Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, novacova said:

The problem with “conspiracy theories” is that the term is used as a way to write off legitimate questions. Question authority? Those who the question authority are responded with the hysterics and answer with “conspiracy theory” as a ridicule to circumvent factual answers. Those who find evidence of facts are then quashed and ignored by a massive media onslaught. So, if anyone with any self respect and empirical thought will raise questions and ignore the silly modern day term “conspiracy theory”. This has all been played out before in the past when a “system” is being constructed.

During the covid debacle I asked several family members and close friends if they thought there was any chance at all that the narrative that we were being fed was not entirely correct. Nearly every single one of them called me a conspiracy theorist and said that I was always feeling this need to question things, as if that was a bad thing. 

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, spidermike007 said:

During the covid debacle I asked several family members and close friends if they thought there was any chance at all that the narrative that we were being fed was not entirely correct. Nearly every single one of them called me a conspiracy theorist and said that I was always feeling this need to question things, as if that was a bad thing. 

It is good to question things that impact our lives greatly, but also a good thing being able to push in the same directions. 

When it comes to covid, I'm not sure the specialists or the scientists exactly knew what they were facing, and took precautions for each and once best. We know how bad it could have turned out with all emergency rooms full, and those who are in charge have to calculate escalation and other coincidently happenings could occur.

 

Of course those without responsibillity knew best of course, and those with no science background also, or no back ground historical facts either to base their assumptions on. 

 

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   Why was the photo removed from X ? 


No idea, but I’m pretty sure it was an old photograph. Trump has never revealed the damage to his ear.

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Thingamabob said:

The families and friends of the person who was killed. and of those who were injured, including Trump, should be shown some respect. You should be ashamed of yourself but I understand that, for people with your condition, that is impossible. I suggest you seek help asap.


The families of the people who died, including Thomas Crooks, deserve to know the truth. And that means asking questions and following evidence. If the ear is damaged, show it. It’s not that difficult. It closes down any notion that Trump was never injured. What are they afraid of? 

  • Confused 1
  • Love It 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, AlexRich said:


No idea, but I’m pretty sure it was an old photograph. Trump has never revealed the damage to his ear.

 

   So you do have some idea ?

Was it an old photograph or not ?

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, PETERTHEEATER said:

One question to which I have found no answer is Where is the bullet which struck Trumps ear?

There were people behind him yet they were not injured,,, 

 

 

One was killed and 2 injured behind him

Posted
13 hours ago, G_Money said:


Real.

 

If in doubt ask the family of the dead firefighter or even the parents of the dead assassin.

 

surely they can pump out a replacement.

Posted
29 minutes ago, AlexRich said:

Proof of nothing.

You need to go and sit in the corner with all the other conspiracy theorists and let the rest of us use our time productively.

Posted
3 hours ago, PETERTHEEATER said:

One question to which I have found no answer is Where is the bullet which struck Trumps ear?

There were people behind him yet they were not injured,,, 

If you look at the stage area photo, the people are seated about 15Yds.

behind Trump. I think that the fbi are out with metal detectors looking.

The TV. camera angle makes it look that they are a few feet away.

Posted
1 hour ago, proton said:

 

 

One was killed and 2 injured behind him

I believe the the firefighter covering his family was stage R.

Posted
1 hour ago, AlexRich said:


I don’t believe it is a current photograph. As far as I know Trump has never revealed his “injury” publicly. But … I suspect that there is no damage to his ear. No bullet damage, or shard of glass. And I’m staying with that until I see evidence that proves otherwise. Given the seriousness of the event, I don’t think it is too much to ask? It would help Trump, unless of course it has no damage at all, because that would imply the event was staged. 

How do you know that is the real Trump at the arena? Could be an look alike. Think about that for a sec 

 

😉

 

Cant cure stupidity

Posted
15 hours ago, AlexRich said:

If this is real, I think the answer is YES. Discuss.

 

 

 

it probably was a piece of shrapnel from a telepromter shattered by the bullets or similar object.

