.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Do people get island fever living on an island?
.thumb.jpg.07d3893e233f9af17b17b40cc153f571.jpg)
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
Announcements
-
Topics
-
-
Latest posts...
-
3
THAILAND LIVE Thailand Live Monday 23 September 2024
Suspected Drunk Drivers in Thailand to Face New Testing Methods File photo Thailand has introduced new regulations allowing police to use urine or blood tests to determine the alcohol levels of drivers suspected of being drunk if they refuse to take a breathalyser test. Full story: https://aseannow.com/topic/1338834-suspected-drunk-drivers-in-thailand-to-face-new-testing-methods/ -
0
Suspected Drunk Drivers in Thailand to Face New Testing Methods
File photo Thailand has introduced new regulations allowing police to use urine or blood tests to determine the alcohol levels of drivers suspected of being drunk if they refuse to take a breathalyser test. This announcement, published in the Royal Gazette, updates previous regulations from 1994 and 2017, which relied mainly on breathalyser tests. The revised laws aim to modernise alcohol testing procedures and enhance the effectiveness of legal measures to combat drunk driving. The regulation permits police officers to either collect urine samples on-site or escort drivers to a hospital for blood tests when breathalyser tests are refused. Officers are instructed to secure drivers' consent before conducting urine tests and to provide a private and secure location for the sample collection. They will also maintain control over the sample collection area to prevent any tampering. The collected urine samples will be sent to nearby hospitals for laboratory testing. For blood tests, drivers refusing breathalysers will be taken to a hospital for medical examination. According to the new regulation, drivers found with more than 50 milligrammes of alcohol in their blood—and 20 milligrammes for those under 20 years old—will be charged with drunk driving, reported Bangkok Post. Additionally, the law states that drivers refusing to undergo medical examinations without a valid reason will be presumed to have exceeded the legal blood alcohol limit. In such cases, the medical professional will document the refusal and notify the police to initiate further investigation. Earlier this year, the government approved an amendment to Thailand's Land Transportation Act, allowing alcohol level tests up to three hours after a driver has been stopped by police. Karom Polpornklang, the then-deputy spokesman for the government, noted that the amended law would expand the methods available to identify drunk drivers beyond the traditional use of breathalysers. -- 2024-09-23 -
0
A Grim Warning for Global Sea Levels The Secrets of the Doomsday Glacier
Scientists probing deep beneath Antarctica’s Thwaites Glacier, ominously known as the "Doomsday Glacier," have uncovered alarming signs of accelerated melting, which could trigger catastrophic sea level rise. Using advanced technology, such as ice-breaking ships and underwater robots, researchers from the International Thwaites Glacier Collaboration (ITGC) have revealed that the glacier may be on an irreversible path to collapse. Since 2018, the ITGC team has been examining Thwaites closely to better predict its potential breakdown. Their comprehensive studies have painted a stark picture of the glacier’s future. In a report released Thursday, the scientists emphasized that the outlook is “grim,” detailing the results of their six-year investigation. The data suggests that rapid ice loss is set to increase significantly this century, with Thwaites' retreat accelerating over the past 30 years. Rob Larter, a marine geophysicist from the British Antarctic Survey, noted, “Our findings indicate it is set to retreat further and faster.” The potential consequences of Thwaites’ collapse are dire. The glacier holds enough water to raise sea levels by more than two feet, but its collapse could eventually trigger an even greater rise of up to 10 feet, due to its role as a “cork” holding back the vast Antarctic ice sheet. Such a dramatic increase in sea levels would devastate coastal cities around the world, from Miami to London, as well as vulnerable regions like Bangladesh and the Pacific Islands. Thwaites has long been considered at risk, in part due to its unique geographical position. The land beneath the glacier slopes downward, allowing more ice to come into contact with relatively warm ocean water as it melts. Yet, until recently, scientists knew little about the specific mechanisms driving its retreat. The ITGC emphasized that “Antarctica remains the biggest wild card for understanding and forecasting future sea level rise.” Over the last six years, the team employed a variety of methods to gain clarity. One significant breakthrough came from Icefin, a torpedo-shaped robot sent to explore Thwaites’ grounding line—the critical point where the ice sheet rises from the seabed and begins to float. According to Kiya Riverman, a glaciologist from the University of Portland, the first footage of Icefin approaching this vulnerable area was profoundly moving. “For glaciologists, I think this had the emotional impact that perhaps the moon landing had on the rest of society,” she said. “It was a big deal. We were seeing this