Corrupt government officials are seen as the leading reason foreigners can illegally run businesses in Thailand, according to a nationwide NIDA Poll. Some 67.10% of respondents blamed corruption or misconduct among state officials for businesses directly operated by foreigners or run through Thai nominees. The findings were released on Sunday 19 July 2026, after telephone interviews conducted from July 13-15 among Thai residents aged 18 and over. The issue has particular relevance for foreigners living, investing or working in Thailand. The poll reflects strong public concern about nominee businesses, restricted occupations and alleged grey-money operations. The survey came as Thailand was again dealing with allegations that corrupt officials, hospital staff and Thai men falsely claiming paternity had helped Chinese babies obtain Thai citizenship. Law enforcement agencies have also recently broken up several foreign-owned businesses, from small firms to larger operations, allegedly fronted by Thai nominees in major cities and tourist destinations. Corruption and weak enforcement blamed After corrupt officials, 59.31% of respondents cited inadequate penalties as enabling offences by foreign nationals. Government policies or legal loopholes were named by 52.21%, followed by corruption or misconduct among politicians at 50.46%. A further 48.70% blamed Thais seeking personal financial gain, including those assisting or acting for foreigners. Lack of official oversight was selected by 44.35%, while 29.54% pointed to public indifference. Each respondent could select more than one answer; 0.31% gave no answer. NIDA said its sample was selected across regions and education, occupation and income groups. It used probability sampling from its master database and multistage sampling, with a stated sampling error not exceeding 0.05 at a 97% confidence level. Strong concern over grey money and nominees Foreign investment in illegal businesses or operations used to launder grey money was considered very dangerous by 94.05% of those surveyed. Another 5.42% called it somewhat dangerous, while 0.30% said it was not very dangerous, 0.08% not dangerous at all and 0.15% did not answer. Thai nominees holding land for foreigners were rated very dangerous by 82.14%, while 81.76% said false registration of Thai men as fathers of foreign children seeking Thai nationality was very dangerous. So-called zero-dollar businesses were considered very dangerous by 81.29%. NIDA described these as networks controlled entirely by foreign investors within their own national group, limiting income for Thai businesses and workers. Thai nominee arrangements used to establish companies or hold majority business stakes were rated very dangerous by 81.21%. Large concentrations of foreign residents developing into separate communities or enclaves concerned 77.48%. Foreigners working outside their permit conditions were seen as very dangerous by 72.98%. Jobs reserved for Thais, including commercial driving, tour guiding and organising tours, were rated very dangerous by 65.42%. Asked what they had personally encountered, 35.95% said they had never seen unlawful conduct by foreign nationals. However, 26.11% cited foreign investment in illegal or alleged grey-money businesses, 25.88% nominee companies, 20.92% land nominees and 18.85% foreign enclaves. NIDA stressed that these were perceptions and reported experiences, not independently verified criminal cases. Join the discussion? 20 July 2026
View full article