Jump to content

WHO says all hypotheses still open in probe into virus origins


Recommended Posts

Posted

WHO says all hypotheses still open in probe into virus origins

By Reuters Staff

 

2021-02-12T162740Z_1_LYNXMPEH1B1DQ_RTROPTP_4_HEALTH-CORONAVIRUS-WHO.JPG

FILE PHOTO: Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director General of the World Health Organization (WHO) speaks during the opening of the 148th session of the Executive Board on the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak in Geneva, Switzerland, January 18, 2021. Christopher Black/WHO/Handout via REUTERS

 

GENEVA (Reuters) - All hypotheses are still open in the World Health Organization's search for the origins of COVID-19, WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus told a briefing on Friday.

 

A WHO-led mission in China said this week that it was not looking further into the question of whether the virus escaped from a lab, which it considered highly unlikely. The United States has said it will review the mission's findings.

 

"Some questions have been raised as to whether some hypotheses have been discarded. Having spoken with some members of the team, I wish to confirm that all hypotheses remain open and require further analysis and study," Tedros said.

 

"Some of that work may lie outside the remit and scope of this mission. We have always said that this mission would not find all the answers, but it has added important information that takes us closer to understanding the origins of the COVID-19 virus," he said.

 

The mission has said its main hypotheses are that the virus originated in a bat, although there are several possible scenarios for how it passed to humans, possibly first by infecting another species of animal.

 

The former administration of U.S. President Donald Trump, which left office last month, said it believed the virus may have escaped from a lab in the Chinese city of Wuhan. China has strongly denied this, and says the Wuhan Institute of Virology was not studying related viruses.

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2021-02-13
 
Posted

*deleted post edited out*

 

Yes, money from Fauci’s organization went to the Wuhan lab for “Gain of Function” research on bat coronaviruses, because the U.S. government either shut down Gain of Function research in the U.S., or refused it. 
   The Canadian Government under Trudeau also sent Canadian taxpayer money to the Wuhan lab also, along with virus samples from Canada’s Level 4 lab in Winnipeg, Canada. 
   Smoking gun.......

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Posted
5 hours ago, robblok said:

Sure its clear i came from China, but its also clear the Brit strain evolved in the UK. Did you think that the people form the UK did anything to make it happen or wanted it. I doubt it just as I doubt that it was a thing done on purpose by the Chinese. Viruses just emerge at times, you see it in Africa and now that for instance permafrost is retreating we might get new viruses. These things are not on purpose they just happen. Not sure where the blame game gets us besides an opportunity to bash a country we don't like. 

 

 

And it includes Thailand. I recently watched a TV program showing some places in Northern Thailand being monitored in order to detect possible emergence of new viruses.

Posted
11 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Some people have clearly been inhaling way to much of the smoke from that gun. Support by Fauci's organization (whatever that is) if "gain of function"  is a false allegation first propagated allegation is a falsehood first propagated by the garbage news website known as World Net Daily. It picked up the allegation, unsupported by evidence, from extreme right wing commentator Steve Hilton. Subsequently World Net Daily had to back down somewhat from that claim. There is no evidence at all the gain of function research on a predecessor to the Covid 19 virus was supported by funds obtained through Fauci.

Fact-check: Did Dr. Fauci fund research that created COVID-19?

https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2020/04/29/847948272/why-the-u-s-government-stopped-funding-a-research-project-on-bats-and-coronaviru

Interesting article explaining why they funded such research:

 

"From these they have already identified about 400 wholly new coronaviruses. About 50 of those fall into a category that caused the 2002 outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS, and, now, the COVID-19 pandemic."

.....

"Our work has shown that between 1 [million] and 7 million people a year are exposed in rural China and rural Southeast Asia to these viruses,"

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
44 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Some people have clearly been inhaling way to much of the smoke from that gun. Support by Fauci's organization (whatever that is) of "gain of function"  is a false allegationfirst propagated by the garbage news website known as World Net Daily. It picked up the allegation, unsupported by evidence, from extreme right wing commentator Steve Hilton. Subsequently World Net Daily had to back down somewhat from that claim. There is no evidence at all the gain of function research on a predecessor to the Covid 19 virus was supported by funds obtained through Fauci.

Fact-check: Did Dr. Fauci fund research that created COVID-19?

https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2020/04/29/847948272/why-the-u-s-government-stopped-funding-a-research-project-on-bats-and-coronaviru

    “Support by Fauci’s organization (whatever that is)...”

 

“...that is..” The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, (NIAID) of which Fauci has been the Director since 1984. 
  NIAID funds research by scientists in the United States and throughout the world.
     Just to let you know.... 

  So who’s fact checking your fact checkers?

