Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Here are some of you and the trusty kamala clueless supporters, ... so embarrassing but you don't even see it

 

P.S, Biden is sti POTUS, but you all forgot about you hero...in the blink of an eye... no loyalitly, just power hungry cultists

 

 

  • Confused 2
Posted
1 minute ago, luckymitchell said:

Here are some of you and the trusty kamala clueless supporters, ... so embarrassing but you don't even see it

 

P.S, Biden is sti POTUS, but you all forgot about you hero...in the blink of an eye... no loyalitly, just power hungry cultists

 

 

Did you put that extra powder in your kool aide today , Sky News , your joking Skippy , Lefties lol

Posted

She will unburden us by what has been.

 

BTW, why is a Kamala-related story being posted here? Seems a bit obsessive and fetishistic to me.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Irish star said:

Did you put that extra powder in your kool aide today , Sky News , your joking Skippy , Lefties lol

Mate, you have bombared the AN threads nonstop for the last 4 hours  like youve been on the pipe, don't try and use the same jokes back as a reply.

The fact that you instantly replied show you didn't take time to even watch the first minute. well, perhaps you and a few here should, because that's how we see you when you rant here

 

  • Confused 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Irish star said:

We can talk Stock market, lowest unemployment Ever , Abortion Rights , overthrowing Roe-Wade , we can discuss Republicans in Jail and percentages, we can discuss Putin Assets , Trump , MTG most of the republican roster , We can discuss Christofascist in the Republican Party , 2025  , Kim who he owes 20 million dollars , we can discuss Logan Act , but Biden Harris passed so many Bills ,  how much of his term did he play Golf , you can google Biden Accomplishments it’s easy versus Trump debacle presidency   

So you can't discuss anything, you mention 3 topics that could be discussed then went into a rant of nonsense, christofascist , Kim owe 20 mil, a total load of abaolute nonsense

  • Agree 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Irish star said:

We can talk Stock market, lowest unemployment Ever , Abortion Rights , overthrowing Roe-Wade , we can discuss Republicans in Jail and percentages, we can discuss Putin Assets , Trump , MTG most of the republican roster , We can discuss Christofascist in the Republican Party , 2025  , Kim who he owes 20 million dollars , we can discuss Logan Act , but Biden Harris passed so many Bills ,  how much of his term did he play Golf , you can google Biden Accomplishments it’s easy versus Trump debacle presidency   

 

Why don't you talk about how the DNC had an Israeli couple talk about how their son was held hostage, but oddly no Palestinian American talking about how Israel killed 15000 children?  What did Biden and Harris do to bring peace in the Middle East? Apart from siding with Israel as usual? How will that play with young voters in American universities, do you think? 

 

Should a Palestinian American have had a speaking spot at the DNC?

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
47 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

Why don't you talk about how the DNC had an Israeli couple talk about how their son was held hostage, but oddly no Palestinian American talking about how Israel killed 15000 children?  What did Biden and Harris do to bring peace in the Middle East? Apart from siding with Israel as usual? How will that play with young voters in American universities, do you think? 

 

Should a Palestinian American have had a speaking spot at the DNC?

 

I could give a Rats Ass   Trump wants them Deported lol

Posted
58 minutes ago, luckymitchell said:

So you can't discuss anything, you mention 3 topics that could be discussed then went into a rant of nonsense, christofascist , Kim owe 20 mil, a total load of abaolute nonsense

It’s truth and facts but k don’t see you fact checking me lol

Posted (edited)

Well my Friends and  Magats , The party is Over , Trump Surrendered to Obama , yes he adores the Obama ‘s Michelle also , Weep he really has a lot of respect for The Obama’s n , Enjoy , I told you he’s a Democrat Plant , You Trump Stooges 

IMG_3060.png

Edited by Irish star
Posted
1 minute ago, Irish star said:

Well my Friends and  Magats , The party is Over , Trump Surrendered to Obama , yes he adores the Obama ‘s Michelle also , Weep he really has a lot of respect for The Obama’s n , Enjoy , I told you he’s a Democrat Plant , You Trump Stooges 

IMG_3060.png

He’s going to Prison, he’s shopping Pardons 555555 Magats just don’t get it 

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Irish star said:

He’s going to Prison, he’s shopping Pardons 555555 Magats just don’t get it 

 

How he is shopping pardons?

Oh you mean, in the unlikely case Kamala wins the election, it is actually Obama who is governing, same as it was with the dement incumbent?

 

 

Edited by CallumWK
  • Confused 1
Posted
36 minutes ago, Irish star said:

I could give a Rats Ass   Trump wants them Deported lol

 

So the youth and future of America studying at Columbia, Yale et al have the choice of a president who openly and rabidly supports Israel or a one who pretends to care about Palestinians but doesn't even bother to give a speaking slot to a Palestinian American.

 

Got ya.

