Jump to content

On Poor People & Rushing


Recommended Posts

I am interested in why less affluent people tend to rush more. Wealthy people tend to take their time and are very patient. Have you found this to be the case in your dealings? Is it because poor people have less, so by deduction think rushing will bring a desired result more quickly? Or, because they are anxious to get results right away because nothing is saved up for emergencies?

 

Counter-intuitively I have found that rushing actually gets things done less well and quickly then having patience. One of the reasons for this may be that things are overlooked and mistakes made due to lack of thought and due consideration before acting.

 

Thoughts?

Edited by JimTripper
  • Confused 6
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, JimTripper said:

I am interested in why less affluent people tend to rush more.

haven't seen that at all - maybe the opposite. In the village, the poor people have not much to do so they may sit for hours chatting at the local 30 baht soup place. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, scubascuba3 said:

I've not noticed that, slow thinkers, move slowly, slow golfers are annoying as are slow walkers

 

 

Slow golfers should be shot (admin...that's a joke). A sniper on the second or third hole would be ideal.

 

Would they be a movable object....free drop?

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you are confusing affluent with intelligent people.  Intelligent people seem to not looked rushed nor stumble through conversations.  Not all but most.  Not sure but think I might be somewhere in the functionally stupid realm.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The link below explains it a little, I think.  I remember hearing something somewhere about the concept of poor people never having anything so they don't really think about things in a long-term way.  I guess because they aren't used to getting anything good through waiting (or at all) because they're deprived, so they don't do delayed gratification well.  I think maybe it was that they were so used to not having anything, the idea that they might have something in the future, through waiting, was kind of a foreign concept.  It was more to do with money, but I guess time could be thought of in the same way.  It's all about waiting.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/sep/21/linda-tirado-poverty-hand-to-mouth-extract

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BangkokReady said:

The link below explains it a little, I think.  I remember hearing something somewhere about the concept of poor people never having anything so they don't really think about things in a long-term way.  I guess because they aren't used to getting anything good through waiting (or at all) because they're deprived, so they don't do delayed gratification well.  I think maybe it was that they were so used to not having anything, the idea that they might have something in the future, through waiting, was kind of a foreign concept.  It was more to do with money, but I guess time could be thought of in the same way.  It's all about waiting.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/sep/21/linda-tirado-poverty-hand-to-mouth-extract

 

 

= subsistence economy, as promoted by the Chakri dynasty for decades.,.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They lack intelligence so they can only think in the immediate moment.  People that are more intelligent can plan 10 steps ahead if not years into future.

 

Dumbass:  Do the rushing now.  Do it good.

 

Intelligent person:  I finished all my work last week.  I will grab a coffee on the way.

Edited by Chris Daley
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Chris Daley said:

They lack intelligence so they can only think in the immediate moment.  People that are more intelligent can plan 10 steps ahead if not years into future.

 

Dumbass:  Do the rushing now.  Do it good.

 

Intelligent person:  I finished all my work last week.  I will grab a coffee on the way.

Also, quickly snatching at things because they have been trained in the past to see it being taken away. Or, eating very quickly because the food might not be there tomorrow. Grabbing and hoarding groceries because someone else may get them.

 

Aggressive Walmart shoppers with huge carts full or groceries when the food stamps arrive once a month (common in the USA to buy everything the first few days and go on a binge, then run out before the end of the month).

 

People with more have not had that experience of lack so they don't see it disappearing.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ModdaPunk said:

You obviously don't live in Thailand 😄

I haved lived here over 10 years. This is where I developed my theory about it, along with other Asian countries including Vietnam.

 

Are you not seeing rushing & impatience where you are?

 

Don't mistake not getting things done and laziness for patience. They are very different. Someone can move slowly, but still have a rushed, cluttered & inpatient mind.

Edited by JimTripper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/14/2024 at 7:24 PM, Will B Good said:

 

 

Slow golfers should be shot (admin...that's a joke). A sniper on the second or third hole would be ideal.

 

Would they be a movable object....free drop?

