumbo’ flight TG 679 skids off Suvarnabhumi runway while landing


Recommended Posts

Posted
6 hours ago, webfact said:

Photo credit : Twitter One's Way#YNWA @khongsak

that poster is in trouble...

(except if it is Prawit's grandnephew twice removed)

Posted
6 hours ago, Wiggy said:

No wonder they are losing so much money with only 97 passengers on a 747. Admittedly there could have been more on the outbound flight, but I doubt if it was the 400+ a 747 can hold, as it's too much of an imbalance. That said, it was a change of equipment from the usual 777.

Wonder how it is with planes from Europe?

Posted

Wish you people would stop  talking like this, my stewardess girlfriend of the time talked me into buying shares when THAI went public at B60 per share.Wonderful investment I must say--not.

Posted
28 minutes ago, hansnl said:

Wonder how it is with planes from Europe?

 

Usually, when I've flown from Europe to Bangkok the planes are quite full, but there are few people - certainly less than 100 - collecting luggage. Most are merely in transit and have no wish to spend time in the Land of Scowls.

Posted
6 hours ago, Wiggy said:

They bought 10 of them. The A340 was launched in 1993, but was followed in 1995 by the B777 which had similar range and payload but with only two engines, thus practically killing sales of the A340, of which only 378 were manufactured. Whereas more than 1,500 777s  have been delivered thus far.

Just saw the figures. There are bigger buyers than THAI

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Airbus_A340_operators

http://www.modernairliners.com/airbus-a340-orders-and-deliveries/

 

  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, MekkOne said:

must get them here, no matter what, we need Chinese.

 

Another incident to jolt Thai - Sino tourism relationships. Maybe the few passengers were not Chinese. They usually fly on Chinese Airlines.

Posted
56 minutes ago, newnative said:

  Any landing you can walk away from is a good landing.

I think that's what pilots say but I am not so sure these passengers would agree. 

I flew from BKK with Qantas a few years ago and did not realize we were on the ground at LHR until the brakes were applied - that is what I call a good landing. I felt it deserved an applause like in the old days but resisted. 

I still couldn't walk away though because of a broken leg courtesy of a Thai bus driver falling asleep.

Posted
7 hours ago, Wiggy said:

No wonder they are losing so much money with only 97 passengers on a 747. Admittedly there could have been more on the outbound flight, but I doubt if it was the 400+ a 747 can hold, as it's too much of an imbalance. That said, it was a change of equipment from the usual 777.

 

 

747-400 can accommodate 416 passengers in a typical three-class layout, 524 passengers in a typical two-class layout, or a maximum capacity of 660 passengers in a high–density one-class configuration 

Posted

The A340 is actually a great plane, designed for extra long haul.

I flew in it many times to Auckland, but under 14 hours not profitable

Thai used it on the New York  direct as did Singapore airlines, 

The only plane that could do the 17 hour flight at that time

At least 2 European airlines still fly them here.

EFTPOS made a 4 engine plane be able to fly straight whereas a 2 engine had restrictions making for flight deviations on route as 

having to be a certain distance from a suitable landing strip

  • Thanks 1
Posted
7 hours ago, lanista said:

97 passengers on a 747-400 from a major Chinese city ! Good indication that the Chinese really are pissed with the Land of Wicked Smiles.

How many Chinese did the TAT say were coming here this year?  12 million or was it 20 million before the ferry massacre and Chinese 'punch in face' deal at Swampy airport.

Thats a hell of alot of near empty 747's.

Most airlines dont even use those 4 engine planes anymore.

What do you expect for a Monday evening flight after a week long holiday in China?  I'm surprised there was 97 passengers.  <deleted> people on this forum are awful quick to come to judgement...

  • Like 1
Posted

For all you Thai bashers Emrites flew an A 380 from Dubai to Perth with 87 passengers on it last month (but OK as they get their fuel for free in Dubai ) making it not an even playing field

Posted
8 hours ago, Esso49 said:

Hand brake turns require skill to carry out correctly  ????

Give them a break, (perhaps a brake as well?), the runway was "slippy" as it had been raining.....apparently an unusual occurrence in Thailand.

Posted
18 minutes ago, Days Off said:

What do you expect for a Monday evening flight after a week long holiday in China?  I'm surprised there was 97 passengers.  <deleted> people on this forum are awful quick to come to judgement...

That's because the keyboard is so handy!  If we had to send a letter there would be no response at all.

Posted
8 hours ago, Wiggy said:

No wonder they are losing so much money with only 97 passengers on a 747. Admittedly there could have been more on the outbound flight, but I doubt if it was the 400+ a 747 can hold, as it's too much of an imbalance. That said, it was a change of equipment from the usual 777.

Well, 18 crew members is quite a lot for 97 passengers. Cancellations?

 

Don't forget that Thai Air takes in a lot of cargo. Maybe that's why they use these big planes on short hauls. Cargo is good biss. CNX-BKK is about 26 Baht/kg. 60 x 26=1560 Baht. So transporting people is costly.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
8 hours ago, lanista said:

97 passengers on a 747-400 from a major Chinese city ! Good indication that the Chinese really are pissed with the Land of Wicked Smiles.

How many Chinese did the TAT say were coming here this year?  12 million or was it 20 million before the ferry massacre and Chinese 'punch in face' deal at Swampy airport.

Thats a hell of alot of near empty 747's.

Most airlines dont even use those 4 engine planes anymore.

 

Didnt THAI get a good deal(scammed) in the 1990's with the French for Airbus A340's which had 4 engines? A disasterous plane that flopped with very few orders.

THAI bought many or most of them ..LOL

Well done THAI.

Stay classy.

Know what you talking about before you open your mouth. ThE Chinese Punch in the Face was NOT at Swampy it was Donmarang.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Slickrick said:

They have the same problem when driving a car.

almost! ... one involves runways, and the other - runaways

Posted

Thailand has finally roped in the Air to include into their accident comprehensiveness. Therefore, everywhere in this country is not safe now....LOL 

Posted
1 hour ago, atyclb said:

 

 

747-400 can accommodate 416 passengers in a typical three-class layout, 524 passengers in a typical two-class layout, or a maximum capacity of 660 passengers in a high–density one-class configuration 

A 747 flew a record 1,087 passengers back in 1991 on some sort of rescue flight carrying Ethiopian Jews to Israel.  Hard to believe they could get that many in. 

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...