Jump to content

NY grand jury votes to indict Donald Trump, sources tell CNN


Recommended Posts

Posted
12 hours ago, billd766 said:

But that does not make them right, though.

Many U.S. presidents, including Biden, have issued executive orders.  This is in direct conflict with the Constitution's separation of power.  During the first few weeks in office, Biden issued 30, yes 30, executive orders.  Maybe you have a different idea what "separation of power" means.

  • Sad 2
  • Haha 1
Posted

A recent poll of liberals reveals:

 

"He's been making us gag forever WITHOUT a gag order".

 

There's also a charge called contempt of court that he appears to absolutely itching for.

 

A ruling judge will say:

 

"Contempt? The feeling is mutual".

Posted (edited)
37 minutes ago, Hawaiian said:

During the first few weeks in office, Biden issued 30, yes 30, executive orders. 

What's your point?

 

U-S-Presidents-number-of-executive-orders-signed-1789-2022-Statista.thumb.png.2c1577bb68a0a2da13ff1bd170d78407.png

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1125024/us-presidents-executive-orders/#:~:text=The president who signed the,all executive orders ever published.

 

  

38 minutes ago, Hawaiian said:

This is in direct conflict with the Constitution's separation of power.

There is no specific provision in the United States Constitution for Executive Orders. However, Section 1 of Article II (the Executive Power) is generally viewed as granting authority for such orders. Section 1 says simply: “The Executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.” Sections 3 and 4 of Article II provide potential limitations on executive action (including Executive Orders) in stating that the President shall “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed” and in providing for impeachment and removal of the President in cases where the President is convicted of “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."

https://www.americanbar.org/groups/public_education/resources/teacher_portal/educational_resources/executive_orders/

 

Edited by Salerno
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, LaosLover said:

After Trump is sitting in a cell, he'll say:

 

"This is absolutely unpresidented"

Maybe they will find him an oval cell to make him feel at home!

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Hawaiian said:

Many U.S. presidents, including Biden, have issued executive orders.  This is in direct conflict with the Constitution's separation of power.  During the first few weeks in office, Biden issued 30, yes 30, executive orders.  Maybe you have a different idea what "separation of power" means.

Best really do some research to understand this better sir. 

 

Article II of the U.S. Constitution vests executive powers in the President, makes him the commander in chief, and requires that the President “shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” Laws can also give additional powers to the President.

 

While an executive order can have the same effect as a federal law under certain circumstances, Congress can pass a new law to override an executive order, subject to a presidential veto.

 

So has congress vetoed the executive orders Made by Trump or Biden?

Edited by ThailandRyan
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

 

6 minutes ago, placeholder said:

To date, there is no good evidence that Biden committed a crime. As for Hunter Biden, are you referring to the former non President and current non ex-President?

You mean the Presidents son receiving millions in a country where he doesn't speak the language in an industry he doesn't know? Now daddy is giving them BILLIONS?  that's all fine and dandy?

  • Sad 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Bkk Brian said:

Bragg made no political decision, the jury made the decision to indict, you can't even get that right...................

Have you read the Jurists opinions? you think a GJ in Manhattan knows more or is less biased than the others?  is pure manipulation and if the other way around YOU would wail and weep buckets. Keep politics CLEAN.

  • Sad 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
Just now, ThailandRyan said:

Keep on believing what you will, and then when the inevitable happens come back here and tell us he was framed...

Let's get this straight - you are believing he will do jail time?  seriously?  ok let's see

  • Sad 2
Posted
Just now, ThailandRyan said:

And Jared Kushner did not get Millions from the Saudis? Your out on a tiny limb that's going to break....

You mean the country USA cozies up to daily?  that Biden loves?  that you all fawn over? two wrongs don't make a right

  • Sad 2
  • Love It 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, BobBKK said:

Have you read the Jurists opinions? you think a GJ in Manhattan knows more or is less biased than the others?  is pure manipulation and if the other way around YOU would wail and weep buckets. Keep politics CLEAN.

It is clean when you prosecute folks for crimes committed and thus hold all accountable, much like Trump said he would do, but didn't, and then he went and committed crimes himself.....double edged sword sir. One that Trump sharpened and will cut him to the quick as well.

  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, BobBKK said:

Have you read the Jurists opinions? you think a GJ in Manhattan knows more or is less biased than the others?  is pure manipulation and if the other way around YOU would wail and weep buckets. Keep politics CLEAN.

Oh pleeeeeese............get a life!

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, BobBKK said:

Let's get this straight - you are believing he will do jail time?  seriously?  ok let's see

Jail time not so sure because of his status, yet it will probably be house arrest under the supervision of the secret service where he will not be allowed to leave the residence, much like wearing an ankle monitor...yet convicted yes.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, ThailandRyan said:

Jail time not so sure because of his status, yet it will probably be house arrest under the supervision of the secret service where he will not be allowed to leave the residence, much like wearing an ankle monitor...yet convicted yes.

Let's see? I think the case is very weak. To try to get a jury to believe a payment is a political problem is absurd. I think much depends on where the case is heard - NY is the worst prospect for Trump but he'll appeal and win I think.

  • Sad 2
  • Love It 1
Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, dotcalm said:

How Trump could reap $100M windfall from Stormy Daniels indictment

https://nypost.com/2023/03/31/trump-could-reap-100m-windfall-from-stormy-daniels-indictment

 

The left, always a day late and two or more steps behind.

I believe Trump is loving this.

If so a lot of Democrats will be happy. A diminished , or further diminished, candidate has the funds and passion from the maga punters, to win the Republican candidacy but then loses in a landslide when the average person can't fathom having 4 more years of that. 

Edited by Fat is a type of crazy
  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Topics

  • Latest posts...

    1. 4

      2 Yr Old Fino spluttering then stopping?

    2. 78

      Why are many people so partisan?

    3. 9

      Thailand Live Saturday 16 November 2024

    4. 77

      Official: Trump Nominates RFK Jr. for Health Secretary

    5. 0

      Shuttle Bus Crash at Phu Phek Temple Leaves One Dead, 25 Injured

    6. 9

      Thailand Live Saturday 16 November 2024

    7. 0

      Thai police ‘tweet’ out arrests in illegal bird trade bust

  • Popular in The Pub


×
×
  • Create New...