1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

but much worse cases involving child rapists getting suspended sentences if they are from the "correct" Demographic. 

Are you not allowed to say which demographic?

Can you give an example where someone raped a child and was not jailed?

39 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

I'd imagine American Liberals will consider buying Chinese junk EV's instead. 

 

After all, they share the political philosophy of Xi's PRC far more than they do Musk's pro free speech anti censorship message. 

 

Musk won't care. He has shown time and time again that he cares mroe about free speech and liberty than he does making a few extra Billion. 

 

Besides, Trump might add huge tariffs to the imported Chinese EV's manufactured under terrible human rights conditions. Let's hope so. 

You nailed it again!

The progressive globalists want traditional norms thrown out the window for their new world order.

We are the world , we are the children,we are the ones who make a brighter day so you better adhere .imop

 

Tommy stands in the way , a obstacle 

in the UK & Canada! Tommy hangs on to the last threads of Traditional values,such as love of country !

 

11 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

Are you not allowed to say which demographic?

Can you give an example where someone raped a child and was not jailed?

 

https://www.deccanherald.com/world/rapist-uk-spared-jail-being-2238153

 

39 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Again Jonny, absolutely nothing to do with your transgender fixation 

 

Again Chomper, deflecting and dodging the question.

 

Why do you support self identification in some cases but refuse to in others.

 

It's a simple question. Just answer it.  

1 minute ago, JonnyF said:

 

https://www.deccanherald.com/world/rapist-uk-spared-jail-being-2238153

 

Is there only one case, you used plural?

 

1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

...Chinese junk EV's...

What is so "junk" about Chinese EVs that cannot be applied to EVs from other countries?    You have 1st hand experience of them?

6 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

Is there only one case, you used plural?

 

 

That the best you got? 😆

 

You asked for an example, I provided one.

 

There are many cases but I will not waste my day googling for you, I am not your PA. I suggest you do your own research,  you might learn something and revise your opinion. Then again...

Just now, JonnyF said:

 

That the best you got? 😆

 

You asked for an example, I provided one.

 

There are many cases but I will not waste my day googling for you, I am not your PA. I suggest you do your own research,  you might learn something and revise your opinion. Then again...

I believe you are giving false information. You said

Quote

much worse cases involving child rapists getting suspended sentences if they are from the "correct" Demographic. 

 

You missed out some important information in the ONE case you provided, perhaps deliberately. 

The sex was consensual and the judge gave reasons for not jailing the male student. 

 

If you could give the other cases, I'd appreciate it. I've searched myself but can't find any. 

1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

I have no idea bro, because I know nothing about the story.

Why do you make comments if you don't know anything about the story? 

2 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

The sex was consensual and the judge gave reasons for not jailing the male student.

 

Having sex with a minor is statutory rape.

 

Please let's not go down the route of defending this. I'll need a shower...

I am not Yaxley-Lennon's biggest fan, in fact I think he is a mindless thug/chav in many ways...

 

However, he is practicing his right to free speech and I do agree with the cause he is fighting for, I just wish that the far-right in the UK could find a stable, educated and coherent leader instead of some scallywag from Luton.

 

Someone like Enoch Powell would be perfect. If Jacob Rees-Mogg eventually defects to Reform UK once he sees the writing is on the wall for the Conservatives, then I think that could be a massive boon for them and will quite possible get them over the line at the next general election.

6 minutes ago, KhaoTakiab said:

Why do you make comments if you don't know anything about the story? 

My comments have been about my lack of knowledge, unlike those of you who expound on US politics having read nothing but the Guardian.

2 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Having sex with a minor is statutory rape.

 

Please let's not go down the route of defending this. I'll need a shower...

I'm not defending this, I'm stating the facts. Still waiting for the other cases of other rapists not being jailed for rape due to their 'certain demographic'. I suspect you didn't say Muslim for a reason.

22 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

34 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

Are you not allowed to say which demographic?

Can you give an example where someone raped a child and was not jailed?

 

https://www.deccanherald.com/world/rapist-uk-spared-jail-being-2238153

 

 

A teenager is generally not "a child", which is what he asked about.

22 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Why do you support self identification in some cases but refuse to in others.

 

It's a simple question. Just answer it.  

There's a big difference between someone using an innocuous pseudonym and a man pretending that he's a woman, or vice versa.

3 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

My comments have been about my lack of knowledge, unlike those of you who expound on US politics having read nothing but the Guardian.

Words fail me...

25 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

28 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

https://www.deccanherald.com/world/rapist-uk-spared-jail-being-2238153

 

Expand  

Is there only one case, you used plural?

It's not even a case of child rape.

3 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

It's not even a case of child rape.

He was spreading false information , inferring that many Muslims are not jailed for raping children because of the fact that they are Muslim. Total racist nonsense. The ONE case he could find involved two teenagers having consensual sex. 

14 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

18 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

The sex was consensual and the judge gave reasons for not jailing the male student.

 

Having sex with a minor is statutory rape.

How old was the teenager in that case, was she below the age of consent?

4 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

It's not even a case of child rape.

 

https://adleygray.com/what-is-statutory-rape-in-the-uk/

 

3 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

He was spreading false information , inferring that many Muslims are not jailed for raping children because of the fact that they are Muslim. Total racist nonsense. The ONE case he could find involved two teenagers having consensual sex. 

I know, I was not disagreeing with you.

7 minutes ago, KhaoTakiab said:

Words fail me...

Its to be expected when confronted with a superior intellect. Would you like me to go monosyllabic with emojis?

1 minute ago, Liverpool Lou said:

How old was the teenager in that case, was she below the age of consent?

 

Trying to justify and defend statutory rape is not really a good look Lou. 

2 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

https://adleygray.com/what-is-statutory-rape-in-the-uk/

 

In the case in question, how old was she, was she  "a child" or a teenager?   I am not disputing the statutory rape definition.

I hope the Arab prison gangs are having a good time with little Tommy in prison.

3 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

5 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

How old was the teenager in that case, was she below the age of consent?

 

Trying to justify and defend statutory rape is not really a good look Lou. 

I agree, but that is not something that I have done, I have just asked you a question about a case that you are making assertions about and that you will not answer.  That is not a good look, Jonny.

23 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

I agree, but that is not something that I have done, I have just asked you a question about a case that you are making assertions about and that you will not answer.  That is not a good look, Jonny.

I asked him a question too that he is avoiding, after inferring many Muslims were raping children and not being jailed for it, just because of their religion. He can't support this absurd accusation with links. Spreading religious hate is not a good look. 

I like Tommy Robinson and think there are far too many Muslims being allowed into the UK and they shouldn't change our laws, but to be fair they are not and shouldn't be lied about. 

1 minute ago, Neeranam said:

I asked him a question too that he is avoiding, after inferring many Muslims were raping children and not being jailed for it, just because of their religion. He can't support this absurd accusation with links. Spreading religious is not a good look. 

I'd like to give you a "Thumbs up" or a "+1" but for some reason the emoji facility does not appear on your posts for me.

Elon who?

23 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Trying to justify and defend statutory rape is not really a good look Lou. 

Unfortunately as widely reported many girls faced rape and exploitation with the perpetrators never being charged as in the Rochdale cases and others.

 

A victim of a Rochdale grooming gang has said she was raped more than 100 times from the age of 12 and felt "let down" by police.

Ruby also told BBC Newsnight police took her aborted foetus away for DNA testing without telling her.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-manchester-68300484