Jump to content

Porn star Ron Jeremy hit with 20 more sex charges, including 15 year-old


Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, moe666 said:

I have to ask, how can anyone think rape is ok, it is the same old excuse, the cloths you had on did it, you led him on, you should have know better than to hang out with him. 

Exactly! By all means do not look at them and realize how they feel or listen to what they say. For the a55hole5 of mankind a no means yes.

Posted
3 hours ago, Thailand said:

Despite the mask looks like all the <deleted> over the years has taken it's toll.

Too much hard livin'. Now to do some hard time.

Posted
18 minutes ago, Susco said:

 

 

May I suggest that all courts in the world are disbanded, because the most powerful court in the world, the TVF armchair judges, have issued their verdict already?

Suggest all you want...

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
59 minutes ago, nausea said:

Porn star accused of sex charges, you couldn't make this up. 

although the 15 year old is a different story - but of course did he know she was 15?

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Logosone said:

It's not of course, it's the result of militant feminist activists whipping up women into feminist action.

Oh, yes! i forgot I was talking to the old and demanding guard. No further discussion needed. I hope your woman/women listen to what your say, do as you wish and cook your food, Mr Master. ????

Edited by Matzzon
  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Logosone said:

Witness Linda Lovelace, who appeared in bestiality and golden shower films, and then found feminism and was a pawn of Andrea Dworkin for a long time, or Asa Akira in recent times

Did Linda Lovelace and Asa Akira make a feminist movie together ?

Posted
5 minutes ago, Logosone said:

You can't sue someone for defamation if you have no reputation to begin with

Where did you read in the law that female porn stars lost their right to having a reputation? Are you sure that it´s not just your personal view of things you are representing?

 

That is not relevant. it´s the evidence presented and what the jury believes in that is relevant. I am pretty sure that the jury is not only represented by women, right? Is it not that a jury must be united to give a verdict? Explain that little flaw in your poorly written philosophy.

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Posted
41 minutes ago, FlyingThai said:

Why is a 15 year old child at a party with known adult actors?

Do they check ID cards at private parties? Sure there were no drugs there either.

Probably guilty of some of it but not all now its a feeding frenzy on "The Hedgehog"

He should have hung it up 20 years ago and retired, to Thailand. 

 

Posted
13 minutes ago, CorpusChristie said:

Did Linda Lovelace and Asa Akira make a feminist movie together ?

They did not, but Linda Lovelace also famously claimed she was raped by a porn actor, her entire porn career, all the deep throat, bestiality and golden shower films, were all supposedly rapes at gun point, as she claimed in her book Ordeal, basically a fantastic tissue of lies that was contradicted by all witnesses but greatly promoted by Andrea Dworkin, Gloria Steinem and Catherine MacKinnon.

 

I remember being at university and laughing that these crazy feminists would argue rape in face of all the visual evidence. Little did I know they were laying the groundwork for the Meetoo era.

 

Of course Linda Lovelace's allegations of rape were thrown out at the time. That did not stop Andrea Dworkin et al peddling the Linda was raped stories.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

He'll probably get all former co-stars going metoo on him in hopes of scoring some cash off the old dog.

Edited by DrTuner
typo
Posted
Quote

If convicted as charged, Jeremy faces a possible maximum prison sentence of more than 250 years to life.

Every time I see these sentence possibilities I think how absolutely brainless and stupid the US so-called justice system is. Are these people idiots? 250 years in prison?????? Morons.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Tug said:

Jeesss what a randy old horn dog but what do women really expect if they are associating with a prolific sex addict a hand shake and a chaste kiss on the cheek lol

He bisexual.

 

you want him rape you? You like it?

 

ps. He so ugly. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Matzzon said:

Where did you read in the law that female porn stars lost their right to having a reputation? Are you sure that it´s not just your personal view of things you are representing?

