Jump to content

Florida woman argues her unborn baby should be released from jail


Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, Berkshire said:

Yeah, but if the state of Florida sees the fetus as a person, then that person is being unlawfully detained.  The kid didn't murder anybody! 

The foetus  is being unlawfully detained in its mothers stomach ?

  • Love It 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Tug said:

Naaa the fetus is just as guilty as the person who pulled the trigger it was at the scene of the crime guilty by association throw the book at it lol 

No it is not, it is under the age of legal responsibility.

  • Love It 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Berkshire said:

Yeah, but if the state of Florida sees the fetus as a person, then that person is being unlawfully detained.  The kid didn't murder anybody! 

Obviously the fetus is an accessory.

Posted

Prosecution Lawyer to fetus: "And were you at the scene of the crime?"

Fetus: "Yes, but I was an unwilling accomplice."

Lawyer: "But you don't deny being there?"

Fetus: "No, but I didn't see anything."

Lawyer: "How could you not see anything? You were right on the spot."

Defense lawyer: "Objection Your Honor, he or she doesn't have eyes yet."

Judge: "Sustained."

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
8 hours ago, userabcd said:

No it is not, it is under the age of legal responsibility.

I say try it as an adult lol seriously a novel move on the part of the perpetrator that beeing said hopefully for the baby’s sake she gets the proper pre natal care in prison 

  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, puchooay said:

Is there a law in Florida against taking a minor with you while you commit murder?

 

If so, that needs to be added to the charge sheet.

It was a foetus , it wasn't a minor

Posted
21 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

It was a foetus , it wasn't a minor

Not according to the accused.

 

My point was, if it is being held against it's will. It has to be considered when prosecuting the accused. Can't gave it both ways.

Posted
5 minutes ago, puchooay said:

Not according to the accused.

 

My point was, if it is being held against it's will. It has to be considered when prosecuting the accused. Can't gave it both ways.

The accused is trying to get herself out of jail by being "clever" and her opinion isn't the law

 

Posted
41 minutes ago, bangon04 said:

but but the bible thumpers in Florida insist that the life begins at the moment of conception......

Yes, that would be when life begins as a foetus , when the foetus is born, it becomes a baby 

Posted
45 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

The accused is trying to get herself out of jail by being "clever" and her opinion isn't the law

 

Exactly my point. The prosecution need to point out it goes both ways.

Posted
15 hours ago, placnx said:

Obviously the fetus is an accessory.

The way some celebrities like to show off their gravid bodies you would think it qualifies as a fashion accessory.

 

*Graphic edited out*

 

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

Yes, that would be when life begins as a foetus , when the foetus is born, it becomes a baby 

There are billboards of this sort all over the USA.  A smart person would be aware of the propaganda before taking a side.

 

*Graphic edited out*

 

 

 

 

Posted
6 hours ago, puchooay said:

Exactly my point. The prosecution need to point out it goes both ways.

From the OP I think her point is that she doesn't get proper pre natal care. I wonder if there are any other prisoners in the same situation, and the case could easily be resolved by providing "proper" pre natal care.

If it can be proven that the pre natal care is insufficient then she has a case, IMO.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

From the OP I think her point is that she doesn't get proper pre natal care. I wonder if there are any other prisoners in the same situation, and the case could easily be resolved by providing "proper" pre natal care.

If it can be proven that the pre natal care is insufficient then she has a case, IMO.

No. She's trying to get released on the grounds her "baby" is being held for no reason. From the OP, that'd made quite obvious.

  • Like 1
Posted
8 hours ago, puchooay said:

Not according to the accused.

 

My point was, if it is being held against it's will. It has to be considered when prosecuting the accused. Can't gave it both ways.

Double switch.

 

It’s the Florida law that claims a fetus is a baby, the litigant is using ‘the legal’ definition, not ‘having it both ways’.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
1 hour ago, puchooay said:

No. She's trying to get released on the grounds her "baby" is being held for no reason. From the OP, that'd made quite obvious.

Did you miss "In an emergency petition in a Florida court, Ms Harrell's lawyer argued that jail staff have endangered the child through "a lack of reasonable and necessary prenatal care". ?

 

Where is that saying about being held for "no reason"?

Posted
20 hours ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

The foetus  is being unlawfully detained in its mothers stomach ?

This is a very good point, at what age does the baby [which is parsley developed] have rights?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...