Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 hours ago, oxo1947 said:

 

IN the last 70+ years the UK winner of elections having the majority of votes has only been once...Even Thatcher or the last landslide government in July (who got 33%)  votes didn't manage it--

 

Much the same in Oz ...etc  All of sudden when you lose very badly  --this becomes such an important Point........ :coffee1:

Irrelevant in the context of the U.S. two party system. 

  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
On 11/17/2024 at 10:54 AM, Jingthing said:

It's a fact genetically. 

Four days now after I asked the first time: 

 

Where is that Homosexual Gene?

Posted
1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

Four days now after I asked the first time: 

 

Where is that Homosexual Gene?

There is no evidence of a gay gene.  This was linked to a 1993 study which posited that a certain gene was linked to homosexuality but no other study was able to replicate it so it was debunked. 

 

What is interesting though is they know that a higher proportion of second children tend to be gay. This may be that if a mother has a boy the body produces an enhanced y chromosome to balance birth equality of the sexes to aid population growth. If this is the case then homosexuality is a perfectly natural condition of nature. Studies continue in this area.

 

They have attempted to prove a homophobia gene, but as yet there is no proof because the tiny brains of these people make study difficult. 😀 

  • Like 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, Baht Simpson said:

There is no evidence of a gay gene.  This was linked to a 1993 study which posited that a certain gene was linked to homosexuality but no other study was able to replicate it so it was debunked. 

 

What is interesting though is they know that a higher proportion of second children tend to be gay. This may be that if a mother has a boy the body produces an enhanced y chromosome to balance birth equality of the sexes to aid population growth. If this is the case then homosexuality is a perfectly natural condition of nature. Studies continue in this area.

 

They have attempted to prove a homophobia gene, but as yet there is no proof because the tiny brains of these people make study difficult. 😀 

Who is "they" lol?

 

Homophobia. I guess my question is whether that even exists, since the predicate of the "phobia" would be irrationality. Thats a term subject to manipulation by the homosexual lobby and their supposed "allies" in the Left*. Is it irrational to feel disgust by the behavior of homosexuals? How about Coprophilia? Is it ok to be coprophobic?

 

How does the rational disgust over unnatural things equate to hate?

 

* I use the term "allies" because the Left cares nothing for so called "gay rights", but merely views them as a weapon to smash "bourgeois" and Judeo Christian morality. Thus, the National Socialist Movement was led by proud homosexuals until power struggles mandated that their bohemian movement be disavowed and driven back underground. Similarly, "gay" life flourished under the Bolshevik NEP until again, politics mandated suppression. The reason is patently obvious: any "organization" of individuals outside that which is permitted by Socialism is a danger to the state. I would note that in National Socialist Germany, homosexuality was illegal, as it was in Bolshevik Russia, and still is,

Posted
9 hours ago, Jingthing said:

If by light, you mean tiki torches 

...

Still will be #47😎.  I'm sure you can find a safe space to cry and scream for the next 4 years 😏

Posted
7 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Who is "they" lol?

 

Homophobia. I guess my question is whether that even exists, since the predicate of the "phobia" would be irrationality. Thats a term subject to manipulation by the homosexual lobby and their supposed "allies" in the Left*. Is it irrational to feel disgust by the behavior of homosexuals? How about Coprophilia? Is it ok to be coprophobic?

 

How does the rational disgust over unnatural things equate to hate?

 

* I use the term "allies" because the Left cares nothing for so called "gay rights", but merely views them as a weapon to smash "bourgeois" and Judeo Christian morality. Thus, the National Socialist Movement was led by proud homosexuals until power struggles mandated that their bohemian movement be disavowed and driven back underground. Similarly, "gay" life flourished under the Bolshevik NEP until again, politics mandated suppression. The reason is patently obvious: any "organization" of individuals outside that which is permitted by Socialism is a danger to the state. I would note that in National Socialist Germany, homosexuality was illegal, as it was in Bolshevik Russia, and still is,

Lol. I answer a question you raised about a gay gene and you start ranting on about the left,  American Nazis, Bolsheviks and scatology, none of which is relevant. 

