Jump to content

Military Reform in Progress


webfact

Recommended Posts

(1/2) MF spokesman Rangsiman Rome congratulates the Defence Ministry for revealing yest it has its own plan to reform the armed forces by reducing the # of generals by 50%, reduce the number of officers by 12,000 as well as ending compulsory military conscription by the yr 2027.

 

(2/2) Rangsiman said the party doesn't mind that the plans resemble that of his party's. In a not so related development, he calls for caretaker PM Gen Prayut to congratulate his party for winning the election. He added it's a normal practice and not too late if Prayut do it now.

 

https://twitter.com/KhaosodEnglish/status/1664192916238237696

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HaoleBoy said:

Between 2017 and 2021, the armed forces managed to decrease the number of military personnel by over 8,000

 

How many Generals were reduced in this time period if military personnel were reduced?
Sure seems like a knee-jerk reaction by the military gov. to MFP's plans ????  ????

 

Why must the General reduction wait until 2027?  Why wasn't this laid out for transparency before this?  MFP sure is setting an example about transparency and being upfront on issues.

you must wait till they retire as you can't kick them out

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, webfact said:

The number of generals would be cut by half in 2027, the deputy spokesman said.

How many will be promoted to General before then and get that lovely big fat pension? that tax payers foot the bill for even after they're dead and it carries on to their families

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

Reducing the number of generals to 12, would likely be good enough to accomplish all the needs of the army. And think of how much that would save. Trim the blubber. 

Much more practical and apt to replace the blubber. 

Trimming the excess fat would do little. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, h90 said:

you must wait till they retire as you can't kick them out

Of course you can kick them out.

 

It is called a reduction of force.

 

Only about 10 or a dozen active service generals are needed.

 

Simply dump the surplus ones as not required.

 

They get their pensions only, no military house, car. driver, servants. Just the same as retired generals world wide. If they want more money then get a real job, NOT in politics, and work for it using their military skills.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, webfact said:

Thailand‘s Defence Council has recently given the green light to a reform plan that aims to reduce the number of generals in the armed forces by 50% by 2027

It was the Council chaired by PM and Defense Minister Prayut who agreed (with himself?) in January 2022 to restructure the military by FY 2027. This time frame appears in part to accommodate retirement of "experts, specialists and specialists experts" who routinely hold general rank (what!) and would not be replaced in general rank. 

 

So it would seem that with the new government under the MFP coalition such restructuring is not locked into place, time-sensitive nor in details, unless the military is allowed Defense Minister control. It appears that it has been tradition that a former general get DM, likely more as a military/royalist check on any overly progressive government. It would be very democratic that the next DM be controlled by MFP et al.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, webfact said:

The armed forces had already reduced the number of military personnel by 8,000 from 2017- 2021, with the savings of 1.5 billion baht. By 2027, more 12,000 personnel will be reduced, which will help save 2.9 billion baht.

Keep going.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

600 (reduced) generals save THB 1'400'000'000 - quite an interesting amount, considering their actual postings into the Ministry of Inactive Posts. This clocks up to be almost THB 200'000/general/month. 
Explains possibly the lavish spending of the army on toys like aircraft carriers (parked in bright sunshine in Sattahip for the last 35 years), the three submarines (initially ordered without engines), the aircraft (the Thai air force wants to replace while the very same planes are being delivered to Ukraine by the NATO war chest), helicopters of which countless are not working anymore due to lack of ........ let's not go there. 

This tax generation, to feed those hungry army boys, might explain partly the doubled booze pricing, the exorbitant prices on pick-ups and vehicles etc. etc. 

With all that money they could make so much better use of it ............. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, HaoleBoy said:

Between 2017 and 2021, the armed forces managed to decrease the number of military personnel by over 8,000

 

How many Generals were reduced in this time period if military personnel were reduced?
Sure seems like a knee-jerk reaction by the military gov. to MFP's plans ????  ????

 

Why must the General reduction wait until 2027?  Why wasn't this laid out for transparency before this?  MFP sure is setting an example about transparency and being upfront on issues.

Why weren't you thrown out on the street by your employer from one day to the next?:coffee1:

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, billd766 said:

Reform of the military by the military?

 

Who said that the generals don't have a sense of humour?

 

They have had 9 years to do that, and only managed to reduce the force by 8,000 men.

And most of those are probably AWOL!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, billd766 said:

Of course you can kick them out.

 

It is called a reduction of force.

 

Only about 10 or a dozen active service generals are needed.

 

Simply dump the surplus ones as not required.

 

They get their pensions only, no military house, car. driver, servants. Just the same as retired generals world wide. If they want more money then get a real job, NOT in politics, and work for it using their military skills.

No you can't fire a civil servant that has not doing something wrong...no way and military officers over a specific rank are even more protected.
So you have to give them their salary till the are 60 or 65 and a job that is suitable for the rank.....or maybe you can send them home on full salary.
In other countries have been made deals to offer them a job in the police force, or give them some golden handshake for early retirement.

And you have as second problem, you can't stop promoting good younger people because you have too many sitting their already. The good one, will find a different job when they know they can't rise...so 20 years later you would have only idiots left.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, webfact said:

reinforcements of ..................................and the 3rd Cavalry Division will be scrapped

Well I never, Thailand's modern warfare:

 

image.jpeg.9f0d0d13bdb81d5ff4844d87bfa63461.jpeg

 

I suppose would be ideal for street protests?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PETERTHEEATER said:

What is the current ratio, in the Army, of Generals to other ranks?

The Thai military has more than 1,700 flag officers (generals and admirals), roughly one general for every 212 troops, a bloated number for a military of its size.

By comparison, the US military as of 1 November 2018 had 920 active duty general and flag officers (GFOs) for a force of 1,317,325 personnel, or one flag officer for every 1430 troops.

 

Royal Thai Armed Forces - Wikipedia

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

     Right from the get-go I see a problem.  Why is a high-ranking colonel  a mere spokesman???  And, not even the head spokesman, just a 'deputy'.  Should be a job for a lieutenant.  Still, looks like someone is trying to get earn some Brownie points with Move Forward so we'll see.  Plenty to weed out, that's for sure.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...