Neeranam Posted January 4 Posted January 4 2 minutes ago, Jingthing said: I like his technical genius. I started hating him when he accused to westerners helping with the Thai cave rescue of being pedos. I disliked him for that, but when I learned more about him, liked him again. 3 1
Neeranam Posted January 4 Posted January 4 1 hour ago, Kinok Farang said: Pathetic comment,you know very well what he means. TBh, I thought he made a mistake and meant to say Trump and Vance. Please explain why you thought pathetic?
proton Posted January 4 Posted January 4 On 1/3/2025 at 10:48 AM, Chomper Higgot said: No, it’s an online usernames, just like ‘Proton’. Nothing wrong with Tommy using another name then, or anyone else, eg some of your hero's like Lenin, Stalin,Malcolm X, Che and Pol Pot.
Chomper Higgot Posted January 4 Posted January 4 38 minutes ago, proton said: Nothing wrong with Tommy using another name then, or anyone else, eg some of your hero's like Lenin, Stalin,Malcolm X, Che and Pol Pot. Nothing wrong with me referring to his real name, the one he gives in his many criminal trials when asked under oath to state his name. 1
proton Posted January 4 Posted January 4 3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: Nothing wrong with me referring to his real name, the one he gives in his many criminal trials when asked under oath to state his name. Just a rather pointless thing to do as we all know his real name anyway 1
GarryP Posted January 4 Posted January 4 On 1/3/2025 at 11:44 AM, BarBoy said: I am not Yaxley-Lennon's biggest fan, in fact I think he is a mindless thug/chav in many ways... However, he is practicing his right to free speech and I do agree with the cause he is fighting for, I just wish that the far-right in the UK could find a stable, educated and coherent leader instead of some scallywag from Luton. Someone like Enoch Powell would be perfect. If Jacob Rees-Mogg eventually defects to Reform UK once he sees the writing is on the wall for the Conservatives, then I think that could be a massive boon for them and will quite possible get them over the line at the next general election. Tommy is not far right aka racist. He left the EDL more than 10 years ago because he believed it had become too extreme. Now he is just speaking for the working class, as the vast majority of the middle and upper class could not give an eff about what is happening to them/their daughters. There are even quite a few people with some power who ignored requests for help from the girls who were groomed, saying to the effect that the girls consented so there was nothing to look into. Girls from care homes and working class communities, some as young as 10, and an extremely large number under 16. That consititutes rape. Does he grift from his "reporting"? Of course he does. It's how he makes his living. But he does continue to try to draw attention to what is happening. Something that truly needs addressing. And now Musk has jumped on the issue which has brought great attention to this matter - not a bad thing (although I do not believe Musk is doing it out of the goodness of his heart, but rather for personal benefit - whatever that is). Rees-Mogg is pretentious tw@t and I doubt that him joining Reform would increase support for that party. 1
Captain Flack Posted January 4 Posted January 4 A flame post breaking forum rules has been removed. Discuss the topic and not publicly discuss other members or any member's personal information 1
Popular Post James105 Posted January 4 Popular Post Posted January 4 24 minutes ago, GarryP said: And now Musk has jumped on the issue which has brought great attention to this matter - not a bad thing (although I do not believe Musk is doing it out of the goodness of his heart, but rather for personal benefit - whatever that is). If I was the richest man in the world, and I discovered that a country that boasts of having the same types of freedoms that my own has was covering up the mass industrialized rape of young girls - some as young as 10 - then I would shout it from the rooftops no matter whose feathers got ruffled. Rape of children is unacceptable. Covering up the rape of children for political gain should carry the same sentence as the rapists get as this enabled tens of thousands of more young girls to be raped that could and should have been prevented. If Starmer or Phillips were involved in this cover up they should be going to jail as this is significantly worse than anything Tommy Robinsons has said or done. I don't think doing what you can to protect the rights of children not to be gang raped requires personal gain. It just requires someone to be a decent human and I am sure if you had equivalent influence you would do the same. 2 1 1
