Jump to content

Former School Director Sentenced to 250 Years for Corruption Scandal


webfact

Recommended Posts

Stole from the kids for self gain. 250 yrs what's the point,people like him happy to get fed. Should make him serve the kids for 250 years, strip them of all their possessions then make them work serving the kids & community. Some blame should be on his bosses as well 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Prisons and schools make money by cutting down on the meat provided to prisoners and students and keeping the price difference. Not sure what is the purpose of consecutive sentences. If the court wanted him dead they could just as well have given him a life sentence without parole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

Well this is a good start, though it seems like a bit of an overreach. Now, if only they would get on to investigating, arresting, and convicting top active (not former) officials in the army, the administration, the police, customs, and immigration we could then say that Thailand is moving forward, and that the nation resembles an open and progressive democracy. 

How many at the top would be left?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, webfact said:

zero-tolerance stance on corruption within educational institutions,

They should widen this to include many other aspects e.g. politicians.....etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, webfact said:

The court found Mr. Suthep guilty and imposed the maximum penalty of five years per count, with a total of 50 counts. This brought the cumulative sentence to 250 years. However, upon Mr. Suthep's confession, the sentence was reduced to 150 years.

If anyone wants to explain how that reduction will make a difference to him, I am all ears

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This article covers it all: 

 

- Common sense - or rather the complete absence of it by the court; let's face it, a jail sentence of two hundred and fifty years, seriously? Graciously reduced to only 150 years - what were these judges and courts thinking in the first place? 

 

- Reality - a budget of 20 Baht per meal per child is not enough to live and too much to die. What do you want to serve for 20 Baht. Nobody expects a five course Oriental meal but being a retired restaurateur I can tell you - mission impossible. The kids were shortchanged with the 20 Baht already. 

 

- Corruption; stealing 6 Baht and leaving 14 Baht - congratulations

As long as schools are semi-divine, teachers are semi-divine and everything attached to a school is semi-divine = that's the outcome. Congratulations; well done! 

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some people are slow learners. All he has to do is buy a neck brace and a sling and then find a doctor to say his blood oxygen is low. The corrections mob will move him to a suite in the rtpolice hospital. Top food, telephone, visitors confidentiality of his medical state to silence the doubters. With a rethink on charges, pardons and parole he should be home for Christmas. 250 years. Nonsense more like 250 days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/13/2024 at 1:00 AM, webfact said:

n a landmark ruling, the Criminal Court for Corruption and Misconduct Cases Region 6 has sentenced Mr. Suthep Sukthong, the former director of Ban Phon Thong School, to 250 years in prison.

 

This sounds like a long time, many lifes. ?


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/13/2024 at 10:20 AM, brianthainess said:
On 8/13/2024 at 8:00 AM, webfact said:

the other accused in the case, passed away before the conclusion of the trial, resulting in the dismissal of charges against him.

They should have still tried him, now his family get to keep his ill gotten gains and keep face......................:1zgarz5:

Which "ill-gotten gains"?  Charges were dismissed therefore he was never found guilty and deceased people cannot be prosecuted so the case would have been thrown out.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/13/2024 at 12:43 PM, Purdey said:

If the court wanted him dead they could just as well have given him a life sentence without parole.

No, they could not, the charges had a maximum penalty of five years, life without parole was never going to be on the table.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/13/2024 at 5:08 PM, Sydebolle said:

- Common sense - or rather the complete absence of it by the court; let's face it, a jail sentence of two hundred and fifty years, seriously?

Common sense is not being displayed by you, either, he got five years for each offence but he had fifty charges.  It works that way in your country also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Which "ill-gotten gains"?  Charges were dismissed therefore he was never found guilty and deceased people cannot be prosecuted so the case would have been thrown out.

The charges were only dismissed 'coz he was dead, if you read my post, anybody with an oz. of brain could work out that if he had not died, he too would have gone to trial and been found guilty, as I said he should have still be tried in absenteeism. Never mind loopy loo or big nock whatever troll name you use now.   :post-4641-1156694572:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...