Popular Post atpeace Posted June 7 Popular Post Share Posted June 7 (edited) 21 minutes ago, bubblegum said: The same dumb Maga folks defending Russia I'm not a MAGA but you calling someone dumb because they have a different opinion is idiotic. Grow up child and try to make a coherent point other than calling others infantile names. Edited June 7 by atpeace 1 1 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atpeace Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 24 minutes ago, johng said: What next country ? according to the MSM he is mortally wounded just trying to take 25% of Ukraine, his economy is in tatters no one will buy his oil, gas or other natural resources the sanctions worked brilliantly ( destroying Germany ) I don't think he even wants to take any more of Ukraine but may be forced to so as to have a buffer on the western border. So the sanctions worked? BTW. Germany isn't destroyed. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thesetat2013 Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 13 hours ago, Tug said: I doubt it nato has no interest in occupying Russia nato does have an interest in forcing Russia to respect other nations borders and sovereignty though Would that not depend on who Russia is helping with weapons? In other news China seems to be supporting Russia these days. It would not be difficult for Russia to send a few long range nukes to N. Korea or some other nation who cares nothing about dropping a nuke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bradiston Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 5 hours ago, johng said: The US and allies are pushing the whole world toward nuclear armageddon All due to US, EU, NATO policies China and India say thanks very much for the cheap energy blowing up the nordstream pipelines might not have been such a good idea ehh ? Everything wrong. Fail. 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post bradiston Posted June 7 Popular Post Share Posted June 7 5 hours ago, bradiston said: Oh ok, let me be as plain as I can be. Without Putin there would be no war in Ukraine, no oil, gas, animal feed, grain and fertilizer crisis. No sanctions. No threat to Russia. There never was one in any case. He just invented it all. Yes, for the confused, get rid of Putin, problem solved. Nothing to do with NATO. He's been attacking Ukraine since 2014 when he stole Crimea. 1 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bradiston Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 5 hours ago, johng said: To the person who does not know what wars the US have instigated please go and do some of your own research..I repeat again that doing your own research does not turn you into a MAGA moron and in your case Google is most certainly your friend (CIA NSA) What evidence do you have that the CIA or the NSA sponsor or influence Google search results? Are you familiar with their algorithms? If so, you'd better keep quiet. NDAs and all that. And if somebody challenges an assertion made by you, you either provide evidence or withdraw it or see it dismissed. Why should we do your homework for you? That which can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. If you're too bone idle to come up with your links, why should we? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bradiston Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 12 hours ago, bradiston said: With Putin at the helm they're a fricking nuisance. His attack on Ukraine has triggered massive global problems, particularly in Europe. Regime change is all that's required. Somewhere along the line he has to be taken out. No war required. 3 more idiot emojis 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gweiloman Posted June 8 Share Posted June 8 15 hours ago, tgw said: Quite the contrary. Western leaders don't think Putin is a madman. They think he is a megalomaniac, evil, murderous and criminal dictator. But a rational one. And he is playing the bluff. Sadly, his bluffs have worked partially. Maybe you could demonstrate that "rightly perceived threat against Ruzzia's existence by the US". No amount of evidence or proof or facts will convince you so let’s not waste time playing stupid games. You hate Putin/Russia so much that you can’t even bring yourself to spell it correctly. Your prerogative of course. I couldn’t care less. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Gweiloman Posted June 8 Popular Post Share Posted June 8 13 hours ago, 0ffshore360 said: Can you kindly refer me to whomsoever it is that enables, permits , allows you to constantly post inflammatory flaming trolling personal insult on members who are entitled to post opinion based on thoughtful consideration of various factors as opposed to your own sycophantic ocd regurgitations typical of a core of fascist enablers so very evident on this forum? Maybe e has friends in high places… It takes a “special” kind to spend 12 hrs a day online and post tens of thousands of content and substance free micro posts. I can’t. I have a life. 