 

It's hard to take you as a serious commentator when you do that but I'll try to address your further concerns. 

 

"They" are obviously the people who conducted the studies. I would have thought that was obvious. 

 

Is it irrational to be disgusted by the behavior of homosexuality? Well it depends what they're doing I guess. 😉 Same as heterosexuals. But you being disgusted (like being offended)  is your problem, not anyone else's. 

 

How does rational disgust over unnatural things equate to hate? If you're trying to say that homosexuality is unnatural then we part company in our views. In any case nobody cares what you are disgusted by as I've said. However if that disgust and hate turn to prejudice and discrimination we do have a problem. That's the problem we sometimes see here.

 

Your last paragraph has no real relevance to the discussion.

 

Nice to talk with you. 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
6 hours ago, howlee101 said:

Still will be #47😎.  I'm sure you can find a safe space to cry and scream for the next 4 years 😏

It's the burned Trump voters that are going to be crying. I already know the magnitufe of the mistake that they made.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
5 hours ago, howlee101 said:

Ah ok. So you know the minds of almost 77 millions voters who justifiably voted for President Trump.  Amazing you can't accept the fact #47 will live rent free in your head for the next four years.  

I don't understand what he means when he says "burned Trump voters"?

 

Posted
On 11/16/2024 at 12:51 PM, FruitPudding said:

I am personally against gay marriage because if they can get married, they can then adopt children. 

What is the problem with that?

  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
On 11/16/2024 at 8:13 PM, FolkGuitar said:

You didn't mention it so I guess this guy didn't talk to you, didn't touch you,' didn't threaten you (other than your manhood,) and so was really no threat to you at all, right? Except in your mind?

Maybe he was afraid that he couldn't resist temptation.

Posted
On 11/17/2024 at 11:41 AM, Yagoda said:

The homosexual movement is rife with hate. They hate Judeo-Christian morality and hate themselves as well.

 

You should read the bible sometime, it is filled with hate.

  • Agree 1
Posted

Assorted off topic derogatory rubbish and off topic posts using overlarge fonts (cut and paste)  removed.

Posted
21 hours ago, FritsSikkink said:

What is the problem with that?

Oh please Frits I know your an old man but leave the hate behind in the past 

We must accept and love the diversity 

Posted
On 11/15/2024 at 7:27 AM, Yagoda said:

I guess with its reputation for sex and sleaze, one would expect this, but my question is, will the promotion of the Homosexual agenda HURT Thai tourism, in light of the recent rejection of that agenda in America.

 

https://www.bangkokpost.com/business/general/2902066/thailand-set-to-reap-2-billion-rainbow-tourism-boon-with-same-sex-marriage-law

 

I wonder how the Arab tourists view it, considering that such conduct is punishable by death in those nations.

 

And what pray tell is  "LGBTQQIP2SAA"? New perversions added daily?

 

 

49% vote for your hero is not a rejection or a mandate.

You know what they say about those obsessed with homosexuality?

 

I wonder how tourists from Albania, Ethiopia, Tasmania, Eritrea and Easter Island see it. But then again, who really cares?

  • Agree 1
Posted
On 11/15/2024 at 8:36 AM, Yagoda said:

True, they do have a reputation, but thats a subject beyond this topic.

You raised the point did you not?

Posted
7 hours ago, RocketDog said:

49% vote for your hero is not a rejection or a mandate.

You know what they say about those obsessed with homosexuality?

 

I wonder how tourists from Albania, Ethiopia, Tasmania, Eritrea and Easter Island see it. But then again, who really cares?

You know what they say about haters who project homosexuality on others?

Posted
On 11/23/2024 at 12:21 PM, georgegeorgia said:

Oh please Frits I know your an old man but leave the hate behind in the past 

We must accept and love the diversity 

Learn to read, I asked what HIS problem is with adoption. I don't have any issues with it.

Go mop some floors but don't sniff too much of the cleaning material.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...