place for the first time.” Through Icefin's imagery, the researchers discovered that Thwaites is melting in unexpected ways. Warm ocean water is funneled through deep cracks and “staircase” formations in the ice. Other experiments using satellite and GPS data revealed that seawater is able to penetrate more than six miles beneath the glacier, exacerbating the melting process. Further analysis of marine sediment cores by Julia Wellner, a professor at the University of Houston, shed light on Thwaites’ historical retreat, suggesting that it began retreating rapidly in the 1940s, likely triggered by a strong El Niño event. “These results teach us broadly about ice behavior, adding more detail than is available by just looking at the modern ice,” Wellner explained. Despite the bleak findings, there was one piece of good news. While scientists had feared that the collapse of Thwaites’ ice shelves could expose towering cliffs of ice that would repeatedly collapse into the ocean, recent computer models suggest this scenario is less likely than previously believed. However, this does not mean the glacier is safe. The researchers project that the entire Thwaites Glacier, along with the Antarctic Ice Sheet behind it, could be lost by the 23rd century. Even if global fossil fuel emissions were drastically reduced, it may already be too late to prevent its collapse. Eric Rignot, a glaciologist at the University of California, Irvine, voiced his concerns: “While progress has been made, we still have deep uncertainty about the future. I remain very worried that this sector of Antarctica is already in a state of collapse.” Though the current phase of the ITGC project is drawing to a close, scientists acknowledge that much more research is necessary to fully understand the complexity of the Doomsday Glacier and to determine whether its retreat can be stopped. Credit: CNN 2024-09-23 -
0
Labour Leaders to Reject Free Clothing: Starmer and Rayner Announce Change
In response to growing calls from Labour MPs, Sir Keir Starmer, Angela Rayner, and Rachel Reeves have vowed to stop accepting free clothing. This decision follows mounting pressure for the Prime Minister to halt receiving gifts, particularly in light of recent criticism over Starmer's acceptance of donations. Sources from Number 10 confirmed that Starmer, along with Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner and Chancellor Rachel Reeves, will no longer take free clothing. The announcement comes just before the Labour Party's annual conference, which is set to begin in Liverpool this Sunday. The controversy stemmed from reports revealing that Sir Keir and his wife had accepted financial contributions from Labour peer Lord Alli for clothing. Additionally, Starmer had received donations to cover the cost of new glasses. These revelations led to a wave of negative headlines, sparking debates over the ethics of such donations. In recent days, Labour MPs urged Starmer to address the issue of gifts, with many concerned that these contributions were casting a shadow over his leadership. The public announcement to stop accepting free clothing reflects a shift in position, despite earlier attempts to downplay the matter. This move indicates that Number 10 had growing concerns about the potential damage the ongoing media coverage was inflicting. However, the new stance seems limited to clothing only. Other types of donations, such as those for glasses, football tickets, and concert passes, remain unaddressed for now, though these too have attracted scrutiny. The decision marks an attempt by Labour's leadership to mitigate the negative perceptions, especially in the lead-up to their conference, where the party's direction and policies are set to be discussed. By choosing to reject free clothing, Starmer and his colleagues may be hoping to steer the conversation away from personal donations and back to the larger political issues at hand. Still, it remains to be seen whether this move will quell concerns, or if further actions regarding other types of gifts will follow. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-09-23 -
0
Farage Declares "Bigots Not Welcome" as Reform UK Aims for Professionalism
Nigel Farage has made it clear that "bigots" and "extremists" have no place in Reform UK, signaling a move to "professionalise" the party following its recent electoral success. Speaking at the party's annual conference in Birmingham, Farage reflected on the party's journey since its rebranding, celebrating its first MPs elected in July but admitting that past mistakes had hindered its progress. During his speech, Farage emphasized that the party must remain vigilant against being infiltrated by "extremist groups," a challenge that new political movements often face. "We don’t want extremists, we don’t want bigots, we don’t want people who think that way, because we represent the silent, decent majority of this great country," he told the crowd. Farage’s address was delivered to a lively audience of 4,000 activists, the largest attendance the party has seen to date. To the sound of Eminem's hit song *Without Me*, Farage entered the auditorium at the National Exhibition Centre in Birmingham, waving to supporters as he made his way around the room. The party’s four other MPs, including Lee Anderson, who was perched atop an open-top