Jump to content

Move Forward MP being probed over past criminal record


Recommended Posts

Posted

Originally-from-3-7.png

 

The Move Forward party is conducting a background check into one of its constituency MPs, Nakornchai Khunnarong, after he was accused of having served time in prison on a theft conviction.

 

Nattawut Buaprathum, a deputy leader of the party, said today (Thursday) that the party’s legal experts are now investigating the case, adding that he has already talked with Nakornchai and asked for evidence to prove his innocence.

 

He said that the party had already checked the background of the MP, when he applied for electoral candidacy, and found he was clean. He added that he believes the MP did not falsify any evidence.

 

Full Story: https://www.thaipbsworld.com/move-forward-mp-being-probed-over-past-criminal-record/

 

Logo-top-.png

-- © Copyright Thai PBS 2023-07-27
 

- Cigna offers a range of visa-compliant plans that meet the minimum requirement of medical treatment, including COVID-19, up to THB 3m. For more information on all expat health insurance plans click here.

Posted
2 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

He said that the party had already checked the background of the MP, when he applied for electoral candidacy, and found he was clean. He added that he believes the MP did not falsify any evidence.

it's like a game of hot potato. 

Posted
14 hours ago, dinsdale said:

This is not good. Heroin. Conviction. Australia. No problem. TIT. What a bunch of ..........

What ???  Is this supposed to make sense?

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
3 hours ago, crazykopite said:

Isn’t there already a convicted drug dealer in the current government or am I misinformed 

At least one....

Posted

This implies that there is no register held by the RTP or Justice system .of criminal convictions within Thailand. This MP should not have to prove he has no criminal record. The accuser should already have evidence to hand from official sources.

However, there is no smoke without fire. An individual released after serving a  custodial sentence could change their name and be issued new ID in an attempt to conceal past criminal offences.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
14 hours ago, dinsdale said:

Let my retard self educate you.

Thailand court allows minister to keep post despite drug conviction

  • Published
    5 May 2021

Thailand's top court has allowed a government minister to keep his job, dismissing a bid to disqualify him over a past conviction for drug trafficking in Australia.

Thammanat Prompao was jailed for four years in 1994 for his role in a heroin smuggling case.

Thailand's Deputy Agriculture Minister Thammanat Prompao

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-57001674

Hence my post: "Heroin. Conviction. Australia. No problem." Seems I'm not the only retard on this site. I also have manners which it seems some on this site are rather lacking in.

Your original post is still nonsense. It has no link in any manner to what you indicate here. Jibberish.

Edited by drgoon
  • Sad 3
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, drgoon said:

Your original post is still nonsense. It has no link in any manner to what you indicate here. Jibberish.

Australian drug conviction[edit]

Manat Bophlom, now known as Thamanat Prompow, was convicted of conspiring to import heroin to Australia. The ruling was handed down on 31 March 1994 when he was sentenced to six years imprisonment. Manat served four years, then was deported upon his release.[19] BBC Thai reporters traveled to Downing Court in Sydney to view court records. Forbidden to make photocopies, they translated a relevant court document into Thai as proof of the conviction that Thamanat continues to deny.[20][21] Deputy Prime Minister Gen Prawit Wongsuwon asked the Thai people to leave the past in the past, saying the case has already been cleared up and that it was a matter concerning one person that has nothing to do with the nation.[22][23] Thamanat claims he will sue the Sydney Morning Herald for defamation,[24] although he declines to respond to their reporting.[25]

Edited by still kicking
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thamanat_Prompow#Australian_drug_conviction
  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted (edited)
On 7/28/2023 at 11:00 AM, drgoon said:

What ???  Is this supposed to make sense?

Yes it makes 100% sense to those who have some knowledge of the case.

 

Thamanat Prompow did 3 or 5 year in jail in Oz for drug offences, then deported. And found guilty of using fake documents and more.

 

A few years later he's a big shot in Thailand advising prayut.

 

A reporter asked prayut how can the guy be a member of prayut's party and be a member of  parliament if he's done time in Oz for drug offences etc?

 

Prayut replies, "It wasn't in Thailand so it doesn't matter".

 

 

Edited by scorecard
  • Like 1
Posted

The country I am visiting now voted on and elected and ex gorilla fighter , basically a world class drug dealer.  Politics make strange bed fellows to say the least.

Posted
14 hours ago, drgoon said:

Your original post is still nonsense. It has no link in any manner to what you indicate here. Jibberish.

Why don't you do an internet search for yourself and find out?

 

try looking here

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-57001674

or here

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thamanat_Prompow

maybe here

https://coconuts.co/bangkok/news/thai-cabinets-convicted-heroin-trafficker-also-bought-his-phd/

 

here are 3 links directly addressing the subject,

 

I simply typed in "convicted heroin smuggler in Thai government" and these 3 links came up straight away

 

Surely a simple internet search is not beyond your capability?

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
18 hours ago, proton said:

Also deputy PM allowed to stay on in spite of having a million dollar watch collection

Borrowed from a friend I heard.....

Posted
Just now, jacko45k said:

Borrowed from a friend I heard.....

Last time I saw mr toad being asked he claimed several friends, most friends lend a drill or a spanner, not watches costing that much. Investigation was a farce, all they had to do was find out who the watches were registered to.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...