Popular Post webfact Posted March 10, 2023 Popular Post Posted March 10, 2023 Picture: Thai Rath In a sign that even the rich and famous are not immune from corruption charges, Thailand's office of the National Anti-Corruption Commission are going after well known forensic scientist Pornthip Rojanasunan over the bomb and drugs scanners fiasco. Pornthip is one of the most recognisable figures in Thailand with her trademark punk hair. This belies the fact that she is a "khunying" - a title that places her high up in the Thai social hierarchy. She is the former director of the prestigious national forensics' institute. The public love her and should she fall from grace it would be a major deal in Thailand. The GT 200 and Alpha 6 bombs and drugs scanners were completely useless items of equipment procured from abroad at huge costm reported Thai Rath. There have always been claims that their purchase was mired in corruption yet the prosecutors office said there was not enough evidence. The NACC begs to differ. They say there is ample evidence to proceed against Pornthip and others in the case for both disciplinary and criminal matters. Their case concerns four contracts for the equipment that proved to be like children's toys rather than serious scanners for bombs and drugs. -- © Copyright ASEAN NOW 2023-03-10 - Cigna offers a range of visa-compliant plans that meet the minimum requirement of medical treatment, including COVID-19, up to THB 3m. For more information on all expat health insurance plans click here. The most versatile and flexible rental investment and holiday home solution in Thailand - click for more information. Get your business in front of millions of customers who read ASEAN NOW with an interest in Thailand every month - email [email protected] for more information 2 1 2
Popular Post worgeordie Posted March 10, 2023 Popular Post Posted March 10, 2023 25 minutes ago, webfact said: There have always been claims that their purchase was mired in corruption yet the prosecutors office said there was not enough evidence. Not enough evidence ,they must be joking ,why going after her , much bigger fish involved regards worgeordie 14 5 2
Popular Post bamnutsak Posted March 10, 2023 Popular Post Posted March 10, 2023 Who'd she pi$$ off? 5 5 1
Popular Post kotsak Posted March 10, 2023 Popular Post Posted March 10, 2023 19 minutes ago, bamnutsak said: Who'd she pi$$ off? Someone higher up the food chain? 4 3 1
Popular Post Emdog Posted March 10, 2023 Popular Post Posted March 10, 2023 I like her. She's <deleted> off many.... recall the tsunami and how she insisted on taking DNA samples etc of victims and that led to feeling of stepped on toes for those gov types who just wanted to burn them. I also believe she had input on that put up job of those two Burmese workers monkey trialed into conviction for killing the couple on Koh Tao that angered the local pirates and their official henchmen But I could be wrong... 5 2
Popular Post Artisi Posted March 10, 2023 Popular Post Posted March 10, 2023 Pay-back for pi$$ing off a few well to do base-holes in her career. 3 2
Popular Post Snig27 Posted March 10, 2023 Popular Post Posted March 10, 2023 3 hours ago, bamnutsak said: Who'd she pi$$ off? She said the other day that Prayut was not fit to be PM, something most of the nation knows. 6 1 4
Popular Post Patong2021 Posted March 10, 2023 Popular Post Posted March 10, 2023 She should have been dealt with long ago. Her forensics reputation was in tatters a decade ago when she was the center of media attention. Describing the bomb detectors as a "mistake" isn't sufficient. She has responsibility in the debacle. 4 1
Popular Post Bundooman Posted March 10, 2023 Popular Post Posted March 10, 2023 20 minutes ago, hellohello123 said: She clearly didnt use it on her hair Surprisingly, her hair looks very nice - despite the contrasting colours. It's a very western style and it suits her and for her age, she's also quite attractive. It's her past that's being criticised, not her hair style. By the way, hellohello123 - do you actually have any hair yourself? Show us a photo for a laugh! 1 9
kotsak Posted March 10, 2023 Posted March 10, 2023 17 minutes ago, Patong2021 said: She should have been dealt with long ago. Her forensics reputation was in tatters a decade ago when she was the center of media attention. Describing the bomb detectors as a "mistake" isn't sufficient. She has responsibility in the debacle. I still remember her rationale on giving the green light for the purchase of the GT detectors. Very scientific ???? From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GT200 She said: "I do not feel embarrassed if the bomb detector is proven ineffective. Personally, I have never handled the device myself. But my people have used it and it is accurate every time. Long long time ago, people believed that the Earth is flat and anyone who said otherwise faced execution. Things which are not visible does not necessarily mean they do not exist. The devices are there and no one has the right to ban their use. I will continue to use it." 1 1 1
Popular Post Purdey Posted March 10, 2023 Popular Post Posted March 10, 2023 Quite surprised she is the only one thus far involved and not some army generals. I thought this was considered military equipment? I presume there were soldiers who tested the equipment and reported to higher ups that it worked. How a forensic scientist was able to give approval for military equipment is hard to understand. 2 3 2
Popular Post Artisi Posted March 10, 2023 Popular Post Posted March 10, 2023 10 minutes ago, kotsak said: I still remember her rationale on giving the green light for the purchase of the GT detectors. Very scientific ???? From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GT200 She said: "I do not feel embarrassed if the bomb detector is proven ineffective. Personally, I have never handled the device myself. But my people have used it and it is accurate every time. Long long time ago, people believed that the Earth is flat and anyone who said otherwise faced execution. Things which are not visible does not necessarily mean they do not exist. The devices are there and no one has the right to ban their use. I will continue to use it." Correct, but why was she even involved, well out of her field of expertise? I could never understand why she commented. 2 1
Popular Post Snig27 Posted March 10, 2023 Popular Post Posted March 10, 2023 11 minutes ago, Purdey said: and not some army generals Generals prosecuted for corrupt practices? It would never happen on Prayut's *watch*. 1 6
transam Posted March 10, 2023 Posted March 10, 2023 5 hours ago, worgeordie said: Not enough evidence ,they must be joking ,why going after her , much bigger fish involved regards worgeordie The hair doooo. ????
