Jump to content

Hunter Biden indicted on three federal gun charges


Social Media

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

The laptop info you use came from the FBI or Rudy?

The contents of the laptop have not been completely released.  The photos and other information have come from what the FBI has.  To the best of my knowledge neither Rudy or the Apple store employee has publicly released information from the laptop.  It was reported that Rudy turned over the hard drive he had to government officials but it is believed he made a copy.  So there would be at least three hard drives one in possession of the FBI, one with Rudy, and one with the Apple repair store.  Impossible to manipulate all three. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Longwood50 said:

The Democrats have the mantra that "no one is above the law' but the Hunter Biden saga shows they believe that to be a law for "thee and not for me"  

I know this, that if it was Trump who had the evidence on a laptop, the payments coming from Burisma, the money wired to him from the wife of a Russian mayor and deals linking millions in transactions with China he would be wearing an orange jump suit already.  

I agree that no one is above the law.  When laws apply only to some and not to others it undermines society and makes it essentially lawless.  The Hunter Biden story has seriously eroded public confidence that our regulatory agencies are not biased and undermines faith in them.  The same is true of the Trump story where the opposite has occured and agencies are used as weapons.  

Nixon and others used the agencies to target people with tax probes etc.  Herbert Hoover was known to keep secret dossiers on people to exert influence over them.  The practice of not prosecuting some and punishing others by concocting charges has gone on for a long time.  
You see the same here in Thailand.  It is a sad indictment of human behavior. 

 

Money lubricates the wheels of justice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Nice try at deflection. You are vilifying Joe Biden because of the behavior of one of his four children and a few relatives. That stinks.

Children are a reflection of their parents. Joe's constant lies reflect that. Like 2 peas in a pod.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"It is very unlikely that Hunter Biden would be charged with any of these crimes if his last name wasn’t Biden. Charges for possessing a firearm while under the influence of narcotics are rarely brought. False statement charges in this context are also rare."

 

Adding context to Mariotti's remarks, associate law professor Jake Charles shared government sentencing data that purportedly shows that "fewer than 350 people nationwide were sentenced for violating 922(g)(3) in 2021."

 

"DOJ will need to produce data in discovery, which will show that this is the most selective of prosecutions."

 

https://www.rawstory.com/legal-experts-on-biden-indictment/?traffic_source=Connatix

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Children are a reflection of their parents. Joe's constant lies reflect that. Like 2 peas in a pod.

Even if your assertion wasn't simplistic and simple-minded, how would that account for his son Beau and his 2 daughters? And, as you clearly don't recall, you also tarred Biden with the behavior of his brother and his niece.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ozimoron said:

"It is very unlikely that Hunter Biden would be charged with any of these crimes if his last name wasn’t Biden. Charges for possessing a firearm while under the influence of narcotics are rarely brought. False statement charges in this context are also rare."

 

Adding context to Mariotti's remarks, associate law professor Jake Charles shared government sentencing data that purportedly shows that "fewer than 350 people nationwide were sentenced for violating 922(g)(3) in 2021."

 

"DOJ will need to produce data in discovery, which will show that this is the most selective of prosecutions."

 

https://www.rawstory.com/legal-experts-on-biden-indictment/?traffic_source=Connatix

Equal justice for everyone should be the practice of DOJ.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every one of these political threads are the same. The left thinks they're right, and the right thinks they're right. No compromise, no seeing the other's point of view, no flexibility at all.

Just like the real world, everybody is so dug in their own beliefs there can be no middle ground.

 

Very sad we have come to this.  

 

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, placeholder said:

Even if your assertion wasn't simplistic and simple-minded, how would that account for his son Beau and his 2 daughters? And, as you clearly don't recall, you also tarred Biden with the behavior of his brother and his niece.

Beau, the one who died in Iraq?

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-repeats-false-claim-son-beau-died-iraq-states-ran-president-while-vice-president

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Longwood50 said:

The contents of the laptop have not been completely released.  The photos and other information have come from what the FBI has.  To the best of my knowledge neither Rudy or the Apple store employee has publicly released information from the laptop.  It was reported that Rudy turned over the hard drive he had to government officials but it is believed he made a copy.  So there would be at least three hard drives one in possession of the FBI, one with Rudy, and one with the Apple repair store.  Impossible to manipulate all three. 

 

 

So, the NYPost got a copy of the laptop 3 years ago, from Giuliani who got it 4 years ago.

