That didn't take long. Regarding no tax on tips, lower corporate taxes, no tax on Social Security benefits.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/07/us/politics/trump-fiscal-republicans.html

Trump Agenda Faces a Fiscal Reckoning

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has estimated that just continuing all of the expiring provisions would cost roughly $4 trillion over a decade, and Mr. Trump’s campaign proposals could add trillions more to the debt.

 Markets and investors are preparing for higher deficits under a second Trump administration, selling bonds that could become less valuable if the government has to issue many more to finance a larger debt.

The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget has estimated that Mr. Trump’s agenda, including higher tariffs, could add roughly $7.5 trillion to the debt over the next decade.

Your post does not say Trump is walking back his promises.

1 minute ago, Purdey said:

Your post does not say Trump is walking back his promises.

It also doesn't say Daffy Duck is walking back his promises. What's your point?

4 minutes ago, Peabody said:

It also doesn't say Daffy Duck is walking back his promises. What's your point?

I think it that you are lying, intentionally or otherwise. 

4 minutes ago, Peabody said:

It also doesn't say Daffy Duck is walking back his promises. What's your point?

It doesn't say Trump or the Republican Party is walking back anything. Read the words "The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office

Your headline says: Republicans begin walking back campaign promises

6 minutes ago, Purdey said:

It doesn't say Trump or the Republican Party is walking back anything. Read the words "The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office

Your headline says: Republicans begin walking back campaign promises

You'd have to read the article. I just posted some allowed highlights. Behind a paywall, so you may not be able to read the full article.

5 minutes ago, Peabody said:

You'd have to read the article. I just posted some allowed highlights. Behind a paywall, so you may not be able to read the full article.

OK. You could have made it more... to the point, shall we say, by mentioning what Trump's advisors are saying.

Just went to the article and it is paywalled as you mentioned. Not much use to me.

Just now, Purdey said:

OK. You could have made it more... to the point, shall we say.

I originally posted much more, but that violates Forum rules, so only included relevant bits. The extended headline is Advisers to President-elect Donald J. Trump and Republicans on Capitol Hill are already looking at ways to scale back some of his more expensive ideas.

1 minute ago, Peabody said:

I originally posted much more, but that violates Forum rules, so only included relevant bits. The extended headline is Advisers to President-elect Donald J. Trump and Republicans on Capitol Hill are already looking at ways to scale back some of his more expensive ideas.

That would have been more helpful.

2 minutes ago, Peabody said:

I originally posted much more, but that violates Forum rules, so only included relevant bits. The extended headline is Advisers to President-elect Donald J. Trump and Republicans on Capitol Hill are already looking at ways to scale back some of his more expensive ideas.

The same NYT that call the Hunter laptop story fake, and the Russia collusion story real.

 

They are lying whores that will say anything to hurt Trump and his agenda.

2 minutes ago, mogandave said:

The same NYT that call the Hunter laptop story fake, and the Russia collusion story real.

 

They are lying whores that will say anything to hurt Trump and his agenda.

See you still haven't read the article. They quote Republicans. Are you claiming these Republicans didn't say what you didn't read?  🙂

17 minutes ago, Peabody said:

See you still haven't read the article. They quote Republicans. Are you claiming these Republicans didn't say what you didn't read?  🙂

The NYT and other media outlets are notorious for contorting facts. Please state exactly who what where when straight from the horses mouth as opposed to some fear mongering rag hack. 

15 minutes ago, Peabody said:

See you still haven't read the article. They quote Republicans. Are you claiming these Republicans didn't say what you didn't read?  🙂

No. I am saying that the New York Times is a lying whore of a newspaper that will say anything that hurts Trump and or his agenda. 
 

I am sorry I was not more clear the first time. 

 

Which Republicans did they quote, what was the quote, and what was the context? 

 

 

 

 

Talk about clickbait titles!

"Republicans begin walking back campaign promises"

 

The relevant part of the article you managed to post stated a nonpartisan group had made a report indicating Trump's proposals......the same proposals that loser Harris had also stolen and promised.......would increase the deficit.  No mention of the effect Musk taking a chainsaw to bloated government waste would more than offset this.

