Did Donald J Trump fool the world?

[AlexRich]

2 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

  Where is his ear ?

The photo need s a red arrow to point his ear out 

The point about this photograph is that it was taken after the fake assassination attempt. There is no damage whatsoever to Trump’s ear. 
 

Because Trump believes that people will believe anything … and sadly he is right. A liar, con man, fraudster, criminal and rapist … hiding in plain sight. 

[Hummin]

4 minutes ago, AlexRich said:

The point about this photograph is that it was taken after the fake assassination attempt. There is no damage whatsoever to Trump’s ear. 
 

Because Trump believes that people will believe anything … and sadly he is right. A liar, con man, fraudster, criminal and rapist … hiding in plain sight. 

You making a comedy here, 

 

He was attempted assinated by 8 shots. One shot streifed his ear, he got some blood, and by luck (unfortunate some would say) he turned his head just at the right moment, and the shooter missed his target. 

 

Thats the facts, and guess what, the type Trumph is, he is now god sent to his people

[Nick Carter icp]

52 minutes ago, AlexRich said:

The point about this photograph is that it was taken after the fake assassination attempt. There is no damage whatsoever to Trump’s ear. 
 

Because Trump believes that people will believe anything … and sadly he is right. A liar, con man, fraudster, criminal and rapist … hiding in plain sight. 

 

   The shooting was 14 days ago , that is enough time for the wound to heal 

[AlexRich]

19 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   The shooting was 14 days ago , that is enough time for the wound to heal 

 

The truth, that you don’t want to face up to, is that Trump wasn’t shot at. Trump wasn’t hit by anything. 
 

I’m now seeing comments that the “shooter” Thomas Crooks never shot at anyone, he was set up as the patsy. 

 

 

[Nick Carter icp]

1 hour ago, AlexRich said:

 

The truth, that you don’t want to face up to, is that Trump wasn’t shot at. Trump wasn’t hit by anything. 
 

I’m now seeing comments that the “shooter” Thomas Crooks never shot at anyone, he was set up as the patsy. 

 

 

 

 

   Why didn't Trump just wear a bandage on his ear to hide the fact that there isnt a scar on his ear ?

[AlexRich]

4 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

 

   Why didn't Trump just wear a bandage on his ear to hide the fact that there isnt a scar on his ear ?

He knows that people like you will come out and explain it all away.

 

But if anyone reads the letter about his “injuries” written by his former WH doctor, they have to ask the question … how can you sustain that damage and two weeks later not have any visible damage to your ear? 
 

Trump supporters never will, because truth is whatever you want it to be in Trump world. 

[Nick Carter icp]

2 minutes ago, AlexRich said:

He knows that people like you will come out and explain it all away.

 

But if anyone reads the letter about his “injuries” written by his former WH doctor, they have to ask the question … how can you sustain that damage and two weeks later not have any visible damage to your ear? 
 

Trump supporters never will, because truth is whatever you want it to be in Trump world. 

 

   Two weeks is enough time for a wound to heal 

[thaibeachlovers]

On 7/27/2024 at 8:45 PM, AlexRich said:

No. No one who says Trump faked his assassination is saying that. What they are saying is that those people died to make a fake assassination look real. Do you think Trump cares about them? 

and you apparently think Trump can get the secret service and a great many other people to agree to fake it, without anyone raising an alarm about it. If that were the case it'd be in huge capitals on the front page of every newspaper in every country on the planet. It's not so your supposition is

[thaibeachlovers]

On 7/27/2024 at 8:48 PM, AlexRich said:

The point about this photograph is that it was taken after the fake assassination attempt. There is no damage whatsoever to Trump’s ear. 
 

Because Trump believes that people will believe anything … and sadly he is right. A liar, con man, fraudster, criminal and rapist … hiding in plain sight. 

and apparently you think Trump was able to recruit a patsy, a real assassin, the secret service, and loads more people including the people that did first aid on his ear, the staff in hospital and his doctor, the person that put the fake blood on his ear and face, and do so long enough ago to be prepared for that rally, all without anyone spilling the beans.

 

Did you mention people that will believe anything?

[Danderman123]

Conspiracy theory.

 

Trump was nicked by a bullet.

 

The shooter was a nut job.

 

The Secret Service screwed up.