If you played behind a group of 6-8 Thais, Japanese, or Koreans here, you'd need a machine gun.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, JimTripper said:

Don't mistake not getting things done and laziness for patience. They are very different. Someone can move slowly, but still have a rushed, cluttered & inpatient mind.

 

I think I get it now.

I would agree to a certain extent.

It's probably a lack of education.

People don't really know how to organize things properly here.

They don't really know how to improvised either.

So yeah...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/19/2024 at 10:11 PM, ModdaPunk said:

I think I get it now.

I would agree to a certain extent.

It's probably a lack of education.

People don't really know how to organize things properly here.

They don't really know how to improvised either.

So yeah...

Another part of it is fluid interpersonal boundries. Someone else's problem becomes their problem relatively easily and vise versa. I see this all over, most obviously with money issues. It's like problems are never truly owned, but deflected off onto other people and situations.

 

It's not strictly an Asian thing. Happens all over. It's extremely common in crowded and stressful environments (or situations where people are broke with financial difficulties).

 

Can be seen strongly in prison settings. People can't "own" their situation and difficulties, so they find the nearest target. Strangely, the perfect target always seems to appear and make themselves available at just the right time.

 

Perhaps starts with just a telling of their problems then gradually a target strangely "absorbs" someone else's problem, thereby granting the projector a degree of relief.

 

This results in a confused and impatient mind because the target is trying to deal with irritants they are not able to screen out for some reason. It also suggest rushing because there is "too much on their plate" (they may be trying to solve someone else's problems, not just their own).

 

Group therapy regarding boundries can restore a calm and collected mindset as the individual learns to set boundries regarding other people problems and the absorbtion of negative interpersonal energy.

Edited by JimTripper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JimTripper said:

Another part of it is fluid interpersonal boundries. Someone else's problem becomes their problem relatively easily and vise versa. I see this all over, most obviously with money issues. It's like problems are never truly owned, but deflected off onto other people and situations.

 

It's not strictly an Asian thing. Happens all over. It's extremely common in crowded and stressful environments (or situations where people are broke with financial difficulties).

 

Can be seen strongly in prison settings. People can't "own" their situation and difficulties, so they find the nearest target. Strangely, the perfect target always seems to appear and make themselves available at just the right time.

 

Perhaps starts with just a telling of their problems then gradually a target strangely "absorbs" someone else's problem, thereby granting the projector a degree of relief.

 

This results in a confused and impatient mind because the target is trying to deal with irritants they are not able to screen out for some reason. It also suggest rushing because there is "too much on their plate" (they may be trying to solve someone else's problems, not just their own).

 

Group therapy regarding boundries can restore a calm and collected mindset as the individual learns to set boundries regarding other people problems and the absorbtion of negative interpersonal energy.

 

What you call "fluid interpersonal boundries" seems to be a component of the broader concept of empathy. We are all like that, at least to a degree. I would say it's part of being a social animal.

 

I don't know about prisons but in Thailand "fluid interpersonal boundries" seems to be nurtured by the culture. Thai society - at least in its traditional form - emphasizes the importance of collectivism and nationalism. The "what happens to one of us happens to all of us" mentality probably emerges from the kind of education people get here. Would be interesting to try and find out if young people are as fluid as their elders.

 

Now for the link between the concept of "fluid interpersonal boundries" and being confused and impatient, I don't know what to say. To be honest this hypothesis would require some serious investigation and testing. My guess would be that it's probably more complicated than that with multiple factors at play - some biological (like brain chemistry), some cultural (like education) and other psychological (like life experiences or traumas).

 

I think our species was more or less forced to operate this way. For thousands of years, we relied on each other for our survival and so the idea that "today you share my burden and tomorrow I'll share yours" is probably part of the many strategies that we've developed to last as long as possible.

 

At the end of the day "fluid interpersonal boundries" might be something that you find in every environment where humans struggle due to poverty, violence, etc... Surviving prisons without friends for example might be harder.

 

Just my 2 cents on this :))

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...
""