Trump vs. Taylor Swift: A Battle He’s Bound to Lose

[OneMoreFarang]

On 9/20/2024 at 3:37 AM, Social Media said:

So, why would he and his supporters provoke such an influential figure?

 

That question implies that he and his supporters think before they do anything... 

[spidermike007]

1 hour ago, Cameroni said:

 

No, that's wrong. Swift's endorsement has cost her significant  support.

 

"Taylor Swift's reputation may have never been worse, at least with Republicans, new polling finds after the megastar endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris for president. 

 

The exclusive DailyMail.com poll conducted by J.L. Partners shows the full extent of the global superstars bad blood with the GOP after weighing in on the 2024 race earlier this month. 

 

It found Swift has become a victim of polarization with 57 percent of Republicans holding a negative view of the 34-year-old global superstar"

 

'It’s finally happened: Taylor Swift has turned from Miss Americana to The Archer in the political crossfire,' said James Johnson, co-founder of J.L. Partners. 

'She is now viewed like many other things in American discourse, from the economy to news networks: through a partisan lens,' he added.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13866165/taylor-swift-kamala-harris-daily-mail-poll.html

My guess is that she cares not one iota about what the political sphere is saying about her. At this point she's spoken her truth, she's acting from a place of moral conviction, and she can spare a few fans here and there. With a billion dollar net worth I don't think she's particularly concerned about selling a few less concert tickets.

 

So her 100,000 seat stadium concerts will sell out in 70 minutes and still instead of 68. 

 

Trump stands to lose far more with his continued hateful and ignorant tweets, than Swift. Every lost vote at this point costs the man dearly. 

 

See ya Big Don! 

 

 

Edited September 21 by spidermike007

[Cameroni]

13 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

My guess is that she cares not one iota about what the political sphere is saying about her. At this point she's spoken her truth, she's acting from a place of moral conviction, and she can spare a few fans here and there. With a billion dollar net worth I don't think she's particularly concerned about selling a few less concert tickets.

 

So her 100,000 seat stadium concerts will sell out in 70 minutes and still instead of 68. 

 

Trump stands to lose far more with his continued hateful and ignorant tweets, than Swift. Every lost vote at this point costs the man dearly. 

 

See ya Big Don! 

 

 

 

That's a fair point, she's most likely come to the end of her career now anyway at 34, her Gollum hunchback is probably more of a concern than 100 million Americans not wanting to hear her records. A new generation of singers is set to replace her, Rihanna and Lady Gaga in the near future anyway. Swift is one step away from "has-been". There's a whole train of new pop starlets waiting already.

 

https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-lists/pop-stars-to-watch-2024-1234951678/aiden-bassett-1234951697/

[placeholder]

31 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

That's a fair point, she's most likely come to the end of her career now anyway at 34, her Gollum hunchback is probably more of a concern than 100 million Americans not wanting to hear her records. A new generation of singers is set to replace her, Rihanna and Lady Gaga in the near future anyway. Swift is one step away from "has-been". There's a whole train of new pop starlets waiting already.

 

https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-lists/pop-stars-to-watch-2024-1234951678/aiden-bassett-1234951697/

I don't know if it was you who originally posted that bit about her back, but as the article noted it's better. But trust you to attack a woman based on her appearance. 

[placeholder]

37 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

That's a fair point, she's most likely come to the end of her career now anyway at 34, her Gollum hunchback is probably more of a concern than 100 million Americans not wanting to hear her records. A new generation of singers is set to replace her, Rihanna and Lady Gaga in the near future anyway. Swift is one step away from "has-been". There's a whole train of new pop starlets waiting already.

 

https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-lists/pop-stars-to-watch-2024-1234951678/aiden-bassett-1234951697/

And what you seem immune to understanding is that Swift's audience does not consist of teeny boppers. It's older people both men and women. They're not so fickle. And what a tragedy it is for her not to have 100 million Americans t

o interested in her music. That only leaves about 240 million.

And hundreds of millions others worldwide.

Edited September 21 by placeholder

[spidermike007]

1 hour ago, Cameroni said:

 

That's a fair point, she's most likely come to the end of her career now anyway at 34, her Gollum hunchback is probably more of a concern than 100 million Americans not wanting to hear her records. A new generation of singers is set to replace her, Rihanna and Lady Gaga in the near future anyway. Swift is one step away from "has-been". There's a whole train of new pop starlets waiting already.

 

https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-lists/pop-stars-to-watch-2024-1234951678/aiden-bassett-1234951697/

Delusion is a powerful thing. And to think it is all induced by devotion to a failing, dark force. 

 

I feel for you, it must be tough to be a Trump supporter, at this time, witnessing the decline of a once powerful man. 

[candide]

55 minutes ago, placeholder said:

And what you seem immune to understanding is that Swift's audience does not consist of teeny boppers. It's older people both men and women. They're not so fickle. And what a tragedy it is for her not to have 100 million Americans t

o interested in her music. That only leaves about 240 million.

