Jump to content

Will Trump deport the LEGAL Haitian migrants in Ohio as promised?


Jingthing

Recommended Posts

33 minutes ago, Cryingdick said:

I don't know about threats I am not the FBI, as such not privy to that info. I do know that my husband works remotely for a company in Columbus OH. His colleagues don't leave their pets outside these days.

 

Because eating pets is way worse than making bomb threats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, frank83628 said:

the irony of you saying somoene doesn't have a clue what theyre is talking about.

 

JB was a warmonger, he tried to push  a war with Iran, Trump sacked him soon after.

Trump doesn't have a clue what he is talking about, more links for you to cringe over today.

Have fun...😋

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, herfiehandbag said:

In the words of a (fellow?) Scouser:

"Eh, eh, eh, calm down, calm down!"

 

Your posts are beginning to sound more and more like Julius Streicher's editorials!

 

 

In not a barely human, filthy Scouser eating rats in a council house, Im Manchester United.

 

Julius Streicher was a committed Socialist btw

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Cryingdick said:

Say that when you show up to JFK airport and you only have the right to ask the agent on the ground permission to enter. Go to the UK which is even worse. Even a visa is only permission to ask for entry it doesn't guarantee it. You can be denied entry for any reason.


Wouldn't it be easier to just man up and admit you were wrong?
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

In not a barely human, filthy Scouser eating rats in a council house, Im Manchester United.

 

Julius Streicher was a committed Socialist btw

 

Is this another case of Socialist = Communist?

 

one of the various radical-nationalist organizations that sprang up in the wake of the failed German Communist revolution of 1918.[8] Such groups fostered the view that Jews and Bolsheviks were synonymous, and that they were traitors trying to subject Germany to Communist rule.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julius_Streicher

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

 

Is this another case of Socialist = Communist?

 

one of the various radical-nationalist organizations that sprang up in the wake of the failed German Communist revolution of 1918.[8] Such groups fostered the view that Jews and Bolsheviks were synonymous, and that they were traitors trying to subject Germany to Communist rule.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julius_Streicher

Start the debate anytime you want, you wont win or even be able to argue with Wikpedia

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Back off Buster!

 

Both Trump and Vance have promised to deport ALL the Springfield Haitians who are legal based on the temporary emergency status for Haitians posted before  Those sleazeball hate mongering demagogues intentionally falsely call them illegals though. They can be deported as a class by revoking the temporary emergency status.

 

 

Source? or is this just another "Put Liz Cheney in front of a firing squad moment?" I love how you keep calling them "sleazeball hate mongering demagogues" and yet the worst vitriol comes from people like you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pattayasan said:

 

Is this another case of Socialist = Communist?

 

one of the various radical-nationalist organizations that sprang up in the wake of the failed German Communist revolution of 1918.[8] Such groups fostered the view that Jews and Bolsheviks were synonymous, and that they were traitors trying to subject Germany to Communist rule.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julius_Streicher

I think 1918 has zero to do with 2024, your whole trumps a Nazi was in part why your screechy side lost.

P.S TRUMP WON

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Jingthing said:

No idea what you're attempting to say here.

The legal Haitians in Springfield who Trump Vance know are legal under the emergency program for Haitians yet they disgustingly call illegal are indeed being targeted for deporting by those scapegoating sleaze  buckets and yes Trump as President will have the power to deport those legal migrants. Woof Woof.

 

Not sure what you're trying to say here.


A program to bring in millions of illegals "legally" to circumvent immigration law is bizarre. 

 

Ending the program will allow deportation, then they can go to embassies or consulates and get in line and apply like all the other brain scientists and rocket surgeons.

 

Trucking in tens of millions, spending billions on socialist programs, all in the hopes of creating new voters all dependent on your regime's government programs is democracy. 

 

Winning the electoral vote, all the swing states, and the popular vote by a yuuuuuuuuuuuge margin is totalitarian.

 

 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Jingthing said:

it takes a little longer the hearing process won't prevent it.

The hearing process is adjudication by an immigration judge within Department of Homeland Security. It's unlikely Trump nominations have infiltrated DHS to the extent that the Rule of Law will be abrogated.

So undocumented immigrants will get a fair and impartial review. Depending on information regarding the immigrants presence in the US under US asylum laws, they may be granted permanent stay in the US or deported. 

