Jump to content

Public health minister says Thailand will continue with the use of AstraZeneca vaccine


Recommended Posts

Posted

AZ.jpg

 

Thailand will go ahead with its COVID-19 vaccination program using the AstraZeneca vaccine, because authorities have not found any rare, but significant and serious side effects among the vaccine’s recipients in Thailand, Public Health Minister Anutin Charnvirakul said today (Thursday).

 

Mr. Anutin chaired a meeting today of the National Communicable Disease Committee, during which he informed those present of the problem with the AstraZeneca vaccine in Denmark.

 

On Tuesday, Denmark announced it will stop using the AstraZeneca vaccine altogether, becoming the first European country to do so, over suspicions of rare but serious side effects.

 

Full story: https://www.thaipbsworld.com/public-health-minister-says-thailand-will-continue-with-the-use-of-astrazeneca-vaccine/

 

Logo-top-.png
  • Haha 1
Posted

They have to because there's no alternative...all supplies of the "deluxe" Moderna and Pfizer-BionTech vaccines are sold out for the foreseeable future. It's A-Z, Chinese, and Russian (and maybe J&J) vaccines for Thailand.

  • Like 2
Posted

Probably he hasn't heard of the new Brazillian mutated Covid.... More infectious specially for the younger people and resistant for the vaccins...

If Sinovac is only effective now for 50% there will be for sure a 4th/5th and 6th wave 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Pattaya Spotter said:

They have to because there's no alternative...all supplies of the "deluxe" Moderna and Pfizer-BionTech vaccines are sold out for the foreseeable future. It's A-Z, Chinese, and Russian (and maybe J&J) vaccines for Thailand.

 

If Thailand was given that choice, and quickly, I believe we would all be pretty happy. European, Chinese, Russian and potentially a US developed quartet.

Posted
30 minutes ago, Rhacsyn said:

 

If Thailand was given that choice, and quickly, I believe we would all be pretty happy. European, Chinese, Russian and potentially a US developed quartet.

The Russian vaccine has been found to be very effective...production capacity is the issue there; the Chinese vaccines (by their own recent admissions) not so much.

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, brommers said:

Anutin would never admit to any failures because he believes he can walk on water.

 

Especially after he had his shot of AZ.

 

I feel for Thai's, only 500,000 so far vaccinated, 66 million to go, perhaps they should give people Influenza shots and Pneumonia shots for the elderly in the interim, somethings got to be better than nothing, that and they are not "experimental vaccines" that cause blood clots.

 

Yes, yes, I know its a different virus, but if they do nothing, we know the outcome, at least they could give it a go, like I said, something is better than nothing, in the interim.

 

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/can-getting-a-flu-shot-help-protect-against-covid-19?fbclid=IwAR3zlk7BZ2sxKTy5GJfRiJd6c6rdusnmONoJNWn3Lj6YJiwnGZ5tLXY7RV8

Edited by 4MyEgo
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Pattaya Spotter said:

They have to because there's no alternative...all supplies of the "deluxe" Moderna and Pfizer-BionTech vaccines are sold out for the foreseeable future. It's A-Z, Chinese, and Russian (and maybe J&J) vaccines for Thailand.

 

Perhaps if they tried thinking outside the square for the short term ?

 

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/can-getting-a-flu-shot-help-protect-against-covid-19?fbclid=IwAR3zlk7BZ2sxKTy5GJfRiJd6c6rdusnmONoJNWn3Lj6YJiwnGZ5tLXY7RV8

Edited by 4MyEgo
Posted
51 minutes ago, 4MyEgo said:

Especially after he had his shot of AZ.

He had the Sinovac Vaccine as he was the first in the country to do so after Prayut backed out and waited on the AZ vaccine.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Pattaya Spotter said:

They have to because there's no alternative...all supplies of the "deluxe" Moderna and Pfizer-BionTech vaccines are sold out for the foreseeable future. It's A-Z, Chinese, and Russian (and maybe J&J) vaccines for Thailand.

And AstraZeneca, Sputnik 5 and J&J's Jansen-vaccine are all based on the same method, also J&J have shown cases of blood clots.