And hundreds of millions others worldwide.

For the time being she's one of the most streamed artist on Spotify with more  than  90 million listeners/month....

 

[stevenl]

2 hours ago, Cameroni said:

 

That's a fair point, she's most likely come to the end of her career now anyway at 34, her Gollum hunchback is probably more of a concern than 100 million Americans not wanting to hear her records. A new generation of singers is set to replace her, Rihanna and Lady Gaga in the near future anyway. Swift is one step away from "has-been". There's a whole train of new pop starlets waiting already.

 

https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-lists/pop-stars-to-watch-2024-1234951678/aiden-bassett-1234951697/

So she's too old at 34 and will be replaced by a new generation like Rihanna, from 1988, and lady gaga, from 1986.

I'll leave the maths up to you 

[ModdaPunk]

On 9/19/2024 at 8:37 PM, Social Media said:

it’s an unwinnable fight against a cultural force too powerful to be easily dismissed

 

A singer for teenagers.

Pleaaase....

lol

 

I'm wondering why Trump even bothers with this garbage of an artist.

What is it gonna be tomorrow? I hate Star Wars The Acolyte?

Come on, man...

 

[placeholder]

Just now, ModdaPunk said:

 

A singer for teenagers.

Pleaaase....

lol

 

I'm wondering why Trump even bothers with this garbage of an artist.

What is it gonna be tomorrow? I hate Star Wars The Acolyte?

Come on, man...

 

Someone else who's clueless about her: You must be very old.

 

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1372971/taylor-swift-fans-by-generation/

[ModdaPunk]

7 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Someone else who's clueless about her: You must be very old.

 

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1372971/taylor-swift-fans-by-generation/

 

Shows how deep we've fallen.

30 yo have the maturity of 15 yo.

Sad.

Thanks though.

I've learn something.

 

That said when you look at her show, the crowd looks more like 20 yo.

 

 

Edited September 21 by ModdaPunk

[Cameroni]

4 hours ago, placeholder said:

I don't know if it was you who originally posted that bit about her back, but as the article noted it's better. 

 

Oh you mean this article? I think since it says "newly strained posture", her posture realignment is a continuing struggle.  I guess it explains her limited dance routine. Poor girl, all the money in the world is nothing with poor health. Hopefully she can make Travis stay, or she will really become that hunchbacked cat lady with a cane.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-13855533/Taylor-Swifts-Experts-bad-posture-transformation.html

 

Trump of course still standing tall and upright.

 

 

[Cameroni]

3 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

Delusion is a powerful thing. And to think it is all induced by devotion to a failing, dark force. 

 

I feel for you, it must be tough to be a Trump supporter, at this time, witnessing the decline of a once powerful man. 

 

Delusion is indeed a very powerful thing. However, the only dark force here is a self-obsessed 34 year old billionaire who is teaching the young girls of America that sleeping around is fine and dandy. Disgusting.

 

I feel for anybody taking political advice from  an ink pot into which so many fountain pens have been dipped.

 

It's not at all tough to support Donald Trump against something like this. He is still extremely lucid and virile and will be the 47th president.

Edited September 21 by Cameroni

[placeholder]

5 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

Oh you mean this article? I think since it says "newly strained posture", her posture realignment is a continuing struggle.  I guess it explains her limited dance routine. Poor girl, all the money in the world is nothing with poor health. Hopefully she can make Travis stay, or she will really become that hunchbacked cat lady with a cane.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-13855533/Taylor-Swifts-Experts-bad-posture-transformation.html

 

Trump of course still standing tall and upright.

 

 

Really? It says "newly strained posture"?  Where exactly? Still making things up much? 

[Hummin]

8 hours ago, Lacessit said:

It's probably fair to say Taylor may not have as many fans in 5-10 years. She will no doubt have a rusted on base, just like Trump. I know people who are still fans of the Bee Gees, and Elvis Presley.

 

Right now, she has considerable influence. IMO Trump would have done much better to keep his mouth shut, but we all know that is Mission Impossible.

It's all depending on where she wants to go in life! She is right now in power to do whatever she wants to do, and choose her path for the next decades. Many people with the it factor have the opportunity to create and do whatever they want to do, or pull back to producing, prioritise family, or ?? Basically it is up to her where she wants to go, or continue to stay as a power to influence people for good or bad. Depends where you stand

Edited September 21 by Hummin

[placeholder]

5 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

Delusion is indeed a very powerful thing. However, the only dark force here is a self-obsessed 34 year old billionaire who is teaching the young girls of America that sleeping around is fine and dandy. Disgusting.

 

I feel for anybody taking political advice from  an ink pot into which so many fountain pens have been dipped.