double-decker bus in the conference hall, watched on as Farage took the stage. Elected as an MP in July on his eighth attempt, Farage spoke about his mission to "professionalise and democratise" the party, which he believes has already gained a crucial foothold in Parliament. He assured activists that Reform UK would not tolerate any form of extremism within its ranks. "We haven't got time, we haven't got room for a few extremists to wreck the work of a party that now has 80,000 members and rising," Farage declared, underscoring his commitment to steering the party towards long-term success. As Reform UK looks to expand its influence in British politics, Farage's vision for a more disciplined and inclusive party could be the key to securing its future as a major force on the political right. Credit: BBC 2024-09-23 -
0
Kamala Harris Blames Trump Policies for Deaths of Two Georgia Women
Vice President Kamala Harris is holding former President Donald Trump accountable for the deaths of two women in Georgia, attributing their deaths to the abortion bans that have taken root after the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Speaking at a rally in Atlanta, Harris made an emotional connection between Trump’s appointment of conservative Supreme Court justices and the state’s restrictive abortion laws. ProPublica recently reported that two women were either denied or too afraid to seek emergency care due to Georgia’s ban on abortions after six weeks of pregnancy. Harris expressed that such tragedies will only become more frequent if Trump returns to office, stating, "Now we know that at least two women — and those are only the stories we know here in the state of Georgia — died because of a Trump abortion ban." She further emphasized that these are just the cases that have come to light, adding, "The reality is, for every story we hear of the suffering under Trump abortion bans, there are so many of the stories we’re not hearing, but where suffering is happening every day in our country." The vice president's remarks are part of a broader effort to make Trump accountable for the sweeping changes in abortion laws that have affected millions of women across the country. Harris has highlighted how state bans, such as Georgia's, have impacted women’s access to healthcare, especially during emergencies. These stories have become a central element in her campaign to mobilize voters around reproductive rights. Democrats are relying on abortion as a galvanizing issue in the same way it was during the midterm elections, hoping to counter Trump’s messaging on issues like the economy and immigration. Trump has tried to balance the abortion issue by promoting a "leave-it-to-the-states" approach, stating that each state should make its own decisions regarding abortion. He has also supported exceptions to abortion bans in cases of rape, incest, and to save the mother’s life. His spokesperson, Karoline Leavitt, reiterated this stance, stating, "President Trump has always supported exceptions for rape, incest, and the life of the mother, which Georgia’s law provides. With those exceptions in place, it’s unclear why doctors did not swiftly act to protect the lives of mothers." However, Harris strongly challenged this viewpoint, particularly the idea of leaving such life-and-death decisions to state lawmakers. She highlighted how Trump’s opposition to a proposed abortion-rights ballot measure in Florida, which would protect the right to abortion until fetal viability, threatens to maintain and even expand restrictions on reproductive healthcare. Harris passionately criticized Southern lawmakers for supporting strict abortion bans while their states struggle with high maternal mortality rates. "These hypocrites want to start talking about, this is in the best interest of women and children. Well, where you been? Where you been when it comes to taking care of the women and children of America?" Harris asked, fueling her argument against the conservative lawmakers. At the rally, Harris also told the tragic stories of two Georgia women, Amber Nicole Thurman and Candi Miller, who lost their lives due to complications following failed abortion attempts. Thurman, a 28-year-old, required emergency surgery after taking abortion pills out of state, but doctors delayed treatment for 20 hours because of Georgia's abortion ban. Miller, a 41-year-old mother of three, ordered abortion pills online but was too afraid to seek emergency help and tragically died at home. "We will speak her name," Harris said of Thurman, leading the crowd in a chant of “Amber Rose Thurman.” Both deaths were preventable, according to a state maternal health review board. In her speech, Harris argued that even Trump’s stated exceptions to abortion bans fail to protect women adequately. "We’re saying that we’re going to create public policy that says that a doctor, a health care provider, will only kick in to give the care that somebody needs if they’re about to die?" Harris asked, underscoring the dangers posed by current state laws. As reproductive rights continue to be a key issue in the upcoming elections, Harris’s stance on the matter represents one of the most forceful challenges to Trump’s policies, highlighting the life-or-death stakes for women across the country. Credit: Politico 2024-09-23 -
0
