Jump to content

Canadian diagnosed with brain tumour in Thailand has travel insurance declined because he had the flu a month ago


Recommended Posts

Posted

Canadian diagnosed with brain tumour in Thailand has travel insurance declined because he had the flu a month ago

Sean DavidsonMulti-Platform Writer, CTV News Toronto

 

image.jpg

Alex Witmer is fighting to get home after his travel insurance was declined because he told doctors he had a headache while suffering from the flu over a month ago. (Supplied)

 

TORONTO -- A Canadian man diagnosed with a massive brain tumour while travelling in Thailand is fighting to get home after his travel insurance was declined because he told doctors he had a headache while suffering from the flu over a month ago. 

 

Kitchener resident Alex Witmer and his wife Jennifer Witmer, who had been living in Moncton for the last five years, quit their jobs earlier this year and went on a six-week trip to Thailand before planning to relocate to Toronto. 

 

The couple was about a month into their trip when the 30-year-old began suffering from a severe migraine.

 

"He got a migraine that didn’t go away," Jennifer Witmer told CTV News Toronto from a hospital in the southern Thailand island of Koh Samui on Monday. "It just got bad."

 

Jennifer Witmer said they went to the hospital and were expecting to be given pain medication for the migraine. But after doctors completed scans they were told he had “massive tumour deep inside his brain” that was cancerous.

 

Full story: https://toronto.ctvnews.ca/canadian-diagnosed-with-brain-tumour-in-thailand-has-travel-insurance-declined-because-he-had-the-flu-a-month-ago-1.4722084

 

-- CTV NEWS 2019-12-10

  • Like 1
  • Heart-broken 14
Posted
46 minutes ago, ezzra said:

i'm not a big fan of insurance companies ways of doing business but there's some information missing from the OP...With all due sympathy here, not sure whether the insurance company should be liable for what is undoubtedly a pre existing condition, surely this massive tumor hasn't come about when he was traveling right?...

True.  Most insurance only cover emergencies and this is clearly a preexisting condition.   Sucks but true.

Best bet is to get insurance from your own country that has International coverage.  Cigna and Aetna are good in Thailand. 

Posted
12 minutes ago, The Farang said:

True.  Most insurance only cover emergencies and this is clearly a preexisting condition.   Sucks but true.

Best bet is to get insurance from your own country that has International coverage.  Cigna and Aetna are good in Thailand. 

Every ailment arises out of a preexisting condition. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

It’s little confusing . So he has travel insurance and insurance is refusing to pay for what? 
 

he is on holiday from my understanding for 6 weeks, now that he has been diagnosed.  He can still fly back to Canada ,

 

so insurance is refusing to pay for surgery in Thailand ? Or refusing to pay for what?

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, gk10002000 said:

The article topic is dead wrong.  He was reporting a headache a month ago, but it was most likely NOT due to having the flu.  He had brain cancer and the flu may just have made things more sensitive.  having said that, this just point out the junk insurance policies that may be coming from the Thai immigration directives.

We have a brain surgeon in our midst

Posted
4 minutes ago, kingdong said:

Why would you want to go on holiday to a third world country knowing you had a brain tumour?

An American acquaintance of mine knew he had terminal cancer with only a few weeks to live and insisted on flying from the West Coast in order to make a farewell tour. He was taken around in a wheelchair, forever <deleted>ting himself. It was an embarrassment to all he encountered but he didn't care

Posted
2 minutes ago, ThaiBunny said:

An American acquaintance of mine knew he had terminal cancer with only a few weeks to live and insisted on flying from the West Coast in order to make a farewell tour. He was taken around in a wheelchair, forever <deleted>ting himself. It was an embarrassment to all he encountered but he didn't care

Up to him.

Posted
9 minutes ago, kingdong said:

Why would you want to go on holiday to a third world country knowing you had a brain tumour?

Good point though it could also be a smoke screen getting insurance an other way. But its a good point. But Thailand has some good hospitals there could be more to this when meet the eye.


I don't think insurance companies are out to get us and my experience has been reasonable with them. But i can understand them investigating a claim like this one.

 

Anyway it looks like we just see one side.

  • Like 1
Posted
38 minutes ago, zydeco said:

All insurance is a scam. All of it. It's there for the companies to make a profit. They only make a profit if you pay more in than they pay out. Scam and cheat. Anything to assure that profit. 

That is not a scam its called risk pooling and statistics and of course they want to make a profit all businesses do. Risk pooling and insurance has been known to work nothing wrong with it at all. My opinion of course. 

 

But if you have the money do self insure it will be cheaper (or far more expensive if you do get sick)

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, ThaiBunny said:

An American acquaintance of mine knew he had terminal cancer with only a few weeks to live and insisted on flying from the West Coast in order to make a farewell tour. He was taken around in a wheelchair, forever <deleted>ting himself. It was an embarrassment to all he encountered but he didn't care

And you didn,t consider accompanying him and attending his accidental discharges?

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, SteveK said:

No, they are out to make money for themselves and their shareholders. Take in more from premiums than you pay out, very simple.

Yes of course, they are a company and want to make a profit. For that they risk pool and use statistics and hope they make a profit. But the idea that they just refuse claims offhand is stupid. I mean everyone has a car insurance and you don't hear people complain about that. 

  • Like 2
Posted

On the face of it the declinature looks a harsh one but without access to the policy wording and the claims file it is impossible to come up with a definitive yes or no as to whether the decision is correct or not.

 

A decent lawyer might be able to fight this case but it takes time. Allianz don't appear to have a maximum limit of liability for repatriation so they would be liable for the whole amount in the event an air ambulance is required. That's a big hit on their travel account but not a reason for denial.

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...