 

It's not at all tough to support Donald Trump against something like this. He is still extremely lucid and virile and will be the 47th president.

Sleeping around is bad because....?  And how about the certain presidential candidate whose pen has dipped into quite a lot of ink pots? What century are you living in? Maybe the early part of the 20th?

[Cameroni]

5 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Really? It says "newly strained posture"?  Where exactly? Still making things up much? 

 

Second paragraph, last words.

[Cameroni]

1 minute ago, placeholder said:

Sleeping around is bad because....?  And how about the certain presidential candidate whose pen has dipped into quite a lot of ink pots? What century are you living in? Maybe the early part of the 20th?

 

Let''s not confuse goose and gander here.

[placeholder]

1 minute ago, Cameroni said:

 

Second paragraph, last words.

I find myself, once again, correcting a misreading of yours: "her newly straightened posture" I put the word in question in boldface just to help you out.

[placeholder]

6 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

Let''s not confuse goose and gander here.

Make that the 19th century.

Edited September 21 by placeholder

[stoner]

13 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Sleeping around is bad because....? 

 

she will unlikely be able to form and hold onto a long term relationship. if she wants to be single so be it her choice. but lets not pretend that men are lining up to marry a girl who has been run through by a lot of guys. 

 

[placeholder]

17 minutes ago, stoner said:

 

she will unlikely be able to form and hold onto a long term relationship. if she wants to be single so be it her choice. but lets not pretend that men are lining up to marry a girl who has been run through by a lot of guys. 

 

She's 34 years old, greatly talented, heads a highly successful  organization, seems remarkably clear-headed, and treats her workers and fans well. And to you she's a girl?   I daresay  there are men born as far back as the 20th century who would be ecstatic to marry such a woman. And then there are the old fogies who focus on whether or not a woman is marriageable. As though that were a crucial thing.

[placeholder]

38 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

Let''s not confuse goose and gander here.

I know of one gander who's a candidate for President who has dipped his pen in a inkpot where possibly hundreds of other men have dipped theirs. And yet you don't find this repugnant?

[placeholder]

57 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

Delusion is indeed a very powerful thing. However, the only dark force here is a self-obsessed 34 year old billionaire who is teaching the young girls of America that sleeping around is fine and dandy. Disgusting.

 

I feel for anybody taking political advice from  an ink pot into which so many fountain pens have been dipped.

 

It's not at all tough to support Donald Trump against something like this. He is still extremely lucid and virile and will be the 47th president.

I was going to call your obsession with Taylor Swift's body weird, and only compounded by that bizarre misreading of yours. But I think a better word is creepy. Genuinely creepy.

Edited September 21 by placeholder

[stoner]

35 minutes ago, placeholder said:

She's 34 years old, greatly talented, heads a highly successful  organization, seems remarkably clear-headed, and treats her workers and fans well. And to you she's a girl?   I daresay  there are men born as far back as the 20th century who would be ecstatic to marry such a woman. And then there are the old fogies who focus on whether or not a woman is marriageable. As though that were a crucial thing.

 

strange answer. old fogies eh ? you are older than i am sir. 

 

if she is such a hit with the men how is it she is still single. so much going on for her yet can't manage to hold a man down.....even after dating sooooo many different men. 

 

but you keep voicing your personal opinion and clear unbridled love for the woman. 

[Cameroni]

1 hour ago, placeholder said:

I find myself, once again, correcting a misreading of yours: "her newly straightened posture" I put the word in question in boldface just to help you out.

 

What they mean, obviously, is that she is now undergoing a back straigthening posture correction. Hence her posture currently is rigidly straight. This is the procedure.

[Cameroni]

43 minutes ago, placeholder said:

I know of one gander who's a candidate for President who has dipped his pen in a inkpot where possibly hundreds of other men have dipped theirs. And yet you don't find this repugnant?

'

He's not a serial dater like Swift. 12 exes. That's repugnant.

 

Straying now and then, well, boys will be boys.

[mdr224]

2 hours ago, placeholder said:

I was going to call your obsession with Taylor Swift's body weird, and only compounded by that bizarre misreading of yours. But I think a better word is creepy. Genuinely creepy.

You are unable to think critically. You like most liberals only see things on the surface

[placeholder]

8 hours ago, Cameroni said:

 

What they mean, obviously, is that she is now undergoing a back straigthening posture correction. Hence her posture currently is rigidly straight. This is the procedure.

Making things up much? There was nothing at all about her currently undergoing anything. According to the speculation in the article, she has undergone some sort of correction. Past tense. Nor was their any comment about her "rigidly straight" posture. Keep flailing.

[placeholder]

8 hours ago, Cameroni said:

'

He's not a serial dater like Swift. 12 exes. That's repugnant.

 

Straying now and then, well, boys will be boys.

I now know what actors in a certain kind of science fiction movie are supposed to feel when they encounter a  newly revived caveman.