6 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

Yes. And the case is under appeal. And part of the appeal is that the Judge excluded evidence such that the jury might not have found some witnesses as credible.

Please dont interject reality into the fun

4 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Please dont interject reality into the fun

To you trolling is fun? Gawd.

9 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Exactly dude. Your worthless opinion as to me and anybody else, espcially over the net, is meaningless. Im never stressed, nice bowl of Orange Kush, a super sweet mango (.80 cents a kilo), 97 degrees, swimming pool. Most of you TDS kids, except for your antisemites and terr lovers are generally harmless, so the babbling is more amusing than anyhting.

 

 

Meanwhile your idol sits docilely in the courtroom, sometimes sleeping, while his lawyers provide a weak defense.

 

Do you think he'll testify?

16 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

Yes. And the case is under appeal. And part of the appeal is that the Judge excluded evidence such that the jury might not have found some witnesses as credible.

IMHO, Trump's appeals are the real show, that's how he avoids jail or big fines.

36 minutes ago, HappyExpat57 said:

Any time one of you truth deniers brings up "Fox," I have to remind you about the lawsuit that cost them almost $1 BILLION for being LIARS, and that there is another lawsuit in the works for almost $3 BILLION for the same thing. I understand your real agenda is to troll, but we will call you on it each and every time.

Please continue.  We’re always looking forward to a good laugh.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/media/msnbcs-nicolle-wallace-rejects-durham-report-career-built-upon-fraud-russiagate
 

https://www.foxnews.com/media/msnbc-rachel-maddow-quickly-dismissed-durham-report-after-spending-years-pushing-collusion-narrative

4 minutes ago, G_Money said:

Please continue.  We’re always looking forward to a good laugh.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/media/msnbcs-nicolle-wallace-rejects-durham-report-career-built-upon-fraud-russiagate
 

https://www.foxnews.com/media/msnbc-rachel-maddow-quickly-dismissed-durham-report-after-spending-years-pushing-collusion-narrative

Won't waste time on anyone using "Fox" in any way, shape or form.

20 minutes ago, HappyExpat57 said:

Won't waste time on anyone using "Fox" in any way, shape or form.

Your posts is telling a different story.

 

Is CNN really who you should be following?  I would hope not.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnn-anderson-cooper-says-network-morale-was-hurt-drama-recent-years

 

https://www.foxnews.com/media/ex-cnn-producer-john-griffin-sentenced-19-years-child-sex-crimes

 

 

4 minutes ago, G_Money said:

Your posts is telling a different story.

 

Is CNN really who you should be following?  I would hope not.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnn-anderson-cooper-says-network-morale-was-hurt-drama-recent-years

 

https://www.foxnews.com/media/ex-cnn-producer-john-griffin-sentenced-19-years-child-sex-crimes

 

 

Go away like the bad smell you try and use as a source.

57 minutes ago, HappyExpat57 said:

To you trolling is fun? Gawd.

Im not the one trolling silly goose, its watching you guys. I love clown shows.

So, things are looking grim for Trump. He told his lawyers to claim he never had sex with Stormy Daniels. That was a bad move.

7 hours ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

"I used to try cases for a living. I still have a pretty good sense of what evidence is relevant, what is prejudicial and what is completely over-the-top inadmissible. What the judge is letting in today in the Trump trial in NYC will be remembered as a dark stain on our judicial system, reminiscent of corrupt dictatorships. Shame on the prosecution for undermining our judicial system," David Friedman, a lawyer and former U.S. ambassador to Israel during the Trump administration, posted on X. 

David M. Friedman - Wikipedia

Is this the David Friedman to whom you refer?  I see no record of him ever trying cases and his speciality seems to be bankruptcy.

As an adviser to 45's presidential campaign who was then given the position of Ambassador to Israel he might be a little biased?

7 hours ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

"I used to try cases for a living. I still have a pretty good sense of what evidence is relevant, what is prejudicial and what is completely over-the-top inadmissible. What the judge is letting in today in the Trump trial in NYC will be remembered as a dark stain on our judicial system, reminiscent of corrupt dictatorships. Shame on the prosecution for undermining our judicial system," David Friedman, a lawyer and former U.S. ambassador to Israel during the Trump administration, posted on X. 

David M. Friedman - Wikipedia

Is this the David Friedman to whom you refer?  I see no record of him ever trying cases and his speciality seems to be bankruptcy.

As an adviser to 45's presidential campaign who was then given the position of Ambassador to Israel he might be a little biased?

54 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Meanwhile your idol sits docilely in the courtroom, sometimes sleeping, while his lawyers provide a weak defense.

 

Do you think he'll testify?

Idol? You mean the Great Orange Boogeyman.? I like him because he stirs up the woke, rascist, terrorist supporting, war mongering, jew hating, elitist, spook, power mad, mysognistic, inluencers and shills like no other. 

 

My Idol is his policies. Drill baby drill. Deport baby deport. Pay your fair share you greedy Eurotrash. Screw climate change. Law and order. Screw Russia, Ukraine and China. Eat sanctions, mullah. etc.

Even to have a laughingstock as Candidate Americans are still so narrow minded to vote for this cheater and criminal?😳 Unbelievable 🙏

2 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

Trump's campaign manager provided private polling data to the Russians to allow them to micro-target US voters 

well, Killton won the popular vote apparently, so their 'micro targeting' 🤡 didnt work 

9 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

well, Killton won the popular vote apparently, so their 'micro targeting' 🤡 didnt work 

The micro-targeting from the Trump campaign polling data enabled them to eke out wins in swing states - barely.

