On 4/13/2024 at 6:14 AM, Danderman123 said:

That electoral offense has not been proven in a court law, which may be Trump's main defense.

By law, it doesn't have to be proven.

7 minutes ago, transam said:

Yes, she has been out of McTrump's dodgy embarrassing picture for quite a while.........🤔

There's a rumour going round Melania is doing the horizontal mambo with a former Secret Service agent assigned to her as a bodyguard.

I am wondering if Barron Trump has ever had a DNA test, he doesn't look anything like Trump when compared with photos of a young Trump.

If true, Trump as a cuckold would be poetic justice.

1 minute ago, Lacessit said:

There's a rumour going round Melania is doing the horizontal mambo with a former Secret Service agent assigned to her as a bodyguard.

I am wondering if Barron Trump has ever had a DNA test, he doesn't look anything like Trump when compared with photos of a young Trump.

If true, Trump as a cuckold would be poetic justice.

 

Source: Reddit...

20 minutes ago, herfiehandbag said:

As far as I can tell, she is gone already!

IMO she is probably staying in the background at the moment, although I did read that in response to the troubles which trump is going through, she did say something along the lines of, "that's his business/problem not mine".

 

She's more than likely to hang on in for the sake of her lifestyle and money, after all as someone else has mentioned on another thread, "do you really believe that as a beautiful young woman she had pictures of a fat orange old man on her wall?"

 

No, it was purely about the money and probably still is.

2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Nor was anyone caught with a gun inside the Capital building, correct? 

You are 100% correct.

2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

 

 

That the story was published once and killed is not relevant to my post. 

In the publishing world, the term "killed" means "not published". So, your statement makes no sense.

5 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

In the publishing world, the term "killed" means "not published". So, your statement makes no sense.

Sorry. What I said was: "In any event, the story was killed, and Biden said it was not true. Again, how is that not, per your definition, election interference? 

 

What I should have said was: In any event, after the story's initial publication, it was pulled, and other papers refused to print it and claimed it was unsubstantiated, and of course Biden said it was not true. Again, how is that not, per your definition, election interference?

 

I went on to say that: "By your definition of election interference as withholding information from the electorate, anyone that chooses to not run a story that paints their favored candidate in a negative or positive light, is interfering with the election, correct?"

 

And: "Incidentally, the FBI had the laptop and knew it was authentic prior to the election." 

 

And: "That the story was published once and killed is not relevant to my post." ++v

 

Your turn

11 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Sorry. What I said was: "In any event, the story was killed, and Biden said it was not true. Again, how is that not, per your definition, election interference? 

 

What I should have said was: In any event, after the story's initial publication, it was pulled, and other papers refused to print it 

The NY Post "pulled" the October 14, 2020 laptop story? Really?

 

Did they also pull the followup story the next day?

 

If Joe Biden claimed the allegations in the story were false (they were), why would that be election interference?

1 hour ago, Danderman123 said:

The NY Post "pulled" the October 14, 2020 laptop story? Really?

 

Did they also pull the followup story the next day?

 

If Joe Biden claimed the allegations in the story were false (they were), why would that be election interference?

You claimed that your definition of election interference is withholding information from the electorate. Is that correct? 

 

 So clearly, anyone that chooses to not run a story that paints their favored candidate in a negative or positive light, is interfering with the election. Is that not also, correct? 

 

The New Your Times refused to print the story, so, by your definition the NYT interfered with the election. 

 

 

2 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

You claimed that your definition of election interference is withholding information from the electorate. Is that correct? 

 

 So clearly, anyone that chooses to not run a story that paints their favored candidate in a negative or positive light, is interfering with the election. Is that not also, correct? 

 

The New Your Times refused to print the story, so, by your definition the NYT interfered with the election. 

 

 

I would prefer to use the legal definition of election interference, not something made up in a discussion. Trump is charged with false business entries to cover up the Stormy Daniels story.

 

the rest of your post is just crazy, so I will let it go.

Reportedly, Trump used yesterday's meeting with his attorneys to rant about Jimmy Kimmel and windmills.

 

Nut job.

6 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

I would prefer to use the legal definition of election interference, not something made up in a discussion. Trump is charged with false business entries to cover up the Stormy Daniels story.

 

the rest of your post is just crazy, so I will let it go.

So, what is the legal definition of election interference?

 

Clearly it can't be covering up a story, stories are covered up all the time. 

 

We all know Cohen's convictions had nothing to do with election interference. 

 

2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

So, what is the legal definition of election interference?

 

Clearly it can't be covering up a story, stories are covered up all the time. 

 

We all know Cohen's convictions had nothing to do with election interference. 

 

Watch and learn.

On 4/12/2024 at 6:50 PM, bubblegum said:

Not to bash his GOP believes (if he has any) but I really think that IF he goes to trial on Monday and the trial lasts for several days then at some point I think he will simply lose control. He might even be held in contemp. Just based on the man he is, his past (pampered) live and temper.

 

It's lasted more than 7 days now, so when is the "losing it" going to start?

 

Seems in a pretty good mood lately. SCOTUS going as well as can be expected, up in the polls, friendly witness in the absurd hush money trial. Loss in the E. Jean Caroll suit, maybe he'll continue appeal.

 

Doing some campaigning:

 

Before he went into court in New York City on Thursday morning, Donald Trump stopped by to talk to some construction workers, shake some hands, sign some hats, and make some news.

As I pointed out, Trump said after shaking hands and signing hats that Biden is so bad that a Republican stands a chance of winning New York in the November presidential election: "I think we have a good chance of winning New York."

     --https://pjmedia.com/victoria-taft/2024/04/25/democrats-may-regret-tying-trump-in-court-after-his-latest-announcement-n4928500

 

Contempt charges being decided soon, might have to pay a little. 🙂 But now Cohen say's he's going silent.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On 4/18/2024 at 12:04 PM, Sticky Rice Balls said:

Would be even more ironic if people such as yourself admit you fell for the big lie...wanna bet on who wins???..step up...put money on it...call me out.....................LOL

So many big lies on both sides that I don't know which one you mean.

 

I'll always support the man that doesn't start wars or collude in atrocities.

On 4/18/2024 at 5:39 PM, Lacessit said:

There's a rumour going round Melania is doing the horizontal mambo with a former Secret Service agent assigned to her as a bodyguard.

I am wondering if Barron Trump has ever had a DNA test, he doesn't look anything like Trump when compared with photos of a young Trump.

If true, Trump as a cuckold would be poetic justice.

There's a rumour going round Biden was illegally making money from foreign governments while VP.

If true, Biden as a convict would be poetic justice.

 

2 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

There's a rumour going round Biden was illegally making money from foreign governments while VP.

If true, Biden as a convict would be poetic justice.

 

No, that was his son getting rich and kicking back to him, but he didn't know about it so it was all legal. 

 

And the statutes have run out on them anyways so nah nah nah!