riclag Posted January 4 Posted January 4 2 hours ago, James105 said: Who voted for covering up of the rape of children by muslim pedophiles? I don't remember seeing that on the ballot paper but that is what we got. If Tommy Robinson is deserving of 18 months for contempt (a civil offence) then how long should the police/CPS/Politicians get for aiding and abetting the rape of tens of thousands of children? I don't think there is a sentence long enough personally and since we don't have the death penalty any longer I'd begrudgingly accept life without parole for every single MP, Police officer, counciller etc who knew about this and covered it up. Another Brilliant retort! Fair is fair until the other side who exposes the hypocrisy & cover up! 1 1
Will B Good Posted January 4 Posted January 4 20 hours ago, RuamRudy said: Traditional values such as beating up women, bank fraud, drug use and racism? Using a false passport, illegal entry and contempt of court.......just to add to the list......a fine upstanding role model the children of some of the fathers on here. 1
Popular Post Patong2021 Posted January 4 Popular Post Posted January 4 18 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said: Is this a joke? He literally provides conclusive supporting evidence in the form of financial documents from the council and interviews with the head teacher and parents. There is no doubt whatsoever he is on the factual side of this. You need to sit down and watch Silenced, not parrot establishment falsehoods. Have you read the court transcripts? He was unable to support any of his claims in court. The evidence that he purported to have was exposed as false and contrived. The film was based on false information. Silenced was funded by US radio host and conspiracy promoter Alex Jones who falsely claimed Sandy Hook school shooting was a hoax. Jones was bankrupted because of his false claims on Sandy Hook. He did the same think here with Lennon's lies. You have been conned, manipulated, bamboozeled, played like a fiddle. In simple language you fell for a scam. 1 2 2
Patong2021 Posted January 4 Posted January 4 Even Farage wants nothing to do with this man. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14248461/Nigel-farage-Tommy-Robinson-reform-Elon-musk-support-thug.html https://news.sky.com/story/nigel-farage-rejects-tommy-robinson-after-support-from-elon-musk-13283305 Two explicit repudiations. 1
SunnyinBangrak Posted January 4 Posted January 4 10 minutes ago, Patong2021 said: Have you read the court transcripts? He was unable to support any of his claims in court. The evidence that he purported to have was exposed as false and contrived. The film was based on false information. Silenced was funded by US radio host and conspiracy promoter Alex Jones who falsely claimed Sandy Hook school shooting was a hoax. Jones was bankrupted because of his false claims on Sandy Hook. He did the same think here with Lennon's lies. You have been conned, manipulated, bamboozeled, played like a fiddle. In simple language you fell for a scam. Again, you prove yourself totally uninformed. Im sorry, its time to sit down and watch Silenced. Warning - it will change your life. IF, and im sure you won't, but IF you watch it. Pls come back and tell us how its good in modern Britain for independant journalists(remember them?!) To be jailed for reporting on corrupt and dishonest authorities? 1 1
Popular Post Will B Good Posted January 4 Popular Post Posted January 4 1 minute ago, Patong2021 said: Even Farage wants nothing to do with this man. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14248461/Nigel-farage-Tommy-Robinson-reform-Elon-musk-support-thug.html https://news.sky.com/story/nigel-farage-rejects-tommy-robinson-after-support-from-elon-musk-13283305 Two explicit repudiations. Good heavens....TR really is a pariah now....rejected by Farage....how low can you sink? 1 2 1
Will B Good Posted January 4 Posted January 4 18 hours ago, Neeranam said: Why do you say Trump and Musk.? Musk is not going to be VP. Good point...first lady maybe....but not VP 2
Kinok Farang Posted January 4 Posted January 4 4 hours ago, Will B Good said: No. You have never lived there....so leave well alone. But he nailed it,dint he? 2 1
Nick Carter icp Posted January 4 Posted January 4 55 minutes ago, Will B Good said: Good heavens....TR really is a pariah now....rejected by Farage....how low can you sink? Farage opinies that Tommy Robinson wouldn't be beneficial in getting Reform elected . Its a professional opinion, NOT a personal one 1
Will B Good Posted January 4 Posted January 4 1 minute ago, Nick Carter icp said: Farage opinies that Tommy Robinson wouldn't be beneficial in getting Reform elected . Its a professional opinion, NOT a personal one Who said it was or might be a personal opinion?