[AlexRich]

10 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

and apparently you think Trump was able to recruit a patsy, a real assassin, the secret service, and loads more people including the people that did first aid on his ear, the staff in hospital and his doctor, the person that put the fake blood on his ear and face, and do so long enough ago to be prepared for that rally, all without anyone spilling the beans.

 

Did you mention people that will believe anything?

Who at the hospital actually treated him? Do you know their names? The only doctor to write a letter on his behalf is the Candyman, Ronny Jackson … a discredited practitioner. And he wasn’t there? 
 

As for recruiting a Patsy. That’s been going on forever … Lee Harvey Oswald, Sirhan Sirhan … getting a 20 year old involved to “help” the Police with crowd surveillance, wouldn’t be that difficult. The building he was on housed Police snipers, how did he get there carrying ladders, a scope and an A15 assault rifle? And why wasn’t he tackled before shooting started, as we have plenty of evidence from people in the crowd? 
 

You simply don’t want to believe what’s right in front of you. Donald Trump could meet you and explain how it all went down, and you’d convince yourself he’s been drugged by the “Deep State”. 

[AlexRich]

10 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

and you apparently think Trump can get the secret service and a great many other people to agree to fake it, without anyone raising an alarm about it. If that were the case it'd be in huge capitals on the front page of every newspaper in every country on the planet. It's not so your supposition is

Why would Mike Pence refuse to get into the Secret Service car on Jan 6th? Because he didn’t believe that he’d get out alive. He didn’t trust them because he knew they were all under Trump’s command. 
 

Trump came out the other day to defend the lady Secret Service agent, who was crouched down, grabbing his waist, whilst he was doing his Zoolander impression … posing for a photo opportunity whilst supposedly the victim of an assassination attempt. 
 

The reason he backs her up is because she did what she was told to do, take part in a performance. 

[AlexRich]

Even AI agrees with me.

 

 

[AlexRich]

On 7/27/2024 at 1:56 AM, thaibeachlovers said:

So the guy didn't actually die from a bullet fired at Trump? Is that what you are saying? He was just an actor pretending to die?

 

He was a Patsy.

[StandardIssue]

No, just a about 45% of the American people around 8 years back. I think the majority of the rest of the world probably think  the intelligence of the average American has slowly crept downward since the Nixon administration.

[cdemundo]

On 7/28/2024 at 12:10 PM, AlexRich said:

 

 

Beyond the ear, in the attached photo he looks old and tired.

He is glitching during his speeches, losing his train of thought, garbling words, mispronouncing.

Hope that people notice that he is in cognitive decline.

Edited August 6 by cdemundo

[thaibeachlovers]

On 7/29/2024 at 10:55 PM, AlexRich said:

Who at the hospital actually treated him? Do you know their names? The only doctor to write a letter on his behalf is the Candyman, Ronny Jackson … a discredited practitioner. And he wasn’t there? 
 

As for recruiting a Patsy. That’s been going on forever … Lee Harvey Oswald, Sirhan Sirhan … getting a 20 year old involved to “help” the Police with crowd surveillance, wouldn’t be that difficult. The building he was on housed Police snipers, how did he get there carrying ladders, a scope and an A15 assault rifle? And why wasn’t he tackled before shooting started, as we have plenty of evidence from people in the crowd? 
 

You simply don’t want to believe what’s right in front of you. Donald Trump could meet you and explain how it all went down, and you’d convince yourself he’s been drugged by the “Deep State”. 

You paint a potentially viable situation, except for one thing, Trump was up against Biden then, so probably going to win. In any case, there is no reason to believe that being almost assassinated was going to help his prospects of winning. The Dems were giving him all the publicity he needed with their politically motivated court cases, for free.

 

The sheer incompetence of the secret service is probably confirmation that it was a real attempt, as if it were the real thing they'd likely have done a better job.

[thaibeachlovers]

20 hours ago, AlexRich said:

 

He was a Patsy.

As the shooter had to have the bullet pass close to Trump to be authentic without killing him, there is no way they used an AR 15, which you would know if you knew about sniper rifles is not particularly accurate. Even if you are correct, there would have been a very good chance of the shooter killing Trump by mistake.