But the current problem is more judges are needed to shorten the time gor adjudication. POTUS Trump refused to increase number of immigration judges and subsequent MAGA congressmen continued refusal to government requests.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, 0ffshore360 said:

No doubt the historical status quo of ignoring unpaid expenses will continue at the expense of local  administrations who can either cut funding for local communities or increase local taxes.

 

"... either cut funding for local communities or increase local taxes".

 

But probably make his MAGA thugs very angry and ready for revenge.

Edited by scorecard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Specifically Springfield Ohio.

Of the they're eating the dogs they're eating the cats infamy.

But that was a racist lie.

But Trump Vance have promised to deport those hard working legal migrants anyway who are doing jobs citizens won't take.

I have learned dictator on day one Trump can't unilaterily deport them because they are legal because they do have a right to a hearing. But he can still effectively deport them just by adding that extra step. So takes longer and costs more.

 

So do you think he will actually go ahead with deporting them?

 

Or will he end up being all bark all meow no bite no claw and let them stay after all?

 

 

Impossible to deport all of the illegal’s, but he will start with the criminals. Obama deported >6,000,000 - of course Barry was racist too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Cryingdick said:

Why are you so hell bent on these people staying?

They have qualified for legal immigration, do you not understand that concept?

Do you really think that it's correct to deport legal immigrants?

Where does that hatred and racism come from?

I truly understand the desire amongst people to deport illegal aliens, but legal immigrants and people who have been in the US their whole life?

 

Please just try to establish a small modicum of common sense, and decency. 

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LosLobo said:


People legally in the U.S.—whether they’re citizens, visa holders, asylum seekers, or permanent residents—do indeed have rights, including due process and protection from discrimination.

The Constitution doesn’t limit basic rights only to citizens; it protects persons under the law.
 

Even undocumented folks have certain protections, and visa holders absolutely have the right to fair treatment.

Interpretation: The Equal Protection Clause | Constitution Center

Aliens in the United States | Constitution Annotated | Congress.gov | Library of Congress

Don't tell that to haters and the racists. They somehow think the US can function without an immigrant workforce. Such delusion. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jingthing said:

He will be able. All he has to is cancel their temporary emergency status for Haiti and pay for required hearings which won't make make any difference if their status is cancelled.

How can he not do this after he has promised this so loudly?

They're eating the dogs. They're eating the cats.

The world press will be watching Springfield specifically because of that.

He will only carry out a very small percentage of his promises, just like in his last administration, so it's just a question of which ones he prioritizes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

Don't tell that to haters and the racists. They somehow think the US can function without an immigrant workforce. Such delusion. 

You are confused.... it is not the immigrants that are there legally that people worry about. It is those illegals that people hate or are racist to.  The US can not function without an immigrant workforce (true) but they can function better without the illegal immigrants taking jobs away for a pittance plus collecting benefits from the government and its citizens. 

 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

 

Other than refugees, noncitizens living in the United States face significant restrictions on access to public benefits funded by the federal government, including programs such as Medicaid, food stamps (the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program), and cash assistance programs such as Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF). This is particularly the case for unauthorized immigrants, who except in very limited circumstances are barred from all federally funded public benefits. Immigrants on temporary visas, such as international students or seasonal workers, are likewise barred.

 

https://www.migrationpolicy.org/content/immigrants-public-benefits-us

MigrationPolicy.org

 

Could you not find anything on AlterNet?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, mogandave said:

Which of his promises would you like to see him make good on? 


Well, since we're talking about promises, let’s start with a classic: how about a commitment to actually preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution? Something he failed to do in his previous tenure.

Do you think anything has changed, or are we in for more of the same?

  • Love It 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Specifically Springfield Ohio.

Of the they're eating the dogs they're eating the cats infamy.

But that was a racist lie.

But Trump Vance have promised to deport those hard working legal migrants anyway who are doing jobs citizens won't take.

I have learned dictator on day one Trump can't unilaterily deport them because they are legal because they do have a right to a hearing. But he can still effectively deport them just by adding that extra step. So takes longer and costs more.

 

So do you think he will actually go ahead with deporting them?

 

Or will he end up being all bark all meow no bite no claw and let them stay after all?

 

 

Cats and dogs are, sadly. eaten in several countries around the world including Haiti. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...