 

not really an important detail. Trump was still shot at. Whether a bullet grazed his ear or a shrapnel doesn't matter to me.

 

the person who saved Trump was probably the police guy who disturbed the shooter on the roof.

Posted
12 minutes ago, tgw said:

 

it probably was a piece of shrapnel from a telepromter shattered by the bullets or similar object.

 

not really an important detail. Trump was still shot at. Whether a bullet grazed his ear or a shrapnel doesn't matter to me.

 

the person who saved Trump was probably the police guy who disturbed the shooter on the roof.

I not confident he saved Donald, since Donal turned his head to look at the teleprompter exaclty when the bullit hit his ear. The Police man should had taken action imidiately when see him on the roof. Easy to say, but what the hell was the police and SS doing? How could it be so easy for a 20 year old kid getting in the position to make several shots, with an rifle? 

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, AlexRich said:


The problem with conspiracy theories is that some of them turn out to be true. Lee Harvey Oswald as the “lone gunman” anyone? How about the Gulf of Tonkin attack, that never happened? 
 

The whacky ones are of course easy to debunk. Like the flat earth crew. 
 

But the “Trump assassination”. Sorry, not going along with that until I see the actual damage to his ear. One day, we will. The ear will have no visible signs of injury, and will be declared fully healed. And many of you will buy into that, without question.
 

If I were Trump, and my ear had been damaged by an assassins bullet or some shard of glass I would show it publicly … and close down any notion that the event was staged. But he doesn’t do that? And no one asks why? 
 

Oh, but someone died, that’s proof enough? You think anyone that would pull a stunt like this would care about that? 
 

Until I see proof, I’m not buying this BS.

and, if a high velocity bullet passed close enough to his ear to remove a chunk of it, he should at least have burst eardrum from the shockwave.

  • Sad 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, Hummin said:

I not confident he saved Donald, since Donal turned his head to look at the teleprompter exaclty when the bullit hit his ear. The Police man should had taken action imidiately when see him on the roof. Easy to say, but what the hell was the police and SS doing? How could it be so easy for a 20 year old kid getting in the position to make several shots, with an rifle? 

 

the guy (apparently) fired three shots, of which only one just at the moment Trump turned his head.

he was disturbed in his aim and missed.

Posted
2 hours ago, Hummin said:

It is good to question things that impact our lives greatly, but also a good thing being able to push in the same directions. 

When it comes to covid, I'm not sure the specialists or the scientists exactly knew what they were facing, and took precautions for each and once best. We know how bad it could have turned out with all emergency rooms full, and those who are in charge have to calculate escalation and other coincidently happenings could occur.

 

Of course those without responsibillity knew best of course, and those with no science background also, or no back ground historical facts either to base their assumptions on. 

 

 

Though I agree with you marginally, I do believe the FDA, the CDC, and the WHO were deeply influenced by Big Pharma, and there were alot of other factors at okay, as well as some less than sincere agendas. 

Posted
1 minute ago, spidermike007 said:

Though I agree with you marginally, I do believe the FDA, the CDC, and the WHO were deeply influenced by Big Pharma, and there were alot of other factors at okay, as well as some less than sincere agendas. 

Hard to deny big pharma influence of course, so no doubt they knew which buttons to push. Still in January, the first thing I did was to call a friend of mine who is specialiced in virus pandemics and worked around the world, what is coming now. She expained for me how it would turn out, and made it easier for me to take my precautions and stay in Thailand the whole pandemic. 

 

The interesting part is, what will happen the next pandemic, will people listening to recomandations and rules? or will the majority manage to pull in same direction for everyones best? 

Posted
5 hours ago, AlexRich said:

Until I see proof, I’m not buying this BS.

 

was watching a guy breakdown the sounds from videos yesterday. you can hear all the gun shots that happened during the rally. some very interesting points brought up about how many different kinds of shots were fired. 

 

from what he said there was 3 different guns fired during the rally. 

  • Confused 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...