 

Which is the point of micro-targeting voters, you do it if you don't think you are going to win the popular vote.

He's in court and charged with 34 criminal offences, and there are other separate court cases pending.

 

The first time a former American president has been tried on criminal charges.

 

He has a foul mouth, he is not articulate, he lies, and it's been proven constantly, he's a misogynist, he's a draft dodger, he doesn't know how to communicate on the world stage, he's brash and he's tacky. He encouraged the storming of the Capitol with his baseless claims of vote rigging, He has zero credibility.

 

Yet, many of you defend and defend him, pointing and using ifs, buts and maybes'

 

Does the USA want such a cretin on the world stage allegedly speaking for a superpower and with him as CIC?

 

And you guys are on AN talking about the plusses and minuses of an adult porn film star and her testimony.

 

Is it 350 million people you have, and this is what you want to bring to the table as your designated leader to speak on behalf of the American people?

7 minutes ago, Scouse123 said:

Is it 350 million people you have, and this is what you want to bring to the table as your designated leader to speak on behalf of the American people?

I voted against him twice -- and in 2016 I voted for Bernie Sanders in the Florida primary who may have been the better 2016 Democratic candidate.

Trump is claiming he never had sex with Stormy. She is saying he did.

 

If he never had sex with her, why would he shell out $130,000 on a baseless claim, when he is known for litigating everything?

 

OTOH, she would have the perfect defense if she was sued for defamation, and described his genitalia accurately.........

4 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Were you there? If not, got a source for that?

Judge in hush money case told defense attorney to stop Trump from 'audibly cursing' during Stormy Daniels' testimony

 

53 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Idol? You mean the Great Orange Boogeyman.? I like him because he stirs up the woke, rascist, terrorist supporting, war mongering, jew hating, elitist, spook, power mad, mysognistic, inluencers and shills like no other. 

 

My Idol is his policies. Drill baby drill. Deport baby deport. Pay your fair share you greedy Eurotrash. Screw climate change. Law and order. Screw Russia, Ukraine and China. Eat sanctions, mullah. etc.

Policies. Give me a break. Didn't know that you are comedian. 

4 hours ago, jerrymahoney said:

Prosecutor Susan Hoffinger countered that "the details of her story are important" while saying the prosecution will not ask about "certain details that might be too salacious." She said Daniels would be asked to testify about "how she ended up engaging in a sexual act."

 

"It's not going to include any details about genitalia or anything of that nature," Hoffinger said.

 

https://www.cbsnews.com/live-updates/trump-trial-testimony-bookkeeping-gag-order-contempt/

But of course once the witness is sworn in, on the stand and speaking any attempt to prevent her giving a ‘truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth’, might wander into the realms of witness interference.

 

Daniels is reported to have been speaking at pace, and perhaps has a different idea of what constitutes ‘too much detail’ than do others.

 

 

9 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

OTOH, she would have the perfect defense if she was sued for defamation, and described his genitalia accurately.........

Hearsay. Another girl who did have non-adulterous sex with Trump during the almost 6 years between his 2nd and 3rd marriage could have told her.

1 hour ago, HappyExpat57 said:

Go away like the bad smell you try and use as a source.

Voice your complaints to the moderators.  

 

Unless otherwise directed Fox is a qualified source on the forum.

 

 

9 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

Hearsay. Another girl who did have non-adulterous sex with Trump during the almost 6 years between his 2nd and 3rd marriage could have told her.

It would be interesting to see polling about who is telling the truth, Trump or Ms. Daniels.

4 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

What was on display in court was Trump’s depravity.

 

 

Perhaps you should redirect your “depravity” lecture to a certain CNN individual.

 

He could certainly use it.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/media/ex-cnn-producer-john-griffin-sentenced-19-years-child-sex-crimes
 

https://www.foxnews.com/us/ex-cnn-producer-settles-lawsuit-sex-acts-9-year-old-girl

Just now, G_Money said:

Perhaps you should redirect your “depravity” lecture to a certain CNN individual.

 

He could certainly use it.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/media/ex-cnn-producer-john-griffin-sentenced-19-years-child-sex-crimes
 

https://www.foxnews.com/us/ex-cnn-producer-settles-lawsuit-sex-acts-9-year-old-girl

I see you’ve gone full blown whataboutary.

 

 

 

 

 

 

9 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

It would be interesting to see polling about who is telling the truth, Trump or Ms. Daniels.

There are only twelve opinions that matter.

4 minutes ago, G_Money said:

Perhaps you should redirect your “depravity” lecture to a certain CNN individual.

 

He could certainly use it.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/media/ex-cnn-producer-john-griffin-sentenced-19-years-child-sex-crimes
 

https://www.foxnews.com/us/ex-cnn-producer-settles-lawsuit-sex-acts-9-year-old-girl

So, you think any of Trump's adulterous acts are okay, because someone else somewhere else committed sex crimes?

 

Really?

1 hour ago, HappyExpat57 said:

Go away like the bad smell you try and use as a source.

And can you provide proof/links that the links I provided from Fox are false?

 

I didn’t think so.

 

Next.