Jump to content

House Panel Lacks Authority to Summon Thaksin for Inquiry


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Geoffggi said:

Who said no one is above the law, obviously they were wrong

 

The guy who's in charge of the country ?

 

  • Haha 1
Posted

Justice Ministry Uneasy Over Second Thaksin Inquiry Summons


image.jpeg

Picture courtesy: Daily News

 

The Ministry of Justice and the Department of Corrections have formally requested Wan Muhamad Noor Matha, Speaker of the House of Representatives, to resolve jurisdictional concerns regarding a second summons by the House’s Committee on National Security.

 

The inquiry focuses on former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra’s hospital stay during his incarceration.

 

At a press conference on 21 November, Somboon Muangklum, an adviser to the Justice Minister, stated that the Ministry aims to cooperate fully but questions the committee's authority.

 

He highlighted concerns over overlapping responsibilities with the Police Affairs Committee, which has already conducted investigations into Thaksin’s treatment at the Police General Hospital.

 

The Department of Corrections has expressed reservations, citing three main reasons. First, the National Security Committee's mandate, as defined by the Constitution, does not cover this matter.


Second, the issue has already been examined by the Police Affairs Committee, raising concerns about duplication of effort. Finally, independent agencies like the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) and the Ombudsman are already investigating, reducing the need for further parliamentary oversight.

 

The Justice Ministry has communicated its concerns to the Speaker and the committee, referencing legal provisions and parliamentary rules.

 

While the National Security Committee has summoned over ten officials, including the Justice Minister, for a hearing on 22 November, it remains unclear whether all will attend. Somboon indicated that attendance would be at the discretion of each individual.

 

When asked if the absence of officials might be construed as an attempt to conceal information, Somboon dismissed the notion, citing ongoing investigations by the NACC and other bodies.

 

He also denied allegations of preferential treatment for Thaksin, noting that scrutiny of his case is extensive.

 

The issue of overlapping inquiries has drawn attention to broader questions of committee jurisdiction and efficiency.

 

Somboon reiterated the Ministry’s willingness to cooperate within appropriate legal boundaries while emphasising the need for clarity in parliamentary processes, reported Daily News.

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

-- 2024-11-22

 

news-footer-2.png

 

image.png

  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Geoffggi said:

Who said no one is above the law, obviously they were wrong; this farce only goes to highlight the corruption within the elite class this sends a clear message to the common people

 

Anyone in Thailand is above the law if they have enough money/power.

We have all seen too many examples Red Bull, Prawit, Charoen Pokphand and so on.

The dinosaurs are only after Thaksin because he has the poor behind him - doesn't support the military/uber-rich.

Three of the Thaksin Clan kicked out by the military so far, and one more in the pipeline.

The military will fabricate any evidence and create any sub committee in order to remove the Thaksin dynasty.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
8 hours ago, webfact said:

A House committee investigating allegations of privileged treatment afforded to Thailand's former prime minister, Thaksin Shinawatra, during his detention at Police General Hospital in Bangkok, has been informed that it lacks the necessary authority to summon him or relevant agencies.

Teflon Thaksin rises above all, he is truly untouchable.

Posted
4 hours ago, Tropicalevo said:

 

Anyone in Thailand is above the law if they have enough money/power.

We have all seen too many examples Red Bull, Prawit, Charoen Pokphand and so on.

The dinosaurs are only after Thaksin because he has the poor behind him - doesn't support the military/uber-rich.

Three of the Thaksin Clan kicked out by the military so far, and one more in the pipeline.

The military will fabricate any evidence and create any sub committee in order to remove the Thaksin dynasty.

Time the Thaksin clan gave the country a break, they are dragging it further and further r backwards and dragging Thailand through the mire.

Thailand will never move forward while these dinosaurs keep it firmly in the past.

Clan power should be a thing of the past

 

  • Agree 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, khunjeff said:

 

I didn't realize the Dept of Corrections had jurisdiction to decide what the Parliament can and can't do.

Totally agree. They're a department of the Ministry of justice. If a parliamentary committee wants a representative from the Department of Corrections to attend to answer questions, surely they are duty bound to attend. The argument that there are other enquiries in motion is beside the point. The DoC should be made accountable at all times.

Posted
9 hours ago, webfact said:

it lacks the necessary authority to summon him or relevant agencies.

Correct. The House ministers and committees lack subpoena power. It is only under the criminal penal code that a subpoena can be issued and then only through a court order.

This questions how any House committee can develop effective legislation directed towards abuse of power, corruption or government efficiency.

  • Like 1
Posted

Every man, woman, soi dog and committee is in on the Thaksin witch-hunt hoping for a glimpse from the spot light.

 

Grow up you pathetic morons and try to spend as much time as your small intellect, I use the word intellect generously, to improve the health and prosperity of the citizens.

Posted

 Like the bit about '...duplication of effort...'. Since when have Thai Gov. depts. been worried about duplication? Next step, House Comm. orders x number of brown envelopes. If all those other depts have been/are investigating the same where are their conclusions. I mean, how long does it take to view a persons hospitalisation file?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...