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Gweiloman Posted June 8 Popular Post Share Posted June 8 15 hours ago, Hummin said: You can comment on his analysis instead of using childish laughing emotions and just state he lack of credibillity. That’s usually all some posters can come up with when they can’t counter facts. A lot of well respected scholars, academics, military experts have given their reasons and analysis of the events but most are just labelled as Kremlin apologists and propagandists and even God forbid, Reds… lol. On the other side, you have CNN, MSNBC, BBC, the State Department, Baerbock, Kallas… lol. Here is one of the best takes on the conflict I have come across. I have not heard of this person before but he is one hell of a smart cookie. Might be too long and too honest for some though 1 1 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoDisplayName Posted June 8 Share Posted June 8 17 hours ago, transam said: Didn't Russia (USSR) supply arms and more to Vietnam, N.Korea when the West were trying to help the free south's......🤭 Don't you see the similarity........ Was that the 'free' south that cancelled elections and refused to carry out international accords when they realized 'their guy' wasn't going to win? Wasn't that the illegitimate autocrat ruler that killed or imprisoned the opposition? Why, yes. Yes, I do see the similarities. Perfect example of why we shouldn't meddle in foreign nations' internal affair and initiate regime-changes. Let's hope the US regime doesn't send in the troops after the inevitable Tonkin Bay false flag. I don't want my country to be responsible for the deaths of another million civilians. Do we need to wait for the Orthodox Catholic monk to self-immolate protesting persecution by the 'free' regime in the streets of keeeeeeeeeve? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candide Posted June 8 Share Posted June 8 5 minutes ago, NoDisplayName said: Was that the 'free' south that cancelled elections and refused to carry out international accords when they realized 'their guy' wasn't going to win? Wasn't that the illegitimate autocrat ruler that killed or imprisoned the opposition? Why, yes. Yes, I do see the similarities. Perfect example of why we shouldn't meddle in foreign nations' internal affair and initiate regime-changes. Let's hope the US regime doesn't send in the troops after the inevitable Tonkin Bay false flag. I don't want my country to be responsible for the deaths of another million civilians. Do we need to wait for the Orthodox Catholic monk to self-immolate protesting persecution by the 'free' regime in the streets of keeeeeeeeeve? Ridiculous false equivalence..... 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
transam Posted June 8 Share Posted June 8 9 minutes ago, NoDisplayName said: Was that the 'free' south that cancelled elections and refused to carry out international accords when they realized 'their guy' wasn't going to win? Wasn't that the illegitimate autocrat ruler that killed or imprisoned the opposition? Why, yes. Yes, I do see the similarities. Perfect example of why we shouldn't meddle in foreign nations' internal affair and initiate regime-changes. Let's hope the US regime doesn't send in the troops after the inevitable Tonkin Bay false flag. I don't want my country to be responsible for the deaths of another million civilians. Do we need to wait for the Orthodox Catholic monk to self-immolate protesting persecution by the 'free' regime in the streets of keeeeeeeeeve? Didn't Russia (USSR) supply weapons to those wanting Communism forced on the South in Vietnam and N.Korea........ ? Isn't the free world helping Ukraine remain a sovereign nation from the Russian aggressor...?...........🤗 No need to show me a bloke setting himself on fire, I am not religious, perhaps you are....................🤔 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johng Posted June 8 Share Posted June 8 14 hours ago, bradiston said: What evidence do you have that the CIA or the NSA sponsor or influence Google search results? Here read this one tiny weeny clue for you from all the way back in 2010 https://www.wired.com/2010/07/exclusive-google-cia/ There are lots more clues if you care to read..but you should really do your own homework and anyway I'm too bone idle to be spoon feeding you. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johng Posted June 8 Share Posted June 8 (edited) 17 hours ago, atpeace said: So the sanctions worked? BTW. Germany isn't destroyed. No they backfired but the Mainstream media would have you believe that they have crippled Russia. Germany destroyed economically due to high energy costs their manufacturing industries are suffering badly. Edited June 8 by johng elaborated a bit more 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
