Jump to content

Thailand: No plans to return tourism to pre-COVID crisis levels


webfact

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Liverpoolfan said:

A friend of mine was booked in for Thailand this January, now he says he’s going to North Korea instead. More friendly and easier to get in ????

Ummm....easier to get into Thailand for sure....

 

https://www.worldnomads.com/travel-safety/eastern-asia/north-korea/north-korea-travel-tips

All international air and train routes have been temporarily suspended since 31 January, 2020. Passengers traveling for tourism purposes are not allowed to enter. Foreigners who have arrived from virus-affected countries are subject to a 30-day period of quarantine and medical supervision.

 

Tours to North Korea have been suspended until further notice. Check with your travel provider to see what this means for you.

 

There is a serious lack of reliable information on the COVID-19 situation in North Korea, and it is virtually impossible to prove or disprove any claims.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SCOTT FITZGERSLD said:

it is all about saving face and looking smart in the eyes of the desperate people.

tourism all over the world is not going to recover for the next 3-4 years.

they know it so they will say - ohh no worry, it is all part of the plan.

problem is that thailand is allready invested heavily in tourism.

there are 2000 shopping malls in bangkok alone, most of them serve and survive

on tourists. now without tourists many of those shopping malls will collapse,

very big problem for thai economy and japanese investors.

I agree....It seems to hardly shock or amaze anyone how many shopping malls there are in Bangkok.......On Sukhumvit its almost mall after mall after mall.....And they are constantly building more all the time......Tourist or no tourist Bangkok is overrun  with shopping malls.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Disparate Dan said:

story bears no resemblance of course to this one from 2 weeks ago:

 

Yes.  And, both articles boil down to the goal of having Thailand be less dependent on tourism.  That does not mean limiting tourists in any way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but thailand has only 11.9% of gdp from an international tourism. The rest  6% is domestic tourism.

that's why the government is giving extra holidays to boost this sector.

Sadly, nothing will work, because people don't have disposable income.

International tourism will be from asia, a few h flight distance.

There won't be intercontinental tourism because of high airfares, so  mass tourism won't take off.

Still, medical tourism, pensioners coming for extended time in winter would be coming as before.

Thailand should remove visa restrictions, so chinese, indians don't have to worry about consulates, visa agents or even being stacked in visa on arrival office

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Jeffr2 said:

Ummm....easier to get into Thailand for sure....

 

https://www.worldnomads.com/travel-safety/eastern-asia/north-korea/north-korea-travel-tips

All international air and train routes have been temporarily suspended since 31 January, 2020. Passengers traveling for tourism purposes are not allowed to enter. Foreigners who have arrived from virus-affected countries are subject to a 30-day period of quarantine and medical supervision.

 

Tours to North Korea have been suspended until further notice. Check with your travel provider to see what this means for you.

 

There is a serious lack of reliable information on the COVID-19 situation in North Korea, and it is virtually impossible to prove or disprove any claims.

 

Swoooooooosh. 

That's the sound of sarcasm flying by. 

????

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Disparate Dan said:

story bears no resemblance of course to this one from 2 weeks ago:

 

 

I don't believe they've just switched policy or that the article you've posted is all that different to this one. They've been going back and forth on this for months already.

 

The Bangkok Post and other MSM papers are talking about pushing the return of international tourism virtually every day, while every once in a while someone like this guy says they want to start depending LESS on tourism.

 

I don't know what to make of any of this. Constant contradictions.

 

However, one thing I will say is this: I think all they need to do is attract inbound investment and promote tourism less. People will come once they're allowed to, and I don't think that once things return to normality they will actively try to dissuade tourists, because all they really need to do is stop marketing the country. It's as simple as that. What they want to achieve is tourism making up say 5-10% of GDP irrespective of the numbers that come, rather than 20%. Vietnam has a growing tourism industry and most westerners will instantly think of tourism when it comes to Vietnam just like they do with Thailand, but Vietnam is about as dependent on tourism now (pre-Covid) as Thailand was 15 years ago. Only 7% of Vietnamese GDP comes from tourism, though it's unclear whether that figure includes all tourism or only international arrivals.

 

Previously, no one visited Myanmar because there was no marketing of the country. Of course, perceptions of human rights abuses and being relatively restricted also contributed to that, but what really pushed tourism in that country since 2012 aside from opening up more was marketing. Although not nearly to the extent of Thailand and even pre-Covid, 30% of the country remained restricted to foreigners due to security concerns. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.







×
×
  • Create New...