Jump to content

Guidelines for travelers entering Thailand after its reopening


webfact

Recommended Posts

630542c96c13fdb9ed694334779d2bbe_small.jpg

Photo : www.thaiembassy.com

 

By Praphorn Praphornkulv

 

BANGKOK (NNT) - Phuket will reopen to vaccinated tourists tomorrow (July 1st), with Prime Minister and Defense Minister, Gen. Prayut Chan-o-cha, set to arrive in the province to oversee its reopening. The Royal Gazette’s website recently published the 26th emergency decree on requirements and guidelines for reopening the tourism sector in pilot areas, starting tomorrow.

 

The decree focuses on additional requirements and disease-control measures for travelers entering Thailand. The decree designates tourism areas in pilot provinces, while setting conditions, time, management and other criteria for travelers entering the kingdom.

 

Concerning disease-control measures, the Center for COVID-19 Situation Administration (CCSA) has issued guidelines for the Phuket Sandbox tourism scheme, and they have been published on the Royal Gazette’s website. The main requirements remain as before - notable, visitors must come from low COVID-19 risk countries or areas. They are required to register with related platforms and submit their documents for verification. The documents are as follows:

 

- Certificate of Entry

 

- Medical certificate that shows negative COVID-19 infection, using the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test within 72 hours before departure

 

- Health insurance, covering COVID-19, with minimum coverage of 100,000 US dollars

 

- Proof of payment of Safety and Health Administration (SHA) Plus accommodation for at least 14 days. Visitors staying fewer than 14 days must have a ticket specifying the date of departure

 

- Certificate of Vaccination issued for no less than 14 days. Persons under 18 years old, accompanied by their parents or guardians, must have a medical certificate showing negative COVID-19 infection within 72 hours prior to departure

 

Travelers entering the kingdom are to pass the immigration process, install an application or a tracking system and be tested three times. The first is on the day of arrival, the second on the sixth or seventh day and the third on the 12th or 13th day. Visitors have to pay the cost of COVID-19 testing. If their results are negative after 14 days, they can travel to other areas. If they stay less than 14 days, they are not allowed to travel outside designated areas.

 

All 230 Sandbox Hotels in Phuket - Book Now!

 

nnt.jpg

 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ezzra said:

I know that many, many topics were about this subject already but had the Thai authorities were as half as vigilant, busybody and serious with their own people in preventing the spread of this Covid business as they are with incoming, revenue bringing vaccinated tourists, this country would not be in the mess it is now..,

 

While I agree with you, that's simply not possible when they don't have enough vaccines, a proper RT-PCR test costs several days' salary at minimum wage, and so much of the economy revolves around cheap migrant labor flowing freely across the borders.

 

At the very least, I'd have them test all Thais entering the Phuket sandbox, but even that's pretty punitive when they're going to Phuket to make perhaps 300 baht a day.  One test before arriving, another before release from your hotel room...  There goes almost a month's salary.

 

Edit:  OTOH, it's interesting that India's Supreme Court is being asked to limit RT-PCR test fees to less than $5 USD...  Which they claim, allows the hospital to make some money.

 

Edited by impulse
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, webfact said:

.....entering Thailand after its reopening

 

 

The documents are as follows:

 

- Certificate of Entry

 

- Medical certificate that shows negative COVID-19 infection, using the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test within 72 hours before departure

 

- Health insurance, covering COVID-19, with minimum coverage of 100,000 US dollars

 

- Proof of payment of Safety and Health Administration (SHA) Plus accommodation for at least 14 days. Visitors staying fewer than 14 days must have a ticket specifying the date of departure

 

- Certificate of Vaccination issued for no less than 14 days. Persons under 18 years old, accompanied by their parents or guardians, must have a medical certificate showing negative COVID-19 infection within 72 hours prior to departure

 

Travelers entering the kingdom are to pass the immigration process, install an application or a tracking system and be tested three times. The first is on the day of arrival, the second on the sixth or seventh day and the third on the 12th or 13th day. Visitors have to pay the cost of COVID-19 testing. If their results are negative after 14 days, they can travel to other areas. If they stay less than 14 days, they are not allowed to travel outside designated areas.

...and this is after re-opening.....????

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Boedog said:

So your point is the vaccine does what, helps you survive something that has over a 99% survival rate, pretty clever

 

Not my point buddy, only giving you the background.   Were you to be tested positive, you would be hospitalised and quarantined.   Guess what, that will cost money, and hence the insurance requirement.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Boedog said:

So your point is the vaccine does what, helps you survive something that has over a 99% survival rate, pretty clever

CFR vary considerably with age, co-morbidities, time, geography.

