Jump to content

Florida teachers forced to remove books from their classrooms—or face felony charges


Scott

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

So there you go, start with banning books and move on to banning teachers.

 

I really do suggest you read the history of the first half of tge 20th Century.

Will there be right wing nutters descending on libraries and ransacking in search of undesirable books like a sort of cultural revolution. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

If their ideology is "keep kids safe", why is that so bad?

 

Multiple people have explained multiple times what this is about. Why keep pretending like they're banning every book except for a very narrow few that conform to their ideology? It's obviously about protecting children from a certain type of harmful ideology.

Because, as has been explained repeatedly, they are banning every book from school libraries (not just the classroom) that is not on their approved list.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, pomchop said:

If you want to ban a book that is full of sex, murder, violence and fairy tales start with the Bible.

It should be banned from schools anyway based on the principles of the separation of church and state and of inclusion.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

Underscoring how critical an issue it is for Republicans, former President Trump unveiled his education platform on Thursday, calling for cutting federal funds to any education program that involves “critical race theory, gender ideology, or other inappropriate racial, sexual, or political content onto our children.”

I mean, who can argue against such a reasonable and sound view?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 2009 said:

I mean, who can argue against such a reasonable and sound view?

Suppression of critical race theory is anything but inappropriate. The point was made by another poster was that politicians should not be the ones setting the rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

Suppression of critical race theory is anything but inappropriate. The point was made by another poster was that politicians should not be the ones setting the rules.

Critical race theory doesn't really sound like a topic suitable for children though, right?

 

University, okay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, wwest5829 said:

Broaden the reading, “After nearly three weeks of being pressed to explain their decisions, Florida’s education officials shared 5,895 pages of documents showing what the state’s textbook reviewers saw in the volumes that led to their rejection.” - Washington Post. There is a lot to be digested, reflection on “unintended” or intended consequences being discussed. My reflection on what I taught certainly is questioned by some reviews of the books, if they allude to systemic rascism in the US, inequality in gender or racial treatment, stating that there is such a thing as climate change … My main concern is limiting what can be taught, by whom, and denying documented facts in favor of a political agenda. My political agenda as an educator is “academic freedom” to investigate, discuss, explore, discuss any topic. It appears to me in history that those who seek to restrict/control education are doing so to keep control politically over their citizenry. Politico has an additional article.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, 2009 said:

Critical race theory doesn't really sound like a topic suitable for children though, right?

 

University, okay.

Why? Australian students want to learn more aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander. In Singapore, history of her origin is taught at primary schools. You have been hookwinked by the far right conservatives using culture war as a political leverage because they have nothing in terms of policies to offer to the general public. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ozimoron said:

former President Trump unveiled his education platform on Thursday, calling for cutting federal funds to any education program that involves “critical race theory, gender ideology, or other inappropriate racial, sexual, or political content onto our children.”

I think he's 100% right and would add 'promotion of any religion', and 'climate change alarmism' to his list.

Edited by BritManToo
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BritManToo said:

I think he's 100% right and add 'promotion of any religion', and 'climate change alarmism' to his list.

Trump promotes religion. Your second sentence illustrates why politicians shouldn't decide what gets taught and what doesn't.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Slip said:

Either you have not read 1984 or you did not understand it.  As a child was your access to books restricted by a right wing politician with an agenda perhaps?

I had a library card for my town library, and could read any book I liked.

The school library was much more restrictive.

 

My class mates could just about manage Enid Blyton, I was reading HG Wells and Edgar Rice Burroughs.

Edited by BritManToo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

I had a library card for my town library, and could read any book I liked.

The school library was much more restrictive.

 

My class mates could just about manage Enid Blyton, I was reading HG Wells and Edgar Rice Burroughs.

You should have focused on the books that taught critical thinking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

I think he's 100% right and would add 'promotion of any religion', and 'climate change alarmism' to his list.

Of course that should be added when you don't have any real policies for the people. You can easily fool the gullible. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ozimoron said:

It is keeping kids safe. Banning every book except for "ideologically correct" books is dangerous for kids.

That isn't what is happening.  It's simply a tool for keeping the dangerous books out.

 

2 hours ago, ozimoron said:

I've made my point and now I have work to do. Enjoy your day ????

Enjoy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ozimoron said:

It's not about classroom libraries, that a right wing talking point. It's all school libraries.

It's about classroom libraries in the original post, the twitter post and the article linked.

 

If you read the article, all they're doing is having a specially trained member of staff who already works at the school approve the books that can be used in the school.  It isn't the government doing it.  They haven't got the the teacher's personal books yet, so the school has asked teachers to remove any unauthorised books.

 

it's all hot air and performance by the teachers.  Probably because ego makes them think that no one should be able to tell them what books are and aren't allowed in "their" classroom.


From the article:

Quote

 

The policy comes in response to HB 1467, which requires all reading material in schools to be selected by an employee with a valid education media specialist certificate.

 

Each of Manatee County's more than 60 schools has at least one certified media center specialist to vet books, Chapman said. The district and schools have begun making calls for volunteers to help teachers go through their classroom libraries and inventory what was already approved and what needs to be approved. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...