kingstonkid Posted March 10, 2023 Posted March 10, 2023 6 hours ago, worgeordie said: Not enough evidence ,they must be joking ,why going after her , much bigger fish involved regards worgeordie Isn't this the corruption scandal that got big joke in trouble. Now we know why they pulled him she was protected by a soon to be ex pm and an organization we can not mention. 1
Popular Post realfunster Posted March 10, 2023 Popular Post Posted March 10, 2023 2 hours ago, kotsak said: She said: "I do not feel embarrassed if the bomb detector is proven ineffective. Personally, I have never handled the device myself. But my people have used it and it is accurate every time. Long long time ago, people believed that the Earth is flat and anyone who said otherwise faced execution. Things which are not visible does not necessarily mean they do not exist. The devices are there and no one has the right to ban their use. I will continue to use it." I ran that through Google translate, the damn thing must have some code that needs fixing as it said : “I am getting a very nice backhander to play along with this nationally embarrassing episode, so please stop bugging me and go away”. 1 1 4
RichardColeman Posted March 10, 2023 Posted March 10, 2023 9 hours ago, webfact said: ornthip is one of the most recognisable figures in Thailand with her trademark punk hair. a title that places her high up in the Thai social hierarchy. Hairarchy might be more suitable then
AlQaholic Posted March 10, 2023 Posted March 10, 2023 Now why would a national forensic scientist even come close to involvement in the military purchasing empty boxes with bogus metal probes sticking out of them?
Popular Post Artisi Posted March 10, 2023 Popular Post Posted March 10, 2023 2 hours ago, realfunster said: I ran that through Google translate, the damn thing must have some code that needs fixing as it said : “I am getting a very nice backhander to play along with this nationally embarrassing episode, so please stop bugging me and go away”. Not sure I agree but top marks for the parody - clever. 1 2
Tango777 Posted March 10, 2023 Posted March 10, 2023 Not sure if these are the same units, but in Iraq they (the Iraqi recipients of US $) had these contraptions which were basically shoe boxes with coat hangers sticking out. And we had to wait at the check points. Check point are among the most dangerous places to be. They were bought at something like a couple hundred K each. A big scam. Around 2008. UK made I think. 1
herfiehandbag Posted March 11, 2023 Posted March 11, 2023 (edited) 14 hours ago, AlQaholic said: Now why would a national forensic scientist even come close to involvement in the military purchasing empty boxes with bogus metal probes sticking out of them? She was, at the time, a very high profile government scientist. Quite possibly enlisted to support the purchase of the equipment by foolishly agreeing that it was a good idea. It will be interested to see if she actually profited from the purchase. Too clear up the scandal requires a fall guy. Once the fall has been "taken" then it is closed. Having her as the "fall guy" also "pays back" someone who has at times proved to be a bit of a thorn in various sides. Bit of a bonus? Mind you, I am surprised in a way that they are resurrecting the investigation so far down the line - all the Benzes will be parked at the back of the second hand car lots by now, and there are far more pressing problems, greater threats to society and bigger fish to fry - Chinese girls buying school uniforms and having their names embroidered on them for example! Edited March 11, 2023 by herfiehandbag 2
Reigntax Posted March 11, 2023 Posted March 11, 2023 Children’s toys? Rubbish!!! Not a single illegal golf ball entered Thailand while these great pieces of detection equipment were in use !!! 1
bangon04 Posted March 11, 2023 Posted March 11, 2023 but Thailand needs a celebrity influencer pathologist..... which country does not?
Confuscious Posted March 11, 2023 Posted March 11, 2023 "Never bite the hand that is feeding you". Confuscious
redwood1 Posted March 11, 2023 Posted March 11, 2023 (edited) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GT200 Even after the efficacy of the device was debunked by Thai and foreign scientists, Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha, then army chief, declared, "I affirm that the device is still effective."[33] The Post commented that, "The GT200 case was a unique scandal because the devices...seemed to fool only the people closely connected to their sale and purchase."[34] Edited March 12, 2023 by metisdead After pasting a reply format the text you have pasted. An easy way to do this is to click the "Paste as plain text instead" option at the bottom of the reply box.
The Old Bull Posted March 11, 2023 Posted March 11, 2023 Ten years from now I wonderwho they pinch for todays corruption? Depends on who is in power I quess.
hotchilli Posted March 11, 2023 Posted March 11, 2023 On 3/10/2023 at 9:19 AM, kotsak said: Someone higher up the food chain? Yep, elections are coming up and a scapegoat is urgently needed to deflect the truth. 1
Andycoops Posted March 11, 2023 Posted March 11, 2023 Thailand the world hub of fakes. Children's toys being used as bomb detectors operated by GI Joe's, another keystone fiasco.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now