Kamala Harris' Media Absence Defended: Adviser Cites Busy Schedule
In the midst of growing criticism over Vice President Kamala Harris' limited media presence, one of her top advisers, former Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms, defended the vice president's lack of interviews by highlighting her demanding schedule. Harris, 59, is on track to grant the fewest interviews of any major party's presidential nominee, having done just six sit-down interviews since President Joe Biden formally stepped down from his re-election bid on July 21. During a recent appearance on CNN’s "The Lead with Jake Tapper," Bottoms suggested that Harris’ packed agenda is the reason behind her scarce media appearances. “She’s a very busy person,” Bottoms explained. “She’s the vice president as well as a candidate.” While many have criticized Harris for her reluctance to engage with the press, Bottoms pointed to the fact that Harris continues to voice her stance on key issues in public forums, even if not in the traditional interview format. “We heard her today talk about her views on these policies,” Bottoms continued. “It may not be in the format that the media would like. It may not be that she’s sitting down doing a one-on-one interview, but we heard her today in Georgia talk about her stance on reproductive freedom.” Harris’ first formal interview since being named the Democratic Party’s candidate for president took place nearly a month after Biden announced he was stepping aside for her. On August 29, Harris sat down with CNN’s Dana Bash, with her running mate, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, by her side. Aside from this interview, Harris has made a few other appearances, including an interview with Philadelphia's ABC station, an interview with Spanish-language radio host Chiquibaby, and a panel at the National Association of Black Journalists (NABJ) gathering. Despite these appearances, the criticism persists. Harris’ media approach has drawn comparisons to that of former President Donald Trump, who, at 78, has conducted at least three times as many interviews in the same period, including a one-hour interview with Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk on X Spaces. Meanwhile, Ohio Senator JD Vance, the Republican vice-presidential nominee, has become a familiar face on Sunday morning talk shows, maintaining a regular presence on network public affairs programs. As Harris continues her campaign alongside Governor Walz, it remains to be seen whether her media strategy will evolve or whether the defense offered by Bottoms — that Harris is simply too busy — will hold in the face of further scrutiny. Credit: NYP 2024-09-23 -
0
Putin Urges Women to Work and Have a Family as Birth Rates Drop in Russia
Amid Russia's ongoing population decline, President Vladimir Putin has made a strong appeal for women to embrace both professional careers and motherhood. Speaking at the fourth annual Eurasian Women’s Forum, Putin called on Russian women to help address the country's falling birth rates by having large families while continuing to participate in the workforce. According to a Kremlin transcript, the forum, which ran from September 18 to 20 in St. Petersburg, focused on women’s professional and humanitarian contributions. “Russia is traditionally respectful of women," Putin said. "In this regard, our state policy relies on the National Strategy of Action in the Interests of Women.” He emphasized the state’s efforts to support women by creating an environment where they can be successful in their careers while also serving as "guardians of the hearth and lynchpins of large families with many children." Putin highlighted the unique qualities he believes women bring to both motherhood and the workplace, stating that women can manage the dual roles because they are "beautiful, caring, and charming," adding that women "possess a secret that men are unable to fathom." He extended his best wishes for their success, noting it would benefit "peace, creation, and progress." The appeal comes at a time when Russia's birth rate has reached its lowest level in 25 years, a trend exacerbated by rising death rates and significant emigration, particularly related to the ongoing war. Health Minister Yevgeny Shestopalov, earlier this week, made headlines by suggesting that Russians should take advantage of breaks at work to engage in procreation as a measure to combat the declining birth rate. "Life flies by too quickly," Shestopalov said, urging citizens to prioritize having children. Putin’s comments are part of a broader effort by Russian authorities to reverse the nation’s demographic decline. During the forum, which reportedly hosted over 1,500 attendees from 126 countries, other politicians also weighed in on the issue. Member of Parliament Tatyana Butskaya suggested that employers evaluate the birth rates of female staff members, while fellow lawmakers Anna Kuznetsova and Zhanna Ryabtseva advocated for younger women to start families as early as 18 to 20 years old in order to maximize their fertility. In addition to social pressure, the government has implemented financial incentives. In some regions, women are compensated for having children while still full-time students, and fertility testing programs have been expanded for women aged 18 to 40 in Moscow. This initiative follows a long