Jump to content








Thailand triumphs in UN Human Rights council bid


snoop1130

Recommended Posts


1 hour ago, dinsdale said:

Weaponising Section 112 is obviously not a threat to individual human rights. I'm not surprised by this as the UN is now more of a mouthpiece for Arab nations.

 

But deporting asylum seekers probably is?

Totally agree with your last statement though.

Edited by Tropicalevo
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

securing a coveted three-year term to champion human rights across the globe. The decision was revealed yesterday, October 9, following a secret ballot by the UN.

I am curious how the UN can accept this bid knowing full well the status of Thailands worldwide Human Abuse record. 

https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/asia-and-the-pacific/south-east-asia-and-the-pacific/thailand/

 

At any rate. At least now Thailand is in a position to compare themselves with other countries firsthand and change their status also. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, dinsdale said:

Weaponising Section 112 is obviously not a threat to individual human rights. I'm not surprised by this as the UN is now more of a mouthpiece for Arab nations.

Saudi Arabia’s failure to secure a seat  🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is one reason why most people see the UN as a joke, allowing a nation that violates so many human rights to actually take a seat... seems the UN allows supression of human rights.. should be renamed United Nations Anit-Human Rights Council.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Kinnock said:

The UN is an expensive joke.  

 

They are powerless when action is needed and powerful in matters of no importance.

I realized that a long time ago. All these 'high profile' humanitarian organizations are the same. They are rich. They collect money for the poor and war effected and enjoy the bigger share on themselves. I know the luxurious life they lead, as I had the opportunity to work for one for awhile!

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Aussie999 said:

This is one reason why most people see the UN as a joke, allowing a nation that violates so many human rights to actually take a seat... seems the UN allows supression of human rights.. should be renamed United Nations Anit-Human Rights Council.

 

This is one reason why most people see the UN as a joke, - It is, no doubt.

 

allowing a nation that violates so many human rights to actually take a seat... - do you really mean just ONLY ONE of those nations? Are ALL others therein perfect?

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thesetat2013 said:

I am curious how the UN can accept this bid knowing full well the status of Thailands worldwide Human Abuse record. 

https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/asia-and-the-pacific/south-east-asia-and-the-pacific/thailand/

 

At any rate. At least now Thailand is in a position to compare themselves with other countries firsthand and change their status also. 

compare themselves with other countries firsthand and change their status also

 

OMG I hope NOT!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

Screenshot-2024-10-10-131025.jpg

 

Thailand emerged victorious in its bid to join the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) with an impressive 177 votes—the highest of all candidates—securing a coveted three-year term to champion human rights across the globe. The decision was revealed yesterday, October 9, following a secret ballot by the UN.

 

In a closely watched contest, Cyprus and Qatar each received 167 votes, followed by South Korea with 161, and the Marshall Islands with 120. However, Saudi Arabia’s campaign failed, gathering just 117 votes, the lowest among the six candidates for five available seats.

 

Thailand’s successful bid comes at a critical time, as the nation seeks to boost its international reputation following the recent election of a new government. With a focus on promoting dialogue among UNHRC members and enhancing the capacity to protect rights and freedoms, Thailand’s campaign struck a chord with UN members.

 

The UNHRC, established in 2006, is responsible for strengthening the protection of human rights worldwide. It consists of 47 member countries, divided into five regional groups. Alongside Thailand, Ethiopia and Qatar were among the 18 nations elected to serve three-year terms on the council.


Saudi Arabia’s failure to secure a seat was met with applause from human rights groups. Reprieve, a campaign group, stated, “For far too long, [Crown Prince] Mohammed bin Salman’s regime has acted as if it has complete impunity to commit grave human rights abuses.”

 

Tess McEvoy, Programme Director at the International Service for Human Rights, added, “States voted down the less deserving candidate, refusing to hand powerful actors who violate basic rights an ability to bend key human rights processes in their favour.”

 

With this victory, Thailand is set to begin its term in 2024, alongside fellow winners from Africa, Asia-Pacific, and other regions, reported Thai PBS World.

 

By Puntid Tantivangphaisal

Photo courtesy of Thai PBS World

 

Source: The Thaiger

-- 2024-10-10

 

news-footer-2.png

 

image.png

Congratulations, Thailand!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, retarius said:

A good thing. All Thailand's Human Rights violations will be in the spotlight as a member of this committee, and that can only be good news for its citizens. 

Always look at the bright side - be positive!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disgusting vote of approval. Fails in so many ways to recognize reality of human rights in Thailand. Case in point:

The International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) called on the Thai authorities to do much more to make its protections real in practice. One year on, authorities have fallen short in implementing the landmark Anti-torture and Enforced Disappearance Act. https://www.icj.org/ Feb 22, 2024:

  • While welcoming the implementation of certain preventive measures contained in the Anti-torture and Enforced Disappearance Act, the ICJ is concerned at the failure to provide proper training for responsible authorities on enforcement and to ensure prompt, thorough, and effective investigation and prosecutions in cases of alleged torture and enforced disappearances.

PM Prayut sought to delay implementation but the Constitutional Court affirmed he had no authority to delay the Act and ordered immediate implementation. Fast forward two successive PM's and I see no public confirmation by the government that the Act has been fully implemented.

 

Consequences: According to the Ministry of Justice, as of November 2023, since the Act came into force, there had been 57 complaints involving 27 allegations of torture, six allegations of enforced disappearance, and 24 allegations of ill-treatment falling short of torture, with investigations ceasing in 4 cases and 53 cases pending.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...