Are you believing that:

- if there were any incriminating evidence on the laptop, the right-wing NYPost would not have already found it and published it?

- If there were any incriminating evidence on the laptop, Giuliani, whose mission for Trump has been to get dirt on Biden, would not have disclosed it?

 

Really?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there is another interesting twist to this issue: Does the second amendment allow the prohibition of ownership or possession of firearms simply due to a person's actions or activities for which he/she has not been convicted in a court of law? 

 

If the second amendment prevails, the question about drug use is unconstitutional and it becomes irrelevant how Hunter Biden answered it. This may go to the Supreme Court and put the gun-loving conservatives in a bind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, JonnyF said:

Unless it's Trump.

 

You lefties are hilarious. Defending Joe Biden and all the lies he tells. Claiming Hunter's crimes are minor indiscretions. So tough on guns, unless it's Hunter. So fixated on facts and the truth, unless it's Joe. The hypocrisy is astounding.

 

https://nypost.com/2023/09/12/biden-ground-zero-lie-latest-in-a-long-career-of-falsehoods/

 

 

 

Except when there’s evidence that doesn’t fit your any lefty narrative: 

 

5 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I have absolutely no issue with Hunter Biden being prosecuted under indictments handed down by a Grand Jury.

 

The indictments are in, prosecute and let a jury decide.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, impulse said:

In the leadup to the 2020 election, 54% of Dem voters thought it was " definitely or probably"

that the election would be rigged.  Crickets after it went their way...

 

https://thehill.com/hilltv/what-americas-thinking/518987-poll-bipartisan-agreement-on-the-possibility-of-a-rigged/

 

Hardly a vote of confidence in the election process from either side.

It's completely irrelevant. That was before elections, and at that time Democrat voters were worried about voter supression and foreign interference (from the linked article), not fraud. Republican voters believed they would be fraud (Trump was already making this claim before elections, as every time he expected to lose).

 

No precise claims have been made at that time. After claims have been made and debunked by recounts, audits, judges, etc... and several Republicans having stated or even testified that it was B.S., Republicans are still claiming elections have been rigged.

 

Facts: no significant voter suppression and no significant voter fraud occurred in 2020. Only on one side did opinions ultimately conform to facts.

Edited by candide
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, candide said:

It's completely irrelevant. That was before elections, and at that time Democrat voters were worried about voter supression and foreign interference (from the linked article), not massive fraud.

 

No precise claims have been made at that time. After claims have been made and debunked by recounts, audits, judges, etc... and several Republicans having stated or even testified that it was B.S., Republicans still believe elections have been rigged

Once again, you're confusing debunked with squelched. 

 

55% of Repubs (along with the 54% of Dems) believed going into the election that it was probably or definitely going to be rigged.  Why would they have a different belief afterward?

 

I don't claim to know if the shenanigans were sufficient to skew the results.  I'm even open to any evidence that shows the reason Trump is so angry is because he didn't get his money's worth.  But don't try to gaslight me into believing that there were no shenanigans.  No late night vote counting, no ballot mules, no dead voters, no vacant lots receiving hundred of ballots....

 

Edit:  I'd add that any long time Repub with presidential ambitions is probably beside himself pissed off that Trump has derailed his/her plans for 3 election cycles.  So I'm not surprised that there's Repubs that would prefer to see him go away.

 

Edited by impulse
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, impulse said:

In the leadup to the 2020 election, 54% of Dem voters thought it was " definitely or probably"

that the election would be rigged.  Crickets after it went their way...

 

https://thehill.com/hilltv/what-americas-thinking/518987-poll-bipartisan-agreement-on-the-possibility-of-a-rigged/

 

Hardly a vote of confidence in the election process from either side.

At that time everybody was well aware that Wikileaks had been leaking DNC emails daily and that those emails were coming from the Russians.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, JonnyF said:

Children are a reflection of their parents. Joe's constant lies reflect that. Like 2 peas in a pod.

Perhaps Hunter Biden is a reflection of the tragic events in his life.

 

His other parent having died in the same accident that killed his sister but in which he survived.

 

 


 

Edited by Chomper Higgot
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, JonnyF said:

Another deflection. You've got no defense for singling out Hunter Biden as the proof of some moral flaw in Joe Biden. He has 3 other children, 2 of them still living. And you sunk even lower when you invoked Biden's brother and niece as some kind of evidence of moral turpitude on Joe Biden's part. Bottom feeding much?

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...