history of government attempts to encourage higher birth rates, including the reintroduction of the "Mother Heroine" award last year, which offers a substantial monetary reward to families with ten or more children. The one-off payment is worth one million rubles, or approximately $16,000. Despite these efforts, the nation’s population continues to decline. Russia’s Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat) has projected that the country’s population could drop by as much as 15.4 million people by 2046. Currently, Russia has a population of 140.8 million, but the birth rate remains well below the replacement level. According to the United States Census Bureau, the average number of children per Russian woman stands at 1.5, far below the 2.1 needed to maintain a stable population. As Putin noted earlier this year, families need to have at least two children to ensure the survival of Russia’s ethnic groups, and three to promote population growth. As the Kremlin continues to push for solutions to its demographic crisis, it is clear that both economic incentives and cultural expectations are being employed to encourage Russian women to take on the dual challenge of professional work and raising large families. Credit: Newsweek 2024-09-23 -
0
Britain's Reluctance to Challenge the Powerful: A System Under Scrutiny
As more women come forward with allegations of sexual assault against the late Mohamed Fayed, questions have been raised about the Crown Prosecution Service's (CPS) handling of cases involving powerful figures. This scrutiny comes more than a decade after the CPS, then under Sir Keir Starmer, was criticized for its failure to prosecute Jimmy Savile, one of Britain’s most notorious sexual predators. Recently, the CPS has faced further backlash for delays in announcing charges against BBC presenter Huw Edwards, who was accused of accessing indecent images of children. It took over a month for the CPS to reveal it had brought charges against Edwards, and he later avoided jail with a six-month suspended sentence. Critics, including Kemi Badenoch, decried the decision as an example of “two-tier” justice, calling for an overhaul of sentencing rules. The case of Mohamed Fayed has once again highlighted what many campaigners and legal experts see as a reluctance by British authorities to challenge wealthy and well-known individuals. Fayed was questioned by police in 2008 after a 15-year-old girl accused him of sexual assault. The CPS ultimately decided not to press charges, citing “no realistic prospect of conviction.” Similar decisions were made regarding allegations against Jimmy Savile, with the full extent of his crimes only emerging after his death in 2011. Despite the high-profile nature of these cases, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s office has stated that neither the Fayed nor Savile cases crossed Starmer’s desk during his tenure at the CPS. Nonetheless, the pattern of non-prosecution has fueled concerns about the CPS’s approach toward prosecuting the rich and famous. Lawyers and activists argue that Britain’s justice system is too deferential to those in power. Richard Scorer, head of abuse law at Slater & Gordon, pointed to the UK’s strict libel laws, which he said have a “stifling effect” on victims coming forward. He contrasts this with the United States, where free speech protections make it easier to report and investigate allegations of abuse against high-profile figures. “The knowledge about what al Fayed was alleged to have done was out there in the world but the trap never sprung shut on him,” said former BBC journalist Meirion Jones. Scorer also noted the underfunding of the UK’s criminal justice system, which has exacerbated delays in bringing cases to trial. Sexual assault and rape cases now take up to six years to reach court, a situation Scorer described as “totally unacceptable.” Sir Bob Neill, chair of the Commons justice committee, added that this problem is worsened when the accused is a public figure, as victims fear they won’t be believed. Scorer’s third critique is that the UK lacks the direct political accountability found in the U.S. legal system. He highlighted the fact that in the U.S., prosecutors often pursue high-profile cases as a route to political advancement, whereas in the UK, the risk of failure can dissuade authorities from taking on such cases. “If you go after someone famous, you’ll likely tie up huge amounts of resources and there’s a huge downside if the case fails,” Scorer explained. Victims' groups argue that the reluctance to prosecute powerful figures is rooted in the UK's deeply embedded social inequality. Andrea Simon, executive director of the End Violence Against Women Coalition, stated, “We live in an unequal social system that puts men in a position of power relative to women and girls. Sexual violence is a consequence of this, with women and girls comprising the vast majority of victims.” She added that wealthy perpetrators often use legal tools, such as non-disclosure agreements, to silence victims. Britain’s justice system, still grappling with cases like those of Fayed and Savile, continues to face criticism for its perceived inability to hold the powerful to account. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-09-23 -
0
Care Homes Urged to Embrace Transgender Identities in Elderly Care