 

“For several years, NIAID has had a robust intramural and extramural relationship with China focused on biomedical research and training. Many of the research grants with China involve HIV/AIDS, other sexually transmitted diseases, SARS, parasitic diseases (e.g., malaria and schistosomiasis), dengue fever, and influenza. In 2006, about 135 visiting scientists from China were working as collaborators and trainees in NIAID intramural laboratories.”

- NIAID.   https://www.niaid.nih.gov/research/niaid-research-china
 

Covid-19 is a SARS disease in the SARS coronavirus family. 
  (SARS CoVID-19).  

We’ve seen SARS Corona viruses before. They’re not new. You might remember SARS CoVID-1.
Corona viruses have been around for ages, but SARS CoVID-19 is new. 
https://www.niaid.nih.gov/news-events/new-coronavirus-emerges-bats-china-devastates-young-swine

 

https://youtu.be/_txYMXL9NJ0

 

Edited by Catoni
Addition
Posted
46 minutes ago, Catoni said:

    “Support by Fauci’s organization (whatever that is)...”

 

“...that is..” The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, (NIAID) of which Fauci has been the Director since 1984. 
  NIAID funds research by scientists in the United States and throughout the world.
     Just to let you know.... 

  So who’s fact checking your fact checkers?

 

“For several years, NIAID has had a robust intramural and extramural relationship with China focused on biomedical research and training. Many of the research grants with China involve HIV/AIDS, other sexually transmitted diseases, SARS, parasitic diseases (e.g., malaria and schistosomiasis), dengue fever, and influenza. In 2006, about 135 visiting scientists from China were working as collaborators and trainees in NIAID intramural laboratories.”

- NIAID.   https://www.niaid.nih.gov/research/niaid-research-china
 

Covid-19 is a SARS disease in the SARS coronavirus family. 
  (SARS CoVID-19).  

We’ve seen SARS Corona viruses before. They’re not new. You might remember SARS CoVID-1.
Corona viruses have been around for ages, but SARS CoVID-19 is new. 
https://www.niaid.nih.gov/news-events/new-coronavirus-emerges-bats-china-devastates-young-swine

 

https://youtu.be/_txYMXL9NJ0

 

But there is no proof that any of this funding went to create the covid-19 virus.

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, placeholder said:

Some people have clearly been inhaling way to much of the smoke from that gun. Support by Fauci's organization (whatever that is) of "gain of function"  is a false allegationfirst propagated by the garbage news website known as World Net Daily. It picked up the allegation, unsupported by evidence, from extreme right wing commentator Steve Hilton. Subsequently World Net Daily had to back down somewhat from that claim. There is no evidence at all the gain of function research on a predecessor to the Covid 19 virus was supported by funds obtained through Fauci.

Fact-check: Did Dr. Fauci fund research that created COVID-19?

https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2020/04/29/847948272/why-the-u-s-government-stopped-funding-a-research-project-on-bats-and-coronaviru

You are spreading disinformation. The NIH grant was to EcoHealth Alliance in NY, run by Daszak. He then transferred part to the Wuhan lab for the Gain of Function research around 5 years ago, though your link just mentions more recent activity - that they collected 400 distinct previously unknown coronaviruses.

 

While it's claimed that this virus collection program would help prevent the next pandemic, funds might be better spent on sentinel labs to discover outbreaks sooner, with international staff to avoid coverups!

  • Like 2
Posted
12 hours ago, scubascuba3 said:

Either way the world can't afford another pandemic, so something needs to be done I.e close the wet markets at the very least if that's the likely source

Close them even if they are not the origins . Cruelty has no meaning in those places.

  • Like 2
Posted
35 minutes ago, placnx said:

You are spreading disinformation. The NIH grant was to EcoHealth Alliance in NY, run by Daszak. He then transferred part to the Wuhan lab for the Gain of Function research around 5 years ago, though your link just mentions more recent activity - that they collected 400 distinct previously unknown coronaviruses.

 

While it's claimed that this virus collection program would help prevent the next pandemic, funds might be better spent on sentinel labs to discover outbreaks sooner, with international staff to avoid coverups!

And I'm supposed to take your word for that? I googled it and came up with nothing.

What's more, even if the funds were dedicated to gain of function research, would that be a bad thing?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK285579/

 

Posted
11 hours ago, bluesofa said:

That doesn't surprise me, after all wasn't Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus nominated by various African states, but more influentially also by China.

The phrase 'don't bite the hand that feeds you' springs to my mind.

Exactly - i don't entirely trust the impartiality of the WHO, especially under his leadership....too many conflicting agendas.

 

https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2020-03-12/dr-tedros-the-who-chief-leading-the-fight-against-the-pandemic

 

although the fact that Trump criticised him does work in his favour ????

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-51720184

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...