Jump to content

UK PM Johnson's Brexit 'brain' Cummings to leave Downing Street


Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:

 

Oh, so much misinformation dressed up as insight. 

Why would an independent Scotland fail to meet fiscal requirements?

Which countries would object to Scotland joining the EU? Note that the 'classic example' has been debunked so many times, you betray how little you know when you posit it. 

 

Tusk: EU would be enthusiastic if Scotland applied to rejoin

Spanish government confirms no EU veto for an independent Scotland

As far as I can see the consul Miguel Angel Vecino Quintana has been sacked for stating such a falsehood.

 

Your source:

"In a letter obtained from the newspaper 'The National', Spanish Consul General in Edinburgh, Miguel Angel Vecino Quintana confirms that Spain "will not block Scotland's entry into the European Union if independence is legally achieved."

 

From my link:

"One of Madrid’s top diplomats in Scotland has been fired after saying that Spain would not block an independent Scotland’s accession to the EU, according to Spanish media.

 

https://www.politico.eu/article/spain-fires-diplomat-in-scotland-over-eu-membership-letter/

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:

 

Oh, so much misinformation dressed up as insight. 

Why would an independent Scotland fail to meet fiscal requirements?

Which countries would object to Scotland joining the EU? Note that the 'classic example' has been debunked so many times, you betray how little you know when you posit it. 

 

Tusk: EU would be enthusiastic if Scotland applied to rejoin

Spanish government confirms no EU veto for an independent Scotland

Just one small example from the Tusk statement  you referenced above.(he has retired and has no voice remember)

 

Tusk said there were significant legal issues facing Scotland were it to become independent and seek readmission to the EU, as well as the diplomatic convention of not interfering in a state’s internal affairs.

The EU has been clear Scotland would need to apply afresh, alongside other applicants.

While he sympathised with Scotland’s plight, Tusk added: “At the same time, I have to respect … I know how important the word “sovereignty”, “integrity”, was in the debate in the United Kingdom. I think it’s not my role to intervene in [that] despite my sympathy. If you ask me about legal circumstances, we have to be here very cautious. We have our own treaties.

“Of course, you can always interpret treaties in very different ways. But if I understand well, the only justified interpretation is that if something like, you know, the independence of Scotland happens then we need a regular new process. There is no automaticity"

 

Scotland's own Financial Statements admit that Scotland cannot meet the current EU fiscal  requirement to join the EU.  Sturgeon keeps stating "re-join" something different and not now possible.

She has said on many occasions she wants an "independent Scotland inside the EU with Her Majesty as head of state and keeping the pound.  That is not independence and is not possible.  The BofE have stated very clearly that and Independent Scotland cannot keep the pound.  The EU say all new members  must join the Euro.  Checkmate!

  • Like 2
Posted
20 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:

Why would an independent Scotland fail to meet fiscal requirements?

From your same Tusk reference from your post (you either did not read it or chose to ignore the detail!)

 

Scotland would not be able to win back any of the concessions the UK had within the EU, such as less onerous VAT rules or exemption from the Schengen security treaty. Scotland would also be expected to rejoin the common fisheries policy – a system which boosted the pro-Brexit vote in Scottish fishing areas.

Scottish government data, which was released last week but not publicised, showed a £5bn cut in Scotland’s economic output from £180bn to £175bn, which is equivalent to a deficit of 7.2%. The deficit shows the gap between public spending and tax income. The EU requires its member states to have a deficit below 3%.

John McLaren, an economist, told the Sunday Times: “A £5bn – almost 3% – downwards revision in Scottish GDP has important implications for judging Scotland’s economic and fiscal standing, especially in terms of independence or full fiscal autonomy.”

  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, RuamRudy said:

Drop the deadweight that is the union, and the future will be very different. 

What dead weight that is the union?  Do you mean the deadweight that the Barnet Formula imposes on the total UK devolved budgets,  A major % of Scottish income is derived from it.  The devolved administrations are the deadweight in the UK.  

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:

 

Don't forget, the cost of being in the UK is factored into the above. Independence means the opportunity to ditch the fiscal regime of the UK and adopt one that suits Scotland. 

It is obvious you do you not understand the "Barnet Formula" , how it works and is applied?

Edited by fangless
Posted
4 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:

 

I do, but do you?

 

You obviously do not know how it works or you would not have made this asinine comment "ditch the fiscal regime of the UK and adopt one that suits Scotland. "  Scotland without the Barnet devolved funding would be so much poorer as to beggar belief!

Posted
6 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:

Virtually all Scottish income is derived from it with the exception of a minor amount of revenue generated from tax varying powers.

Thank you.  The rest of your post is  convoluted and spurious!
The Office for National Statistics has produced data on surplus/deficit per person - ie the gap between what is raised in revenues and what is spent.

On that measure, Northern Ireland had the highest net fiscal deficit per head, at £4,978, in 2018-2019, followed by:

Wales at £4,289
Scotland at £2,713
England at £68
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-ireland-38077948

Posted
5 hours ago, JonnyF said:

 

You might do? ????

 

There's no need to keep up this pretense. We both know that's not what the Scottish Nationalists want. You'd rather be ruled by Brussels than Westminster. Simple as that. You'll be begging them to let you in. And beg you most certainly will, given their rules on government deficit (below 3% of GDP) and government debt below 60%, both of which you will fail by some distance.

