Jump to content

My Experience Extending my Retirement "Visa" last Friday.


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, steve73 said:

Firstly to my bank to get the account verification letter and 3 month itemized statement

is this required where you are?  CW only requires the guarantee letter showing current balance along with the passbook.  i use a fixed account, with no transactions, so there are only 2 or 3 updates all with the same balance (unless interest added).  i have a separate savings to show money flow, but so far not asked.

 

2 hours ago, steve73 said:

Initially the 800k must be seasoned for 3 months (or 2 for a first extension of a non-Immigrant visa) prior to your extension. The account must then remain above 800k for 3 months following

i thought the new order directed 2 months prior and 3 months after for all applications.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, bkk6060 said:

I guess if one directly transfers their pension into a Thai bank, which is not the way to do it.

 

As long as it says ¨international transfer¨ into the Thai bank they are fine.

 

I use Chase bank.  My retirement payment goes into Chase on the first of every month.  Then I transfer it into Bangkok Bank when I want.  The transfer into Bangkok Bank reads ¨international transfer¨ and that is all they want to see.  

If you are using "ACH" transfer from Chase Bank  to Bangkok Bank you will no longer be able to use that method beginning 1 Apr 19 unless Chase uses ACH "IAT" format---and it highly, highly doubtful they use IAT format.  Now if you are using SWIFT then that will continue to work.  

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, ChouDoufu said:

is this required where you are?  CW only requires the guarantee letter showing current balance along with the passbook.  i use a fixed account, with no transactions, so there are only 2 or 3 updates all with the same balance (unless interest added).  i have a separate savings to show money flow, but so far not asked.

 

i thought the new order directed 2 months prior and 3 months after for all applications.

The developing consensus on here seems to be that it remains as before; 2+3 for first-time applications, 3+3for renewals.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, allane said:

The developing consensus on here seems to be that it remains as before; 2+3 for first-time applications, 3+3for renewals.

Best to ask BEFORE 3 months at ur local immigration that will do ur extension.

Phuket says 2 before, 3 after

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pib said:

 

 

I'm wondering if Thai banks will actually do this or this is just something immigration officers think should be easy to get.  Now, I'm sure it could be done but would require the bank to key in on select codes.  Guess we'll find out over the coming months are more after extension reports flow in.

 

And this is going to be a problem where pensions are "normally" posted to a person's account the first few days of every month but "occasionally due to weekends/holidays" a payment may be paid/post early.  So early you actually reflect two payments for that month and no payments for the following month. Like a U.S. social security payment on 3 Aug and another one on 31 Aug (the 31 Aug payment would normally occur on 3 Sep but 3 Sep/Mon was a US holiday preceded by the weekend so it was paid early).  This  periodically happens with various US govt benefit payments like U.S. social security,  military retirement, Veteran's Administration, etc.

 

I got the impression that Imm. knew what types of statement the banks could produce, that would best suit them.  Anyone considering using income (or combo) needs to discuss with their bank ahead of time to confirm this.

 

I wasn't aware that some regular payments could be a day or two early or late, so I hadn't framed my question towards that.  I'd asked specifically about quarterly pension payments, or ah-hoc payments like I do when the rate's look good, and both were a no-no. 

I would suggest anyone who has pensions that fall across month end discuss with your own Imm office, as I'm sure they could be a bit more flexible in that event, or failing that see if your pension provider can better sequence the payments.  You could get it paid into your foreign account and you sequence the transfers to suit, although this may entail slightly additional costs. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I forgot to ask about the interim rules for anyone who has only just started sending their required income to their Thai bank - sorry!"

 

I got many months before my next renewal so no drama  .. but I am assuming as the new rules officially start March 1st .. that my importing the required sum each month starting this March fulfils the rules. 

 

Previously income could be in home country. But Im from a fab 4 country.

 

I will have "only"  9 monthly imports. I believe some big boss .. maybe it was BJ said flexibility / lenience will be granted this first year but strict 12 months imports required in future.

 

But worrying a tiny bit I may get an IO on a bad day. I guess many will be in same position.