 

Moderna seems so far to be the only vaccine without any known serious side effects, whilst Phizer's has very few.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, wasabi said:

Thailand's best bet is to stick with the AZ vaccine although imperfect. Yes there is a blood clotting risk, but it is quite low. I would like more info on any specific factors other than being a woman under 50 is causing these clots? The AZ vaccine is an effective vaccine. It's possible there won't be any cases of blood clots here or very few. No one likes to play Russian roulette but with a pandemic tough choices are needed. Other options like mRna vaccines may be a year away for Thailand. The economic and health damage of letting the virus continue with nothing but masks and social distancing to stop it will make this a 4th world country by then. As far as the Sinovac vaccine that should be dumped in the trash, but we know Thailand will never admit this mistake. So at least there is the AZ vaccine which offers a way out.

The risk might need to be seen relative to the Covid-19 risk. In EU/EEC AZ showed 30 blood clot-death out of 5.5 million vaccinations, which equals 5.45 death per million. That is a relative small figure compared to for example more than 400 registered Covid-19 deaths, i.e. dead with Covid-19, in Denmark, whilst the official count for Thailand stands at 1.5 per million. So in reality, AstraZeneca is between tre or four times more fatal than the disease it's going to protect against when looking isolated at Thailand. However, the risk seems to be mainly women under the age of 50, wherefore numerous European countries still recommend the use of AZ for the elder population from 65 years of age and up, and Denmark considers if it can be voluntary for those that already got their first vaccination to opt for one more with AZ.

But I agree, Thailand at the moment don't have much other choices than Chinese Sinovac and AZ.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, ThailandRyan said:

He had the Sinovac Vaccine as he was the first in the country to do so after Prayut backed out and waited on the AZ vaccine.

 

My bad, I got it back the front.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, wasabi said:

Thailand's best bet is to stick with the AZ vaccine although imperfect. Yes there is a blood clotting risk, but it is quite low. I would like more info on any specific factors other than being a woman under 50 is causing these clots? The AZ vaccine is an effective vaccine. It's possible there won't be any cases of blood clots here or very few. No one likes to play Russian roulette but with a pandemic tough choices are needed. Other options like mRna vaccines may be a year away for Thailand. The economic and health damage of letting the virus continue with nothing but masks and social distancing to stop it will make this a 4th world country by then. As far as the Sinovac vaccine that should be dumped in the trash, but we know Thailand will never admit this mistake. So at least there is the AZ vaccine which offers a way out.

And why the Sinovac vaccine should be dumped in the trash? Because it is from China?

 

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-13/are-china-s-covid-shots-less-effective-experts-size-up-sinovac

 

"That’s what you expect from Covid vaccines -- higher efficacy against more severe infections and lower against milder ones. From what I can see, it looks like a very worthwhile vaccine. The problem with the data is it didn’t include many old people or many people with co-morbidities."

 

Quote from one of the experts.

Posted
2 hours ago, gearbox said:

And why the Sinovac vaccine should be dumped in the trash? Because it is from China?

 

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-13/are-china-s-covid-shots-less-effective-experts-size-up-sinovac

 

"That’s what you expect from Covid vaccines -- higher efficacy against more severe infections and lower against milder ones. From what I can see, it looks like a very worthwhile vaccine. The problem with the data is it didn’t include many old people or many people with co-morbidities."

 

Quote from one of the experts.

 

Just for the record nothing to do with being from China. Very low efficacy is why. Thailand should have stayed in Covac but pride kept them out. Now the country suffers while they can all fool themselves that "Thailand Number 1"

  • Like 2
Posted
51 minutes ago, chilly07 said:

Just Get On With It!

We have all got to wait for June, i'll be amazed if the AZ vaccine will be produced here then, and in the numbers stated

  • Like 2
Posted
3 hours ago, khunPer said:

And AstraZeneca, Sputnik 5 and J&J's Jansen-vaccine are all based on the same method, also J&J have shown cases of blood clots.

 

Moderna seems so far to be the only vaccine without any known serious side effects, whilst Phizer's has very few.

The same issue cannot be ruled out. Every indication is that referring to "blood clots" is a distortion. The condition that appears to have been identified is Thrombocytopenia, low platlet count, and blood clotting is a rare side effect of that condition. How many of those that have had any of the vaccines could have had a low platlet count without it being identified.

Dengue fever creates a low platlet count, been there, but how many develop blood clots. As far as I am aware, the majority that die do so from bleeding.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...