  • Sad 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Irish star said:

It’s truth and facts but k don’t see you fact checking me lol

I barely have enough interest in reading your nonsense, let alone wasting time fact checking it.

Posted
10 hours ago, Irish star said:

IMG_3059.thumb.png.70b5cb23a8e5670cbd002471d328bdf3.png

PA goes to trump. Kamala is against fracking. That states economy relies on fracking

  • Haha 2
Posted
12 hours ago, Cameroni said:

 

First of all there is a  risk that a perfectly random sample of a given size may not reflect the characteristics of the population as a whole (known as “sampling error”). In fact, the group of people who participate in any given survey are virtually never an idealised random sub-set of the population that will actually turn out to vote. Instead, they can differ from the eventual mix in important ways, which collectively are known as “non-sampling error”.

 

Then polls are subject to the vagaries of voter turnout. Polls conducted among all adults will include the views of people who are ineligible or not registered to vote. Those limited to registered voters treat all respondents in this group as if they had an equal probability of showing up to vote, which they surely do not. And those that seek to filter out respondents unlikely to vote, or that grant more weight to the views of people who are more likely to show up, can get such calculations wrong. Although no two surveys are identical, ones that use a similar approach to predicting turnout are more likely to wind up with errors of a similar size and direction than are ones that handle it differently. In statistical terms, each of these different methods of turnout projection can produce a “bias”, which is likely to contaminate the results of all the pollsters that use it in a similar way.

 

The group of people pollsters can reach by using live telephone interviewers may have different voting intentions than those they can reach by automated phone calls, or via the internet. Individual pollsters may make methodological choices, such as weighting schemes, that consistently lead to more or less favourable results for a particular political party.

 

Ahead of time, it is impossible to know the direction or size of the bias that each of these characteristics may introduce.

 

Voters who have a soft but consistent preference for one of the two major parties often say they are undecided or planning to vote for a third party. This makes polls in the first half of the year a surprisingly weak predictor of final results. For example, in June 1988, George H.W. Bush trailed Michael Dukakis by 12 percentage points in polling averages (he went on to win by eight). Exactly four years later, Mr Bush led Bill Clinton by ten percentage points, and wound up losing by seven.

 

In more recent years, polling errors have been a bit smaller—but they can still be substantial. In 2000 Mr Bush’s son George W. saw his ten-point lead over Al Gore in the popular vote turn into a deficit during the final three months of the campaign. It took the Electoral College and a disputed 537-vote victory in Florida to save his presidential bid. And notoriously, Hillary Clinton led Donald Trump by around eight points in June, August and even October of 2016, before she barely squeaked out a two-point edge in the popular vote.

 

https://www.economist.com/interactive/us-2024-election/prediction-model/president/how-this-works

 

Ultimately, some people who claim to be undecided are not, they favour one or the other party. Some who claim they will vote for one or the other, do not, or are not eligible to vote.

 

The key point is however that undecided voters in the swing states will determine the election, which is not about who gets the most votes, Clinton got the most votes and lost, because of the way the US electoral system works.

 

Undecided voters do change over time, and polls cannot accurately predict how they will vote. Reality, ultimately, is more complex than science and mathematics will be able to model. We saw this with corona, and we saw it with past polling efforts.

Understood. Could you review the positioning of this site claims about their accuracy. And will the polling have different outlooks when comparing mid-terms compared to Presidential?racetothewh

Posted
11 hours ago, Irish star said:

Mitch  what’s  so Lucky about ya , Brain Worms , Mentally Challenged behavior, , KDS , Cringe Fringe, Cmon tell us Why Mitch is so Lucky, I need to hear this , since your arguments are turning Juvenile at best 

My money s on his brain on worms

Posted
10 hours ago, luckymitchell said:

Mate, you have bombared the AN threads nonstop for the last 4 hours  like youve been on the pipe, don't try and use the same jokes back as a reply.

The fact that you instantly replied show you didn't take time to even watch the first minute. well, perhaps you and a few here should, because that's how we see you when you rant here

 

A rising star that you are just now realizing, perhaps? Much better sane results compared to the absolute worst, susan!!!

Posted
10 hours ago, Cameroni said:

 

Why don't you talk about how the DNC had an Israeli couple talk about how their son was held hostage, but oddly no Palestinian American talking about how Israel killed 15000 children?  What did Biden and Harris do to bring peace in the Middle East? Apart from siding with Israel as usual? How will that play with young voters in American universities, do you think? 

 

 

Please provide the argument why young voters concerned about Palestine should vote for Trump.

 

Feel free to include statements from the RNC about Palestine.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 minute ago, luckymitchell said:

Susan?

Yes, the number one poster of all of the political posters. Her reputaio for one line insults and ragging

She has a few historical names and the most current one is easily recognizable by the hidious  number of nonsencical posts

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...