 

I know .. Im being an old woman "worrying" about it. ???????????????????????? But it got me thinking. 

 

Getting the question answered useful me thinks. Other officers wont have same ruling but good to follow what the "bleep" is supposed to / may happen.

 

Helpful OP.

Edited by PAWNEESE
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@ steve73,

   And by the way, excellent info you have given on your Friday extension/Q&A session with the immigration officer. 

   Wouldn't it be great if immigration would hold some briefings....say a two hour long Q&A session on date and time XYZ....open to the public.  But I expect they know that would turn into somewhat of a "complaint/you should have done it this way" session and Thais want to avoid any type of conflict/argument.

 

Cheers,

  Pib

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, lamyai3 said:

This whole business of retroactive denial of extension is so much more complicated than the system it replaced. What would happen for instance if someone was using the income method, and then perhaps due to a missed month or something decided three months prior to the next extension decided to import the 800k for seasoning. Would they be judged on the seasoning, plus the activity in the prior 9 months? Never in the past has an extension been granted or denied based on whether or not you stepped outside the lines on the previous year's extension. 

That a good example...real bucket of worms with the new rules.  Seems the way the rules are written there is little or no leeway....then it's up to each individual immigration office to possibly grant an exception.  

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, steve73 said:

Combination:

Again, what we expected. The total income, either with an embassy letter (if available) or deposited from overseas (with bank statement proof as above), but still requiring at least one deposit EVERY month (so not suitable for people who receive the pension quarterly - I specifically asked that). Plus a savings amount that when added to the total income was at least 800k.

She carefully explained that an example of 40k/month of income, i.e. 480/yr, would require a minimum of 320k in the bank for 3 months prior to the next extension and 3 months after, and a minimum for the rest of the year of 1/2 that figure, i.e 160k. This would require a 1 year (+) itemized bank statement showing the balance had not dropped below these, in addition to a bank statement showing just the international deposits during the past 12 months; (I may have misunderstood the need for 2 separate statements).

Thanks Steve,

Very much what I was told re the income and funds method, but slightly different for the combo method.

 

Interestingly, I was told using an example of 40K per month + 320K funds would have to be maintained throughout the year to total 800K annually. Only if the funds were greater than 320K could I withdraw down to that figure after the seasoning period.

 

Obviously your IO is following the funds rule of withdrawing 1/2 after the seasoning period, topping up again 3 months before the next extension. (Same as the 800K funds method)

However my IO interpret it as a combination of funds and income totalling 800K throughout the year.

 

The question is will this requirement be clarified, or will each office be allowed to use it's own interpretation.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Pib said:

 

 

I'm wondering if Thai banks will actually do this or this is just something immigration officers think should be easy to get.  Now, I'm sure it could be done but would require the bank to key in on select codes.  Guess we'll find out over the coming months are more after extension reports flow in.

 

And this is going to be a problem where pensions are "normally" posted to a person's account the first few days of every month but "occasionally due to weekends/holidays" a payment may be paid/post early.  So early you actually reflect two payments for that month and no payments for the following month. Like a U.S. social security payment on 3 Aug and another one on 31 Aug (the 31 Aug payment would normally occur on 3 Sep but 3 Sep/Mon was a US holiday preceded by the weekend so it was paid early).  This  periodically happens with various US govt benefit payments like U.S. social security,  military retirement, Veteran's Administration, etc.

 

My Social Security is paid on the 3rd Wednesday of the month. Regardless of the date. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Tanoshi said:

Thanks Steve,

Very much what I was told re the income and funds method, but slightly different for the combo method.

 

Interestingly, I was told using an example of 40K per month + 320K funds would have to be maintained throughout the year to total 800K annually. Only if the funds were greater than 320K could I withdraw down to that figure after the seasoning period.

 

Obviously your IO is following the funds rule of withdrawing 1/2 after the seasoning period, topping up again 3 months before the next extension. (Same as the 800K funds method)

However my IO interpret it as a combination of funds and income totalling 800K throughout the year.