Soooo, to be a viable theory, either the shooter used a proper sniper rifle chambered for an AR 15 round, and had to be incredibly good to reload a bolt action rifle in the time between shots and aim properly, or there were multiple shooters. Then they left the AR 15, which would not make sense. Bolt action hunting rifles are not uncommon.

 

Of course, they may have had someone in the room with a weapon used close up, without anyone noticing, or many other ever more ludicrous explanations.

 

Just no reason to mount such an attempt then, and no other explanation makes sense to me than a stupid guy thinking an AR 15 was accurate enough to use and an incompetent secret service detail.

[nauseus]

On 7/27/2024 at 3:48 PM, AlexRich said:

The point about this photograph is that it was taken after the fake assassination attempt. There is no damage whatsoever to Trump’s ear. 
 

Because Trump believes that people will believe anything … and sadly he is right. A liar, con man, fraudster, criminal and rapist … hiding in plain sight. 

 

A dressing is normal for a few days to keep wounds clean and prevent infection.

 

Trump can afford the best medical care - a minor (plastic) surgical procedure would have fixed the tiny amunt of flesh damage quickly - and left no scarring. You are just ch1t stirring.  

Edited August 7 by nauseus

[thaibeachlovers]

On 7/27/2024 at 8:48 PM, AlexRich said:

The point about this photograph is that it was taken after the fake assassination attempt. There is no damage whatsoever to Trump’s ear. 
 

Because Trump believes that people will believe anything … and sadly he is right. A liar, con man, fraudster, criminal and rapist … hiding in plain sight. 

Rubbish. There was hardly any blood, so it may have been a nick, easily closed and a small suture, which you would not see on a photo.

 

 

[cdemundo]

6 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

As the shooter had to have the bullet pass close to Trump to be authentic without killing him, there is no way they used an AR 15, which you would know if you knew about sniper rifles is not particularly accurate. Even if you are correct, there would have been a very good chance of the shooter killing Trump by mistake.

Soooo, to be a viable theory, either the shooter used a proper sniper rifle chambered for an AR 15 round, and had to be incredibly good to reload a bolt action rifle in the time between shots and aim properly, or there were multiple shooters. Then they left the AR 15, which would not make sense. Bolt action hunting rifles are not uncommon.

 

Of course, they may have had someone in the room with a weapon used close up, without anyone noticing, or many other ever more ludicrous explanations.

 

Just no reason to mount such an attempt then, and no other explanation makes sense to me than a stupid guy thinking an AR 15 was accurate enough to use and an incompetent secret service detail.

Thank you for your "insights".

[thaibeachlovers]

1 minute ago, nauseus said:

 

A dressing is normal for a few days to keep wounds clean and prevent infection.

 

Trump can afford the best medical care - a minor (plastic) surgical procedure would have fixed the tiny amunt of flesh damage quickly - and left no scarring. You are just ch1t stirring.  

That's wrong. Due to the magic of modern medicine if the wound is closed properly a spray dressing will keep the wound clean. No need for any "dressing". Invisible on a photo.

 

I suspect the large dressing Trump had in the days after was to gain sympathy. I had a piece of cancer on my ear removed, with part of my ear, and just sprayed the wound after the initial dressing was removed the next day. That kept it clean and I could shower with it.

[nauseus]

4 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

That's wrong. Due to the magic of modern medicine if the wound is closed properly a spray dressing will keep the wound clean. No need for any "dressing". Invisible on a photo.

 

I suspect the large dressing Trump had in the days after was to gain sympathy. I had a piece of cancer on my ear removed, with part of my ear, and just sprayed the wound after the initial dressing was removed the next day. That kept it clean and I could shower with it.

......after the initial dressing was removed the next day.

[thaibeachlovers]

17 minutes ago, nauseus said:

......after the initial dressing was removed the next day.

Perhaps I worded it wrongly. Yes, after the dressing put on while the wound was still oozing is removed and the wound cleaned by a nurse, a spray dressing can be applied. Advantages are that no further dressing changes are required and one can shower with it.

[nauseus]

13 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Perhaps I worded it wrongly. Yes, after the dressing put on while the wound was still oozing is removed and the wound cleaned by a nurse, a spray dressing can be applied. Advantages are that no further dressing changes are required and one can shower with it.

 

A big difference is that your wound was planned created under controlled conditions.

 

Hope it's all clear, by the way.