Jump to content

Supreme Court dismisses Yingluck in abuse of power case


Recommended Posts

Posted
13 hours ago, BritManToo said:

Tell that to America!

 

Only fools and poor people stick around there to be locked up too... 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, hotchilli said:

The list is endless..... only in Thailand you find people willing to be paid to go blind.

 

Really? have you never been to the rest of Asia, Africa, South America?

  • Agree 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, herfiehandbag said:

The people voted in 2001. Thaksin's party won.

 

The people voted in 2005, Thaksin's party won.

 

The people voted in 2006, Thaksin's party was set to win, so there was a military coup.

 

The people voted in 2008. Thaksin's party won.

 

The military arranged the installation of the losing party in government.

 

The people voted in 2011. Thaksin's party won.

 

The people voted in 2014. Thaksin's party was set to win, so there was a military coup.

 

 

 

MFP won the last elections .

  • Agree 1
Posted

This personnel transfer "charge" was spurious, at best. Most think it was all they could come up with at the time.

 

 

I think she's still facing a 5-year sentence for the Rice Scheme. One assumes the King would reduce that to one year, or less.

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
14 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

 

I really don't want to hear that stupid argument anymore.

A politician does something wrong. Is that a political crime and it should not be prosecuted?

And if a politician commits a crime and the opposition publishes evidence about this crime and demands that that politician should be prosecuted, what then? Should we call that politically motivated prosecution and ignore it?

Or is a crime a crime, independent of who commits it and independent of how it was discovered? 

You pretend that what is grey and complex is black'nwhite & simple.

 

When Western governments make mistakes - as they all do - does the PM/Pres get charged with criminal actions?  Perhaps in Usofa but not in real democracies.

  • Like 2
  • Confused 2
Posted
1 hour ago, zyphodb said:

 

If you were in her shoes at the time, do you honestly believe you'd do any different? 

 

Please don't apologise for them, they are crooks!

  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
48 minutes ago, Accidental Tourist said:

And so the cycle of corruption and misused power ist completed 

 

Continued, surely?

Posted
Just now, Eric Loh said:

I am confused who you refering to. Here the list for you to contemplate.

- Rolls-Royce and Thai Airways bribery case. Case grind to a halt

- Red Bulll heir mowed down Police Senior sgt - nothing heard

- Bangkok police chief received montly payment of 50k since 2017 - matter closed

- Theft of funds for the poor - nothing heard

- Suthep's police station corruption case - acquitted

By the way Yingluck not charged and convicted for corruption. You can pinned malfeasance on all governments if you need a political expedient reason. 

Does the name Shinawatra ring a bell? Who is the topic of THIS OP??? 

  • Agree 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, 2baht said:

Does the name Shinawatra ring a bell? Who is the topic of THIS OP??? 

Sure does ring louder for you as though corruption is a novelty in Thailand.  

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Posted

And still no charges for her (OK, the Shinawtra family's) massively corrupt rice-pledging scheme that almost bankrupted the country. If I was loong Prayut, the man who removed her from office, I think I'd be looking for an escape route from Thailand ASAP.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...