 

The question is will this requirement be clarified, or will each office be allowed to use it's own interpretation.

 

Yes, there are at least 3 different interpretations floating about as to what has to remain unspent when.

 

This oine makes sense to me but the way the order was wrotten ("same as (4) above") left iot wide open tio alternative understandings. Some IOs are even saying that 400K must remain in the bank at all times even if it is more than needed to reach 800K. Others, that whatever amount is needed to equal 800K must be in the bank year round.

 

The whole amount for 3 months and half thereafter (or, put another way, income plus lump sum =800 for 3 months and then = 400 thereafter) seems a reasonable interpretation in that it mirrors the provisions for spending lump sum amounts under the 800K method. but I would not count on all -- or even most -- IOs understanding it this way.

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Longcut said:

My Social Security is paid on the 3rd Wednesday of the month. Regardless of the date. 

Which means your birth date is between the 11-20th of the month and when you started social security you did not have a Thailand address on file with SSA....maybe you do now. 

 

I do not know if when a person first starts SSA pension with a US address which means his payment will occur as shown in chart below, if he changes his address on file with the SSA to his Thailand address that the payment will change to the 3rd day of the month.  But if you start off with a foreign address when applying for social security your payment is the 3rd day of each month. 

 

And I do not know if you started off with a foreign address and was getting paid on the 3rd day of the month if you move back to the US and update you address with SSA then if your payment changes to the schedule shown below.

 

image.png.bb486b64eb4c0496ffe50e7f6b275b03.png

 

 

Edited by Pib
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I find the new rules straight forward for retirement extensions using "money in the bank" method. Anything involving "income" for those xpats from countries with embassies that can still use income letter....business as usual. For those who now need bank statements with codes and whatever. I wouldn't exclude possibility that some imm offices will say "stuff this, its all too hard".

"Sir, you no have letter from embassy.. You need 800/400k bank"

Don't throw rocks ...I'm just saying..

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1.  I assume you are reporting from Ma ta put/Rayong immigration office? 

2.  If you go to the bank a week in advance for a letter reflecting 12 months of a fixed deposit account and they give it to you that day (only two entries) how much does that cost and will immigration accept a letter a week in advance of the extension application?

Edited by marcusarelus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Below website talks the possibility of changing your Social Security "Disability" payment.  Disability payment is not to be confused with your Pension payment....two different animals. 

 

https://www.sapling.com/7641606/change-date-social-security-disability

 

But if the same possibility exists for a SS pension payment for a person with a foreign/Thailand address currently being paid on the 3rd day of the month due to his foreign/Thailand address, it's probably worth some research/asking SSA if his monthly payment can be changed to later in the month....it would probably fall under below chart.


 

image.png.526dc25eea93f6a5f8f28cc05cfe797b.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ubonjoe said:

The new rules allowing proof of income to be 65k or 40k (for marriage) being transferred into the country came into effect on December 21st when the order was issued. I am sure 9 months of transfers will be accepted.

Only the new rules for the 800k baht in the bank option go into effect in on March 1st.

I was told I will be expected to abide by the new rules for my next extension even though it was before March 1st...

This is worrying since NOBODY else who was extending while I was there (perhaps 20 or so) was told anything about these new rules by the Officers.

I realize that this topic has been done to death on Thai Visa, and in other places, but I'm pretty sure there will be a few who will fall between the cracks, simply get a new visa totally unaware of the changes.  I'm surprised that the Offices are not issuing a copy of the rules as they grant each new extension.. Perhaps they will from March 1st..?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, marcusarelus said:

1.  I assume you are reporting from Ma ta put/Rayong immigration office? 

2.  If you go to the bank a week in advance for a letter reflecting 12 months of a fixed deposit account and they give it to you that day (only two entries) how much does that cost and will immigration accept a letter a week in advance of the extension application?

I've always got my bank statement & letter on the morning I've applied for my extension, but I've been told it can a day or two old.  They have also wanted an up-to-date copy of the passbook, and you can do this yourself at many "ATM"s.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...