Jump to content

PM Johnson to reveal his final Brexit plan as early as Tuesday - Telegraph


webfact

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

Wasn't he foreign secretary not too long ago. Which great ideas did he contribute at that time?

he did, one of them was ..... we will not accept the back stop 555

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The plan is expected to be based on the creation of an all-Ireland "economic zone" which would allow agricultural and food products to move between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland without checks at the border, the report said.

 

So next to all the other questions. Boris wants to build the complete infrastructure for two new borders in 31 days?

How dumb is that?

 

Due to the temporal impossibility, that would mean a further postponement of the withdrawal date.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The plan is expected to be based on the creation of an all-Ireland "economic zone" which would allow agricultural and food products to move between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland without checks at the border, the report said.
 
So next to all the other questions. Boris wants to build the complete infrastructure for two new borders in 31 days?
How dumb is that?
 
Due to the temporal impossibility, that would mean a further postponement of the withdrawal date.
 
 


As i understand it, an agreed deal triggers the two year implementation/transition period so the have this time which is still probably not enough.


Sent from my iPad using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Libai said:

The EU has borders with Belarus, The Ukraine, Moldova, Turkey and Albania. Nobody is ever, ever, going to convince me that the Irish border, compared to all these others, is so problematic. It has been exploited purely for political reasons, to make Brexit as difficult, and irreversible, as is possible.

If a chlorinated US chicken is exported to N Ireland / UK, it can walk to Ireland and from there to the EU.

What will stop it?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

Please publish a link to any article about any of those ideas which Boris had and which were ignored.

Or did he have them only in secret in his head?

Are you saying that May and Robbins listened to anybody else but each other, seriously?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rookiescot said:

So what ideas did Johnson put forward that May ignored?

Remember when Boris urged Mrs May to chuck the chequers plan, and he himself "threw his weight behind a Super Canada Deal".

 

"And, in a 4,600-word essay published just before the Conservative conference gets underway in Birmingham, he called on the Prime Minister to push the EU for more time to avoid a hard border in Northern Ireland."

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

I don't know how much they listened.

But it's obvious that May was not able to bring up any good ideas to solve the Brexit mess.

Now imagine if Boris would have had any good ideas. Do you think he was too shy to talk about them? Or did he have so much respect for May that he didn't want to undermine her?

I am sure if he would have had any ideas to bring Brexit forward then he would not have hesitated to make them public. And in case he had any good idea then the public and his party would have been delighted to have a member with such good ideas.

Now why do you think all this did not happen?

It was clear when the EU came back with the figure for the divorce settlement and Johnson said "tell them they can whistle for it", just where he stood on leaving the EU.  He was always about leaving with no deal.  Then later when the ERG said that they had alternative proposals for an EU deal and failed to come up with anything.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

I don't know how much they listened.

But it's obvious that May was not able to bring up any good ideas to solve the Brexit mess.

Now imagine if Boris would have had any good ideas. Do you think he was too shy to talk about them? Or did he have so much respect for May that he didn't want to undermine her?

I am sure if he would have had any ideas to bring Brexit forward then he would not have hesitated to make them public. And in case he had any good idea then the public and his party would have been delighted to have a member with such good ideas.

Now why do you think all this did not happen?

I refer you to my post #44.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boris has been interviewed by 2 BBC outlets this morning but has understandably side-stepped ITV, presumably as a result of Peston's relationship with his latest accuser.

 

I quite like Piers Morgan but i'm not entirely sure this was fair but i'm looking fwd to their actual interview whenever that may be.

(The 'Rhubarb' brigade should note Robert Peston interviewed Boris last Weds before this blew up, or at least before we heard about it!)

 

Edit: It's worse that i thought:

 

Edited by evadgib
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

That the idea it might be a good idea to have a plan has at last dawned on Brexiteers is, I suppose, an improvement.

Spike Milligan once declared that "If you have a certificate showing that you're sane the last thing you should do it show it to anybody"

 

Think about it...

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Libai said:

The EU has borders with Belarus, The Ukraine, Moldova, Turkey and Albania. Nobody is ever, ever, going to convince me that the Irish border, compared to all these others, is so problematic. It has been exploited purely for political reasons, to make Brexit as difficult, and irreversible, as is possible.

The Irish want to avoid the same type of border the EU has with Ukraine, Moldova, Turkey and Albania, and want.. a 100% open border.

Time you learn SOMETHING of border crossings between countries.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Franko666 said:

No, that’s not going to happen, the EU is not only about trade, it’s a Globalistic socialist entity with an undemocratic core. 

The EU is a union of STATES.

Therefore it exists of: a EU council, with as members the heads of government of the EU member states.

Second: the EU Commission, existing of appointed members, each EU member state one.

Third: the EU Parliament, with all members elected in individual member states, e.g. 75 members by the British.

 

The UK has a two-houses Parliament: one with elected members, the other by appoited members. Never such a thing in the EU.

 

Edited by puipuitom
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Orac said:

So the answer to not having a hard border between Ireland and NI is to have two hard borders along with some DMZ/Twilight Zone between them where, I assume EU law applies.

 

Actually not a bad idea from a NI political point of view since  those border provinces are virtually all Sinn Fein so they will be able to act  as if it is now part of Ireland and it gives the DUP a stronger hand as it will make what is left of NI more predominantly Unionist and delay the looming demographic  issue they have. Maybe in a few years at this rate they will be down to just one or two counties.

Red = the future Northern Ireland ?

Green = new parts of the Irish rep 2020 sm.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...