Jump to content

Activist Mike Rayong leaves Thailand, citing safety and freedom


snoop1130

Recommended Posts

So, does anyone have background knowledge on his activities & what he stands for?

 

Has he spent time in prison for lèse-majesté matters? What political crimes have been committed against him? ...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, scorecard said:

 

And the reality is that even foreigners (me 35 years and a PR) don't really fully  understand the system, the inuendo, the law, the politics etc.

 

My Thai adult son (40 yo, wife, 4 kids) speaks reads / writes fluent Thai and English and has strong capability with the Essan language.

 

He follows these subjects daily and tells me often there's things happening which horrify him but he doesn't speak out because he has a very good income from his professional career and puts a lot of time and effort into getting his 4 kids well educated and well provided for. And it can be quite dangerous to speak out.

 

How anybody approaches such situations is ultimately personal choice and their choice should be respected.  

A sensible son, keep your head down and thoughts to yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, hotchilli said:

A sensible son, keep your head down and thoughts to yourself.

Sure but he has great concerns for the future of Thailand, the lack of development, the lack of a strong focused high performing government free of nepotism, cronyism and family dynasties, and for the future for his kids. 

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dinsdale said:

A clear reaction to the weaponisation of Section 112.

 

Sure that frightens my son but he is not about to say anything to anybody. That would do quite some damage to his current job situation and to his reputation and he would never do anything which might cause any issues / damage to his 4 kids. 

  • Thumbs Up 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hunz Kittisak said:

If he’s sent to jail will the people here label him as a criminal, a felon, a convict? 
Or sympathize that it’s all politically motivated?

 

 That's not going to happen, my son never says anything.

 

If he did go to jail he would be dismissed from his very job job and would never get a good position like this again. Not going to happen.

 

Yes others know that it's all politically driven but son needs to win new contracts and some potential clients would see the 'politically driven' angle, others not. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, john donson said:

come on, he can't take his mother to cambodia or other neighbor country?

 

Have to consider whether she could survive in another culture, no friends, food not the same etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, scorecard said:

 

Have to consider whether she could survive in another culture, no friends, food not the same etc. 

She must be of advanced years , he could have just put his crusade on hold  until nature takes its course

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, rtco said:

Stupid post ... then he becomes a non-activist

But would at least be able to achieve something , IE  care of his ailing mother.   His activist activities will achieve nothing  except his incarceration or worse

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Bday Prang said:

Real activists stay and fight ,  he has chosen to run away ,  He has now  lost  any credibility or influence he may have had.   Should have just agreed to  keep  his mouth shut, he could then have looked after his mother.  his political protests will never amount to anything significant, especially once he leaves.   He is wasting his time  and acting selfishly 

Where will he go to anyway ?  his options are limited unless he has some secret wealth, Dubai is not cheap

 

How do you propose that he stay and fight?  Do you even know who he is and the campaign mounted against him?

He has not chosen to run away. He was forced into exile.

How has he lost "any credibility or influence he may have had" ? He will be able to continue his activity from the safety of New Zealand. Had he remained in Thailand, he would have been sent to a  prison where he would have been subject to  physical violence. He can look after his mother now. Had he remained, he would be unable to take care of her.

 

I note that New Zealand is a Constitutional Monarchy and King Charles III, is the head of state.  New Zealand, acting on behalf of the Crown, protects the rights of all, including political refugees.

  • Love It 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

Since Thailand is not a democracy, with very, very small men, with a lot of power, who lack any vision, and insist on using draconian and outdated laws to stifle freedom of speech, and freedom of the press, the nation continues its backwards march into oblivion and irrelevancy. 

 

Not a good place to be if you are an outspoken activist. 

 

They've been attacked abroad as well, there appears to be nowhere they can hide from the evil empire of Thailand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Bday Prang said:

Real activists stay and fight ,  he has chosen to run away ,  He has now  lost  any credibility or influence he may have had.   Should have just agreed to  keep  his mouth shut, he could then have looked after his mother.  his political protests will never amount to anything significant, especially once he leaves.   He is wasting his time  and acting selfishly 

Where will he go to anyway ?  his options are limited unless he has some secret wealth, Dubai is not cheap

 

"Rollox"!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...