 

No-one is walking back anything. 

 

You now claim that some are "already looking at ways to scale back some of his more expensive ideas." 

 

Shirley, you'll be more gracious when Vance wins the presidency in 2028!

 

In other words, "Do better!"

 

 

1 minute ago, novacova said:

The NYT and other media outlets are notorious for contorting facts. Please state exactly who what where when straight from the horses mouth as opposed to some fear mongering rag hack. 

“Sources close to Trump claim” 

 

 

Just now, NoDisplayName said:

Talk about clickbait titles!

"Republicans begin walking back campaign promises"

 

The relevant part of the article you managed to post stated a nonpartisan group had made a report indicating Trump's proposals......the same proposals that loser Harris had also stolen and promised.......would increase the deficit.  No mention of the effect Musk taking a chainsaw to bloated government waste would more than offset this.

 

No-one is walking back anything. 

 

You now claim that some are "already looking at ways to scale back some of his more expensive ideas." 

 

Shirley, you'll be more gracious when Vance wins the presidency in 2028!

 

In other words, "Do better!"

 

 

The left lost the election because they are liars. So now they need to regroup and lie harder..,,

Just now, mogandave said:

“Sources close to Trump claim” 

 

 

What a joke, what’s the source? Donkeys rear end opening? 

All of you should read the actual article. The NYT gives non-subscribers 10 free reads/month.

1 minute ago, Peabody said:

All of you should read the actual article. The NYT gives non-subscribers 10 free reads/month.

 

If I stated some disinformation as dog's own truth, would you rush out to read it in Pravda?

 

What if they gave you 10 communist propaganda articles for freezies?

17 minutes ago, Peabody said:

All of you should read the actual article. The NYT gives non-subscribers 10 free reads/month.

Are you here peddling the leading leftist bs propaganda rag in the US? What’s your commission rate?

2 minutes ago, NoDisplayName said:

 

If I stated some disinformation as dog's own truth, would you rush out to read it in Pravda?

 

What if they gave you 10 communist propaganda articles for freezies?

Continue in your blissful ignorance and keep deflecting. What does Pravda have to do with NYT?

20 minutes ago, Peabody said:

All of you should read the actual article. The NYT gives non-subscribers 10 free reads/month.

Why don’t you read it and answer the questions? 

 

 

14 minutes ago, Peabody said:

Continue in your blissful ignorance and keep deflecting. What does Pravda have to do with NYT?

They are adhere to that same ideology 

1 hour ago, mogandave said:

The same NYT that call the Hunter laptop story fake, and the Russia collusion story real.

 

They are lying whores that will say anything to hurt Trump and his agenda.

 trump and lies - there's a story.

I have moved this topic to the political soapbox, as forum rules for the original home country forum states.

 

“For topics and events related to the US and Canada. Political news topics are not permitted.”

For those who may have been stymied by the NYT paywall, I'm gifting this to you:

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/07/us/politics/trump-fiscal-republicans.html?unlocked_article_code=1.YU4.JMrW.0wkYymnx0V6H&smid=url-share

Just now, Etaoin Shrdlu said:

For those who may have been stymied by the NYT paywall, I'm gifting this to you:

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/07/us/politics/trump-fiscal-republicans.html?unlocked_article_code=1.YU4.JMrW.0wkYymnx0V6H&smid=url-share

Thanks, ES. They don't want to read it. Facts violate their universe.

2 minutes ago, Peabody said:

Thanks, ES. They don't want to read it. Facts violate their universe.

 

They have alternate facts, aka lies.

So the OP pretends to have read the article, but is unable to answer simple questions. 

 

16 minutes ago, Etaoin Shrdlu said:

 

They have alternate facts, aka lies.

What “facts “ are in dispute? No facts have been provided by you or the OP.

1 hour ago, Purdey said:

That would have been more helpful.

I have to agree as your article should only have been about walking back promises, not the fact that many promises might find difficulty in finding Congressional dollars to accomplish.