Jump to content

Trump Challenges Special Counsel's Evidence Release in Election Case


Social Media

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

I only said to Walker88 that he could've mentioned all were under subpoena.

I didn't need to have it explained to me how the grand jury system works.

All witnesses are subpoenaed. Friendly or not. It is how they schedule the hearings.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


1 hour ago, BarraMarra said:

The problem from an outsider like me is anyone goes against Trump and his supporters are liars, or out to get him. He and his supporters will never accept anything either Vote results or jury decisions that go against him and anything he says his supporters believe. Even film evidence is classed as a stitch up or a witch hunt against him. Like i said in previous threads if Trump said the Earth is flat his supporters believe it must be then. 

 

So much for the outsider stuff then

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

'“It’s really hard to do highlights because this is bombshell after bombshell after bombshell,” Weissmann said of the 165-page brief prepared by special counsel Jack Smith’s office.

“I mean, this is Watergate over and over again, the idea that this is a cancer on the presidency.”'

 

Stunned Ex-Prosecutor Sums Up New Trump Filing: ‘Bombshell After Bombshell After Bombshell’

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, G_Money said:


And when he wins in November you’ll be addressing him as Mr President.

 

Your new Commander in Chief.

 

He's toast. He will die in jail

5 hours ago, G_Money said:


Insert Harris Delete Trump.  Insert conwoman Delete conman.

 

I couldn’t of said it any better.

Of course you not only have nothing to back up your claim of Harris being a conwoman, you do it with childish grammar.

 

"I couldn't HAVE said it better", not "couldn't of"

 

Maybe you need to go back to 3rd grade.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, jerrymahoney said:

Simple. The testimony was not voluntary.

Of course it wasn’t first there’s partisanship but a very real terrifying 2ond theres trumps absolute willingness to send his most deranged supporters after you and your family as proven by Mike pences testimony.Kudos Mike Pence for having the strength of character and courage to honor your oath of office.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Walker88 said:

 

He's toast. He will die in jail

Of course you not only have nothing to back up your claim of Harris being a conwoman, you do it with childish grammar.

 

"I couldn't HAVE said it better", not "couldn't of"

 

Maybe you need to go back to 3rd grade.

 

“He’s toast.  He will die in Jail.”

 

How many times have we heard this?  But, but this time it’s for real.  Speaking of backing up a claim.  Where’s yours?  When was he sentenced to life in federal prison, not jail?  I must of missed that one.  
 

Your source?  The View or Jimmy Kimmel?
 

Showing signs of distress when all you have is a petty grammar mistake to come back with.  
 

Your time away from Langley is showing.  That CIA issued toughness has worn off.
 

Check your other comrades posts.  You’ll remain occupied with your obsession.

 

I would add more but have to land.


 

 

IMG_4213.jpeg

Edited by G_Money
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, candide said:

The title is misleading. Trump is not chalenging evidence. He's just whining, as usual! 😀

Shocking.  😲

 

He almost never does that.

 

 

Edited by shdmn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   1 member










×
×
  • Create New...