 

That is not relevant. it´s the evidence presented and what the jury believes in that is relevant. I am pretty sure that the jury is not only represented by women, right? Is it not that a jury must be united to give a verdict? Explain that little flaw in your poorly written philosophy.

It's a well known defence in defamation cases, if the claimant had no reputation that could be harmed to begin with they are what's called "libel proof", they have no reputation that can be harmed and therefore can not bring a successful defamation claim. 

 

For example if one of the accusers of Ron Jeremy, Elle Hell, who has a video on a well known porn site entitled "Ripping a loud fart in Spandex shorts", were to sue someone for defamation it is virtually certain she would lose the case because her reputation is so poor that it is really almost impossible to harm it. She can bring a successful sexual assault claim though, even if she is all over a well known pornsite doing disgusting and unspeakable things, and selling herself on another porn site for fans.

 

Of course a jury also has men on it, but we all know a certain kind of male likes to kow-tow to domineering females, if 5 feminist women were to decide on guilty it is quite easy to see weak-willed males going along with them. 

 

Still having said that, the charges against Jeremy do look compelling. Of course one would have to be super-human to work surrounded by willing porn "workers" and not assume it's a free for all the way James Deen, Ron Jeremy and Stagliano were accused of doing.

 

Posted
5 hours ago, Matzzon said:

That´s not the question. The question is if dear Mr. Jeremy have alibi. Actually, he will need proof, as there is 17 accusations to one denial.

Can you remember what you did one night 16 years ago.  That's going to be a hard one to close especially if you were stone drunk at a party with everyone else who was stone drunk as well, with orgies occurring in every room.  Sorry sir I don't have an alibi but I am sure my <deleted> does.....  Well Mr. <deleted>, what's the Alibi, Well your honor all I can remember was I was in a dark wet hole.  Case dismissed due to a lack of DNA

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
5 hours ago, moe666 said:

I have to ask, how can anyone think rape is ok, it is the same old excuse, the cloths you had on did it, you led him on, you should have know better than to hang out with him. 

no, its rather that we cant see a motive for him,

but the woman lining up for economic compensation certainly do

Posted
12 minutes ago, ThailandRyan said:

Can you remember what you did one night 16 years ago.

If it involved a man with a foot long penis and also my bodily orifices , I do think that I probably would still be able to remember  

Posted
On 8/31/2020 at 4:21 PM, Thailand said:

Despite the mask looks like all the <deleted> over the years has taken it's toll.

 

He looks like he's well past his "used by" date --  unless someone's into "grandpa" porn.  :laugh:

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, CorpusChristie said:

If it involved a man with a foot long penis and also my bodily orifices , I do think that I probably would still be able to remember  

His Alibi, not hers.  I have forgotten how many consensual visits I have had and where over the years.  In fact I can not even remember names or faces of some of the women when I was in my 20's.

  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Matzzon said:

That´s not the question. The question is if dear Mr. Jeremy have alibi. Actually, he will need proof, as there is 17 accusations to one denial.

Silly me, and there was me thinking that in criminal cases the burden of proof was on the accuser to prove her allegations.

 

I see now that in fact the accused has to prove his innocence, I see you have internalised the new MeToo orders well, good boy.

  • Like 1
Posted
9 hours ago, pegman said:

250 years to life? The Americans like locking people up for several lifetimes it seems.

that prevents them for early release like in ...MOST OF THE WORLD...

 

home country of mine, few years for murder now ...

Posted
10 hours ago, webfact said:

 

Jeremy, 67, one of the biggest names in the adult film industry

in more ways than one ..

I seen one of his films yrs ago when he was pretending to be a patient at a dentist's .. let's just say it weren't his teeth getting pulled by the nurse .. 

 

Posted
10 hours ago, Tug said:

Jeesss what a randy old horn dog but what do women really expect if they are associating with a prolific sex addict a hand shake and a chaste kiss on the cheek lol

15 years old is not a woman.  If he has done that, you should not be  offering up excuses for him.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...