Jump to content

COVID may have taken 'convoluted path' to Wuhan, WHO team leader says


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, rabas said:

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, Lol.

 

And how would he know?  Kindly tell me the scientific reasoning.

 

They just got there, can't possibly have learned much or analysed anything. Yet, they state, as fact, the one thing the Chinese CCP party desperately wants the world to believe.

 

No. They don't know that.

 

 

Ok, I was just casually looking for an expert in this field to ask some questions I have. 

 

What is the explanation of this?

 

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-spain-science-idUSKBN23X2HQ

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-53106444

Edited by ctxa
  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, rabas said:

I found the paper you did not reference. They used ordinary PCR testing and found 1, just one single sample, in March 12, 2019. All other samples came out negative, they said. No more until early 2020. Oops.

 

PCR does not find whole genomes, it looks for tiny pieces. Right now the world repeats millions of PCR tests because of their lack of reliability.  Worse, they didn't find all the pieces they should have, they found only 2 of 5.  The other 3 should have been even easier.  See the comments section.

 

The  pieces they look for are 18 bases long. The genome is 29800 bases long.  This is one of the pieces they look for called P2   CTCCCTTTGTTGTGTTGT

 

Here is the preprint,

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.06.13.20129627v1.full-text

 

Exactly, nothing to do with antigen/antibody testing. And the fact that PCR doesn't look for the entire genome of the virus, anyone with high school biology knowledge should be very well aware of it. 

 

However you do mention PCR tests lack reliability? Then what is reliable according to you? ELISA? Serology? ???? I suggest you go back to studying basic science concepts, even though you claim to know much about it. 

 

And yes, despite the many mistakes you make while trying to provide data to support your argument, it is still a valid argument. Because clearly, like the article mentions and like I never denied,  that is not for certain. But up to this point you still haven't said anything about the Italy article., instead you keep using (mostly incorect) arguments to prove something that I never denied, lol. 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
11 hours ago, Tropicalevo said:

And the cheque is in the post comrade.

So it wasn't a false flag attack by the religion of peace crew in retaliation for whats happening with the weega? 

Posted
12 hours ago, rabas said:

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, Lol.

 

And how would he know?  Kindly tell me the scientific reasoning.

 

They just got there, can't possibly have learned much or analysed anything. Yet, they state, as fact, the one thing the Chinese CCP party desperately wants the world to believe.

 

No. They don't know that.

 

Brown envelopes speak volumes ......................LOL 

Posted
8 hours ago, ukrules said:

 

That would depend on whether they extracted, processed it and inserted a certain unexpected 'cleave' into the genome to run experiments in one of their bio hazard labs, essentially turning it from an animal virus which humans generally won't catch into one that's easy for humans to catch...because that's what appears to have happened.

 

 

I was reading an article this morning from the ABC and one of the conclusions was that it was unlikely to have transmitted directly from bats, but from bats to another animal and then to humans. This was the case with MERS and the Hendra virus in Australia. It is an interesting read for the none paranoid people.

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2021-02-10/covid-coronavirus-tracing-animal-origins-bats-sars-hendra/13081684

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...