Jump to content

Harris Lies, Americans Die. Illegal Aliens are more Important


Yagoda

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Except AOC is intelligent and literate.

Only in the eyes of the uneducated.

 

She got a big ol fat booty though. Remember when she was shaking it on video?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

She never prosecuted anyone

https://tennesseestar.com/news/shes-a-liar-former-doj-official-jeff-clark-reacts-to-not-finding-a-single-case-prosecuted-by-kamala-harris/khousler/2024/09/30/

 

Note: Yes, the same Jeffrey Clark lawfare disbarred in Washington for Jan 6 advice. But thats what appeals courts are for.

Wow.

 

As the election nears, the lies get stupider.

 

I'm sure you got an email about this, and dutifully posted it, but you never checked it out.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Yagoda said:

Tell us who she prosecuted then? Who did she get into that courtroom against?

 

I know she directed her office to jail weed users and give breaks to murderers. What cartels did they prosecute?

She worked as a courtroom prosecutor in Alameda county 1990-1998. Did about 50 cases.

 

You got fooled by your internet friends.

  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Only in the eyes of the uneducated.

 

She got a big ol fat booty though. Remember when she was shaking it on video?

Still with the insults instead of answers. Boebert is more into public displays but that is also irrelevant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, impulse said:

 

AOC bumped up against the Peter Principle as a barkeep.  Her options for advancement were OnlyFans, or running as a Dem.

 

Yes, the only person ever to do service work to pay for her college education. For onlyfans, you can find the high school dropout from CO-3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Yagoda said:

She never prosecuted anyone

https://tennesseestar.com/news/shes-a-liar-former-doj-official-jeff-clark-reacts-to-not-finding-a-single-case-prosecuted-by-kamala-harris/khousler/2024/09/30/

 

Note: Yes, the same Jeffrey Clark lawfare disbarred in Washington for Jan 6 advice. But thats what appeals courts are for.

Good catch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Still with the insults instead of answers. Boebert is more into public displays but that is also irrelevant.

Boeberts hideous. I wouldnt do her with your schvanz. Ewwwwwww. Much rather have AOC. As long as she keeps her mouth shut for talking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, impulse said:

 

You mean like Judge Joe Brown?

 

Judge Joe Brown Attacks Kamala Harris, Says She Has a Lazy Reputation

 

https://blacknews.com/news/judge-joe-brown-attacks-kamala-harris-says-she-has-lazy-reputation/

 

The interview began with Brown bluntly calling Harris a “piece of sh*t” and questioning her “professional competence” as a lawyer. He went on to accuse her of relying on flirtation rather than skill in the courtroom, claiming she had a reputation for being “lazy” among her peers and often “hiking up her hemline when she needed influence.”

 

Wonder why the Propaganda Arm of the Democratic Party has kept that one quiet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Because it is not worth platforming lies.

How do you know its a lie? Investigation? Talking to her peers at the time?

 

Another censorship lover.

Edited by Yagoda
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

How do you know its a lie? Investigation? Talking to her peers at the time?

 

Another censorship lover.

Since when does a MAGA moron accept evidence of anything? You have already denied evidence of fraud, theft, sexual assault, espionage, sedition and betrayal, but now you are willing to accept slander as fact? Your acuity is not impressing me.

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Better a MAGA moron than a racist fascist lickspittle who never is able to back up anything. 

 

Evidence are facts. Fact. Kamala got her job from being Willie Browns gf. Fact: She cant give us any case she ever tried, nor can you.

 

Yet you use the word slander LOL.

 

You have evidence Kamala committed espionage? Give it to us?

Plenty of evidence in Mar A Largo for Trumps crimes, plenty in D.C. and New York too. We have barely gotten started in Georgia, Arizona and Michigan. The man is headed for prison.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Except none of that is true, especially the last part.

Oh, you care about truth now. Thats rich. Got caught too many times? Russia? Very fine people? National Abortion Bans?

 

Makes you nervous about folks seeing that, huh

 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Oh, you care about truth now. Thats rich. Got caught too many times? Russia? Very fine people? National Abortion Bans?

 

Makes you nervous about folks seeing that, huh

 

 

Russia is true, The very fine people moved from Charlottesville to the Capitol to start another riot and the national abortion ban is part of 2025 that Vance helped write for Peter Thiel. So yes, like that.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Russia is true, The very fine people moved from Charlottesville to the Capitol to start another riot and the national abortion ban is part of 2025 that Vance helped write for Peter Thiel. So yes, like that.

You should go over to the conspiracy theory topic.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

and the national abortion ban is part of 2025

 

It's not actually. Project 2025 just says all should be done to make abortion more difficult, but it does not support an outright ban on abortion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

It's not actually. Project 2025 just says all should be done to make abortion more difficult, but it does not support an outright ban on abortion.

Dont worry, hes never read it. None of them have. Its just slogans

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...