Nonsense.
You suggest that if a 'special needs' independent school was forced to close, the state would not be able to step into the breech. Why not? The infrastructure would be there. The staff could be offered teaching contracts within the state system. It could be a simple transfer of administration. Whether bureaucracy would prevent this happening is another matter.
Your newly introduced quote from The Telegraph is a prime example of a misleading headline and inference. It is true that 'Special needs' schools
face 20% VAT on their fees, and State schools may well be currently failing pupils with 'special needs' - hardly something that can be lain at the feet of the Labour government - but the latter is not a consequence of the former as the Telegraph would like people to believe.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now