 

It's ironic that you criticize Brexiteers for truly wanting Independence and sovereignty for the UK. At the same time you pretend to want the same for Scotland while secretly dreaming of being lorded over by the EU Commission. 

Scotland has no debt. 

The UK has debt but none of it is in Scotlands name.

So if, by your logic, we simply say "Stick your debt" we will already be well on our way to satisfying the EU's requirements for joining.

 

????

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, fangless said:

Thank you.  The rest of your post is  convoluted and spurious!
The Office for National Statistics has produced data on surplus/deficit per person - ie the gap between what is raised in revenues and what is spent.

On that measure, Northern Ireland had the highest net fiscal deficit per head, at £4,978, in 2018-2019, followed by:

Wales at £4,289
Scotland at £2,713
England at £68
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-ireland-38077948

 

Convoluted? If you cannot follow a simple narrative, I cannot help you there.

Spurious? In what way?

  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:

but there is a more appropriate place for it. 

Agreed.

I was pointed to a particular post by a friend and had not realised the thread's tile.  Sorry we hijacked it

  • Like 2
Posted
3 hours ago, Rookiescot said:

My great grandfather was also in the trenches

Primary school playground arguments/comparisons!  My daddy is bigger/better than.........

Why don't you all grow up and stick to facts? 

That's  if any of you know them!

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, Rookiescot said:

Scotland has no debt. 

The UK has debt but none of it is in Scotlands name.

So if, by your logic, we simply say "Stick your debt" we will already be well on our way to satisfying the EU's requirements for joining.

 

????

 

Bless. 

 

Who do you think is paying for the furlough scheme, and bailouts during lockdown? Put it this way, Scotlands GDP without North Sea Oil is miniscule compared to the massive bailout it's been taking. 

 

Scotland at the moment have the best of both worlds. They get to make their own rules, all whilst having the safety net of a big brother if anything goes wrong, not having to worry about defense, security, etc. Having independence, borders, no guarentee they will join EU (Spain and other countries will object), losing the currency, defence, military, is just the stuff of fairy cakes. 

 

And the case for another referendum because we are leaving a trading block? Give me a break. You can't just have referendums every few years. 

 

If the British government refuse to give them one, what can they do ? They've already had one.  

 

It's in the Torys's interests the SNP are kept propped up. Without them the votes would naturally go to Labour. Hence why they always tease us with this nonsnese. 

Edited by AmySeeker
  • Like 2
Posted
6 hours ago, AmySeeker said:

 

Bless. 

 

Who do you think is paying for the furlough scheme, and bailouts during lockdown? Put it this way, Scotlands GDP without North Sea Oil is miniscule compared to the massive bailout it's been taking. 

 

Scotland at the moment have the best of both worlds. They get to make their own rules, all whilst having the safety net of a big brother if anything goes wrong, not having to worry about defense, security, etc. Having independence, borders, no guarentee they will join EU (Spain and other countries will object), losing the currency, defence, military, is just the stuff of fairy cakes. 

 

And the case for another referendum because we are leaving a trading block? Give me a break. You can't just have referendums every few years. 

 

If the British government refuse to give them one, what can they do ? They've already had one.  

 

It's in the Torys's interests the SNP are kept propped up. Without them the votes would naturally go to Labour. Hence why they always tease us with this nonsnese. 

What’s this ‘Defense’ you are referring to?

 

Scotland’s contribution to the defense of the U.K. is beyond question.

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
6 hours ago, AmySeeker said:

 

Bless. 

 

Who do you think is paying for the furlough scheme, and bailouts during lockdown? Put it this way, Scotlands GDP without North Sea Oil is miniscule compared to the massive bailout it's been taking. 

 

Scotland at the moment have the best of both worlds. They get to make their own rules, all whilst having the safety net of a big brother if anything goes wrong, not having to worry about defense, security, etc. Having independence, borders, no guarentee they will join EU (Spain and other countries will object), losing the currency, defence, military, is just the stuff of fairy cakes. 

 

And the case for another referendum because we are leaving a trading block? Give me a break. You can't just have referendums every few years. 

 

If the British government refuse to give them one, what can they do ? They've already had one.  

 

It's in the Torys's interests the SNP are kept propped up. Without them the votes would naturally go to Labour. Hence why they always tease us with this nonsnese. 

 

Where to start with this.

Its the Bank of England which is paying for the furlough. Sunak had to borrow the money for it. The UK currently has a debt to 2 trillion pounds but here you are telling us that Scotland could not manage its own finances ????

 

Not having to worry about defense? Perhaps you can list who exactly would be looking to invade Scotland? Upon independence Scotland would be entitled to a per population share of all UK assets. This means we would be getting things like ships, aircraft and tanks. All the stuff we would need for our own defense force.

 

Spain has said it would not block Scotland from joining the EU.

 

You cannot stop Scotland using the pound. Its a fiat currency. Indeed you would not want Scotland to stop using the pound because if and when we do it will lose about 10% of its value overnight.

 

There is no timescale for when referendums can be held. None. We should have another one because the majority in Scotland want one. Its the democratic will of the people. Its democracy. 

 

Ironically if you had given us a referendum 2 years ago unionists may very well have won but its the refusal to give a section 30 and Brexit which is driving up support for independence. The need for a section 30 is currently being examined by the Scottish courts to see if its even required. 

 

You seriously need to get up to speed on whats happing in Scotland.

 

 

 

  • Thanks 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...