 

If you assumed a CFR of say your 1% that suggests no more than 47,000 deaths in the UK, but the number of deaths (within 28 days of a positive result) in the UK is 128,000.

 

That equates to 2.7%......WITH lockdowns, social distancing, working from home and the introduction of the vaccine.

 

What might the CFR rate have been without all those steps having been taken?

 

 

Screen Shot 2021-07-01 at 07.18.54.jpg

Edited by Surelynot
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pagallim said:

 

Not my point buddy, only giving you the background.   Were you to be tested positive, you would be hospitalised and quarantined.   Guess what, that will cost money, and hence the insurance requirement.

Even if it happened to be a false positive, which, let's face it isn't exactly unknown!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, impulse said:

 

While I agree with you, that's simply not possible when they don't have enough vaccines, a proper RT-PCR test costs several days' salary at minimum wage, and so much of the economy revolves around cheap migrant labor flowing freely across the borders.

 

At the very least, I'd have them test all Thais entering the Phuket sandbox, but even that's pretty punitive when they're going to Phuket to make perhaps 300 baht a day.  One test before arriving, another before release from your hotel room...  There goes almost a month's salary.

 

Edit:  OTOH, it's interesting that India's Supreme Court is being asked to limit RT-PCR test fees to less than $5 USD...  Which they claim, allows the hospital to make some money.

 

What you didn't say, and I imagine you must have considered it, is that "a proper RT-PCR test costs the recipient several days' salary....."

My point is that Thailand would make people pay for these tests whereas other countries give them to people to benefit all.

Went to my local UK pharmacy the other day, and I was given a box of 7 rapid lateral flow tests to keep at home until I needed them.

 

 

IMG_20210701_082413.jpg.4f9ae02a20b9fb254752258571504ba7.jpg

 

It's not as if Thailand is a poor country any more, but I think we can guess where the money is kept.

Sadly, much the same applies to India.  It's almost as if they were having a race to the bottom!

Edited by VBF
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, ezzra said:

At the very beginning of the Covid pandemic Thailand was clean and devoid of any infections, the people in charge were resting on their laurels laughing all the way to bank loaded with tourist dollars thinking that Thailand is somehow immune from this disaster and DID NOTHING to prevent, prepare or preempt the pandemic from happening, and now the whole country is suffering this devil may care blaze attitude of this government...

 

Yup, they thought they were special and frittered away a year's head start.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Surelynot said:

CFR vary considerably with age, co-morbidities, time, geography.

 

If you assumed a CFR of say your 1% that suggests no more than 47,000 deaths in the UK, but the number of deaths (within 28 days of a positive result) in the UK is 128,000.

 

That equates to 2.7%......WITH lockdowns, social distancing, working from home and the introduction of the vaccine.

 

What might the CFR rate have been without all those steps having been taken?

 

 

Pointless conversation with the brainwashed, you believe what you want time will tell when the human trails have finished 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, VBF said:

Even if it happened to be a false positive, which, let's face it isn't exactly unknown!

False positive rates vary with PCR tests due to the CT sensitivity setting on the lab machines. We don't know that setting for the ones in Thailand. But, reports generally seem to put the false pos rate for those at an average of 0.5%. So, if each traveler must get three, their chance of getting a false positive would be 1.5%. That would mean that for every 1,000 sandbox players, 15 will get a false positive and all the consequences of that.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Boedog said:
8 hours ago, Surelynot said:

CFR vary considerably with age, co-morbidities, time, geography.

 

If you assumed a CFR of say your 1% that suggests no more than 47,000 deaths in the UK, but the number of deaths (within 28 days of a positive result) in the UK is 128,000.

 

That equates to 2.7%......WITH lockdowns, social distancing, working from home and the introduction of the vaccine.

 

What might the CFR rate have been without all those steps having been taken?

 

 

Pointless conversation with the brainwashed, you believe what you want time will tell when the human trails have finished 

Expand  

Always good to get a detail, well structured response......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/1/2021 at 2:27 PM, Surelynot said:

CFR vary considerably with age, co-morbidities, time, geography.

 

If you assumed a CFR of say your 1% that suggests no more than 47,000 deaths in the UK, but the number of deaths (within 28 days of a positive result) in the UK is 128,000.

 

That equates to 2.7%......WITH lockdowns, social distancing, working from home and the introduction of the vaccine.

 

What might the CFR rate have been without all those steps having been taken?

 

 

Screen Shot 2021-07-01 at 07.18.54.jpg

Said the sheep, the point of science is the ability to question it, some people believe what there told by Government and media your obviously one of those people so it's pointless talking to anyone that excepts everything there told as truth good for you, there's also no deaths from the flu since Covid arrived 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.






×
×
  • Create New...