Pensioners can transition and be transgender, even if they have lived their entire life as one gender, according to new guidance provided to care homes. The advice, offered by researchers from the University of Kent, is part of a guide titled "Trans & Non-Binary Inclusion," which seeks to ensure that care homes are more inclusive towards older LGBTQ+ individuals. The guide encourages care home staff to recognize the possibility of elderly people identifying as transgender later in life. It urges workers to familiarize themselves with what it means to be trans or non-binary and to respect people's pronouns and chosen names, regardless of what legal documentation might state. However, this guidance, released in August 2024 in collaboration with the University of Surrey and the University of Hertfordshire, has sparked some criticism. A care worker from Somerset, speaking anonymously, expressed concerns about how the guidelines might clash with the beliefs of other residents, their families, or even the staff. "What about other residents or their families, or even care staff, that might have gender-critical beliefs?" the care worker questioned. “We know that those are protected under the Equality Act, so therefore nobody could be ‘made’ to use preferred pronouns. We also have to consider single-sex provisions. A female resident might be sharing some facilities with a trans-identifying male. This could compromise her right to dignity and privacy, but most of all her safety.” The guide has also been criticized for ignoring certain challenges that transgender care home residents face, particularly those with dementia. A 2019 study by the University of Ottawa revealed that transgender people with dementia might forget they had transitioned and revert to identifying with their birth gender. Helen Joyce, the director of advocacy at human rights charity Sex Matters, has voiced her opposition to the guide, stating: “This guidance for care homes is a shocking example of the way trans activism harms the most vulnerable in society. By imposing the fictions of gender identity ideology on gender-confused elderly people, it goes against the best interests of residents and staff.” She highlighted concerns about the distress experienced by dementia patients, saying, "The evidence of people with dementia being distressed by changes to their body that they no longer understand, such as breast implants, is deeply upsetting. Rather than offering practical, compassionate advice on how to provide care in these difficult situations, this guide treats vulnerable residents as props in a fantasy of gender affirmation." Despite the criticism, the University of Kent defends its work, explaining that the guide was created with input from older LGBTQ+ individuals and care providers. The university's larger research project, CIRCLE, which received funding from the National Institute for Health and Care Research, aims to address the unique challenges faced by older LGBTQ+ individuals in social care. Dr. Jolie Keemink, who contributed to the guide, emphasized that “research shows that the older LGBTQ+ population is expected to rely more heavily on social care than their cis-gender, heterosexual counterparts because they are less likely to have children and more likely to experience a lack of social support." The guide, which includes a poster to indicate a care home’s commitment to LGBTQ+ inclusion, will be available online and distributed at the Care Show, the UK's largest social care event, held in Birmingham in October. Dr. Keemink added, “There is an urgent need for improvements with regards to LGBTQ+ inclusion within care homes, and we hope that this guide can play a useful role in this.” Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-09-23 -
123
-
123
Are these people stark raving mad?
And you believe everything the MSM tells you! -
89
Americans -- did you know that Albania wants us? (Another Plan B alternative to Thailand)
Sicily, where the brain surgeons have to use jackhammers when they operate because the skulls are so thick. (A little intra-ethnic humor there). There are places in that part of the Mediterranean that haven't caught up to the 20th century yet. E.g. I met a Brit woman who went solo to Lampedusa recently and she said she constantly had women asking her "where is your husband?" With the exception of the larger cities like Athens, I would suspect in the rural regions the attitudes toward modern gender lifestyles are not what you would appreciate. And you really don't want get involved in a conversation about who killed JC. IMO your Turkey idea was better. For entertainment you might want to check out the US TV series "Law&Order: Organized Crime" a few seasons back when they took on the Albanian mob; it was the first time I appreciated Meloni's acting, and Lolita Davidovich plays an Albanian madam -- she nails it. -
123
Are these people stark raving mad?
Not at all. Just explaining a few facts that you are totally unaware of. Do some research. -
27
Is Civil Unrest Inevitable If Trump Loses?
The problem arises when the fake electors present documents claiming that they are the official, and not alternate, electors.
-
.thumb.jpg.bc523c85a8d558dbc282dca7a2e602c9.jpg)
.thumb.jpeg.435f0fb7221c5dd6500feca45095b936.jpeg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now