transam Posted June 8 Share Posted June 8 15 minutes ago, johng said: Here read this one tiny weeny clue for you from all the way back in 2010 https://www.wired.com/2010/07/exclusive-google-cia/ There are lots more clues if you care to read..but you should really do your own homework and anyway I'm too bone idle to be spoon feeding you. Anyone that follows up your stuff is a mug or Red......... 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post bradiston Posted June 8 Popular Post Share Posted June 8 1 hour ago, johng said: Here read this one tiny weeny clue for you from all the way back in 2010 https://www.wired.com/2010/07/exclusive-google-cia/ There are lots more clues if you care to read..but you should really do your own homework and anyway I'm too bone idle to be spoon feeding you. Rubbish 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johng Posted June 8 Share Posted June 8 1 hour ago, bradiston said: Rubbish Up to you, obviously you don't like doing your own homework here some more rubbish you won't find this info on Wikipedia !! https://www.kitklarenberg.com/p/how-cia-and-nsa-created-google https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/cias-direct-involvement-foundation-google-abishekapriyan-g https://productivityhub.org/2019/10/04/how-the-cia-made-google/ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roo Island Posted June 8 Share Posted June 8 What a horrible leader. Too bad the people in Russia can't vote him out. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bradiston Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 To the admins. There seems to be a plethora of confused emojis in this thread. Can I suggest removing it altogether? What purpose does it serve? If somebody doesn't understand a comment, what's wrong with saying so? Like, "Hold on, I don't get it"? That and the sad one. They just create confusion, which I guess is why they're used. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
novacova Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 6 minutes ago, bradiston said: To the admins. There seems to be a plethora of confused emojis in this thread. Can I suggest removing it altogether? What purpose does it serve? If somebody doesn't understand a comment, what's wrong with saying so? Like, "Hold on, I don't get it"? That and the sad one. They just create confusion, which I guess is why they're used. Don’t put too much thought into it, there’s just a lot of sad and confused folks around here. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johng Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 2 minutes ago, bradiston said: There seems to be a plethora of confused emojis in this thread. Can I suggest removing it altogether? I gave you another confused emoji the purpose is that I'm confused why you want to limit expression on the forum sometimes people just want a quick way to express their view without having to write War and Peace. Give me a confused or sad emoji if you like it doesn't matter just an anonymous forum on the Ethernet. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FritsSikkink Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 On 6/7/2024 at 5:49 PM, transam said: You cannot back up your post then, thought not.......... Not always instigated but involved: List of wars involving the United States - Wikipedia 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
transam Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 28 minutes ago, FritsSikkink said: Not always instigated but involved: List of wars involving the United States - Wikipedia "Involving".....................🤣 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FritsSikkink Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 5 minutes ago, transam said: "Involving".....................🤣 One of many examples: Bay of pigs, instigating 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
transam Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 3 minutes ago, FritsSikkink said: One of many examples: Bay of pigs, instigating If friendly countries ask for assistance, why not. I am sure Taiwan will get assistance too... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johng Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 (edited) On 6/8/2024 at 6:12 PM, Roo Island said: Too bad the people in Russia can't vote him out. They just very recently voted him to remain in office !! Edited June 11 by johng 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johng Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 14 minutes ago, FritsSikkink said: One of many examples: Bay of pigs, instigating Iraq "weapons of mass destruction" !!!! instigating. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bradiston Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 49 minutes ago, johng said: I gave you another confused emoji the purpose is that I'm confused why you want to limit expression on the forum sometimes people just want a quick way to express their view without having to write War and Peace. Give me a confused or sad emoji if you like it doesn't matter just an anonymous forum on the Ethernet. Dunno. Been on this forum for years. I never used a sad or confused emoji. I don't see the point. If you've something to say, say it. Cue at least 1 of each. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 Just ignore him. His entire game is threats. Get on with the business of winning against him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now