Jump to content

Red Bull Boss inquiry: Former deputy attorney general says he acted within the law


webfact

Recommended Posts

3pm.jpg

Picture: Daily News

 

Daily News reported on the latest tidbit from the committee of inquiry into the case of Red Bull scion Vorayuth Yoovidhya or Boss.

 

Chairman of the committee Kaisit Pisuangprakan said that he had questioned former deputy attorney general Net Naksuk as to why charges were dropped.

 

He said that Net claimed that everything was done according to the law and proper procedures. 

 

Kaisit said that the committee will report its findings as soon as possible but would not confirm when that would be.

 

Around fifteen people including senior police are expected to be questioned.

 

ASEAN NOW notes that the case has dragged on for years since Boss drove his Ferrari into Pol Sen Sgt Maj Wichian Klanprasert in the Thong Lo area of Bangkok in September 2012. 

 

The policeman was dragged several hundred meters to his death.

 

A huge public outcry came last year when it was announced that charges against the billionaire heir were to be dropped prompting Thai PM Prayuth Chan-ocha to reinstate them.

 

Boss fled Thailand in 2017 and despite some sightings over the years his whereabouts remain unknown. 

 

An ASEAN NOW request to Interpol for details of the Red Notice about the fugitive was denied with the Lyon headquarters suggesting that all media inquiries be directed to the Thai police. 

 

The RTP have claimed that a red or arrest notice remains in place for the suspect. 

 

A red notice does not require that member nations of Interpol take any specific action, just that they are aware that the subject is wanted in connection with a certain crime. 

 

In Boss's case this is a charge of vehicular killing and taking cocaine. 

 

asean_now_BB.jpg
  • Like 1
  • Sad 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ThailandRyan said:
9 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Sounds like you got it wrong again.   The officer's family received B3m agreed compensation (he was single with no dependents) with no clause that any case against him should not be filed.

 

As Vorayuth has no direct connection with the company, he's just a nephew of one of the directors, your insisting on 10% of the Red Bull company and profits for life is laughable.    Vorayuth is not a director or an employee of Red Bull.

Expand  

Have you ever thought my post was sarcastic in nature, no thought not. ????

Congratulations on the supremely subtle sarcasm of your 10% compensation suggestion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

So, what if his whereabouts are known?

Then perhaps, just perhaps, any police/judicial system with the slightest trace of respect for the law and justice would arrest him (or request his arrest and extradition if he is abroad) and put him on trial for " vehicular murder".

 

Enough of us complain that the Thais are "scofflaws", well it is hardly surprising is it?

 

Edited by herfiehandbag
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, herfiehandbag said:
20 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

So, what if his whereabouts are known?

Then perhaps, just perhaps, any police/judicial system with the slightest trace of respect for the law and justice would arrest him (or request his arrest and extradition if he is abroad) and put him on trial for " vehicular murder".

He's not wanted for any offence, anywhere, except Thailand so, short of a successful extradition request, there's no reason for any police force, anywhere to want to arrest him.  "Respect for law and justice" does not come into it.   

 

By the way, he's not wanted for murder, "vehicular" or otherwise.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, herfiehandbag said:
15 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

He's not wanted for any offence, anywhere, except Thailand so, short of a successful extradition request, there's no reason for any police force, anywhere to want to arrest him.  "Respect for law and justice" does not come into it.   

 

By the way, he's not wanted for murder, "vehicular" or otherwise.

Expand  

OK "vehicular killing".

No, not that either.   "Reckless driving causing death" is the charge.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

No, not that either.   "Reckless driving causing death" is the charge.

Fair enough - I was quoting the OP.

 

It doesn't really change the thrust of the argument though does it? He could and should be arrested and sent for trial.

 

 

Edited by herfiehandbag
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, webfact said:

A red notice does not require that member nations of Interpol take any specific action, just that they are aware that the subject is wanted in connection with a certain crime. 

However, after they receive an extradition request, they do. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Sounds like you got it wrong again.   The officer's family received B3m agreed compensation (he was single with no dependents) with no clause that any case against him should not be filed.

 

As Vorayuth has no direct connection with the company, he's just a nephew of one of the directors, your insisting on 10% of the Red Bull company and profits for life is laughable.    Vorayuth is not a director or an employee of Red Bull.

His father is the largest single shareholder and scion of the Red Bull family as the oldest son. And he was an employee when the incident happened. I thought the officer was married?

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Sounds like you got it wrong again.   The officer's family received B3m agreed compensation (he was single with no dependents) with no clause that any case against him should not be filed.

 

As Vorayuth has no direct connection with the company, he's just a nephew of one of the directors, your insisting on 10% of the Red Bull company and profits for life is laughable.    Vorayuth is not a director or an employee of Red Bull.

What does he do to support himself? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, candide said:
8 hours ago, webfact said:

A red notice does not require that member nations of Interpol take any specific action, just that they are aware that the subject is wanted in connection with a certain crime. 

However, after they receive an extradition request, they do. 

Only if the extradition request is agreed to!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...