Nick Carter icp Posted January 4 Posted January 4 1 hour ago, Will B Good said: a fine upstanding role model the children of some of the fathers on here. Is that perfect English ? 1
Will B Good Posted January 4 Posted January 4 Just now, Nick Carter icp said: Is that perfect English ? No.....you've left a gap between English and ?......keep trying, You're getting there. 1
Nick Carter icp Posted January 4 Posted January 4 1 minute ago, Will B Good said: Who said it was or might be a personal opinion? Nigel said it and I also said it, so, Me and Nigel 1
Nick Carter icp Posted January 4 Posted January 4 3 minutes ago, Will B Good said: No.....you've left a gap between English and ?......keep trying, You're getting there. You misunderstood, I was asking whether your post was understandable English . I wasn't asking you to judge my post
Will B Good Posted January 4 Posted January 4 Just now, Nick Carter icp said: You misunderstood, I was asking whether your post was understandable English . I wasn't asking you to judge my post 555
Yagoda Posted January 4 Posted January 4 4 hours ago, Jingthing said: I like his technical genius. I started hating him when he accused the western expats helping with the Thai cave rescue of being pedos. He's basically insane. Being a technical genius has nothing to do with being qualified to run government or boss around the world. He needs to be stopped before he does irreparable damage. He believes women are women and men are men and you can't change biology, that's why you hate him 1 2
Kinok Farang Posted January 4 Posted January 4 3 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said: Nigel said it and I also said it, so, Me and Nigel Shouldn't that be "Nigel and I"? 2
baansgr Posted January 4 Posted January 4 On 1/3/2025 at 9:46 AM, Patong2021 said: No. Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon, the multiple convicted criminal is in jail for contempt of court and for violating a court injunction. It was not an isolated event. He violated the injunction 10X, each time being warned to stop. Actions have consequences and a multiple convicted violent criminal cannot expect to thumb his nose at a court and get away with it. In 2021, he was bullying a 15 year old child and was found guilty of libel in that case with a £100,000 judgement plus legal costs. He was ordered. to stop his libel and chose not to. Yaxley Lennon forced the court to act. When jailing Yaxley-Lennon for 18 months, Mr Justice Johnson said: “In a democratic society underpinned by the rule of law, court orders must be obeyed.“Nobody is above the law. Nobody can pick or choose which laws or which injunctions they obey, or which they do not.“Even if they believe that an injunction is... contrary to their views they must comply with the injunction. “They are not entitled to set themselves up as the judge in their own court. Otherwise the administration of justice and rule of law would break down.” Multiple convictions for mortgage fraud...everyone and their Mother was doing self cert mortgages.... contempt of court for telling and showing the truth...it's fascist Nazis like you that have messed up the UK..go crawl under your lefty nazi rock 3 1
Popular Post Patong2021 Posted January 4 Popular Post Posted January 4 1 hour ago, baansgr said: Multiple convictions for mortgage fraud...everyone and their Mother was doing self cert mortgages.... contempt of court for telling and showing the truth...it's fascist Nazis like you that have messed up the UK..go crawl under your lefty nazi rock He pleaded guilty to two counts of conspiring with others to obtain a mortgage by misrepresentation from the Abbey and Halifax banks. The fact of the matter is that he committed criminal fraud and it was for personal profit. You are excusing his criminal fraud. And once again, you are assuming he told and showed the truth. Have your read the trial transcript. His claims were exposed as fabrications, as lies. He is nothing but a n instigator , a football hooligan lowlife. It is rather incredible that you call me a fascist nazi and then tell me to go and crawl udner a left nazi rock, all because I believe in upholding the law. You have been played. He conned you and you are looking for an excuse to justify your own bias. The man is common street scum who was caught lying. 1 2 2
Popular Post Patong2021 Posted January 4 Popular Post Posted January 4 6 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said: Again, you prove yourself totally uninformed. Im sorry, its time to sit down and watch Silenced. Warning - it will change your life. IF, and im sure you won't, but IF you watch it. Pls come back and tell us how its good in modern Britain for independant journalists(remember them?!) To be jailed for reporting on corrupt and dishonest authorities? Like anyone who has been conned in a Ponzi scheme, you can't believe it until you lose your money. Silenced is BS. It is not reliable. You want to believe a film put out by bankrupt conspiracy promoter Alex Jones. Fine, but at least be honest and admit to the fact that the allegations made were not proven and were in fact shown to be fabricated. Tommy could not support his claims in court. He had no reliable evidence. Everything was an invention. 1 1 1
Popular Post SunnyinBangrak Posted January 4 Popular Post Posted January 4 5 minutes ago, Patong2021 said: Like anyone who has been conned in a Ponzi scheme, you can't believe it until you lose your money. Silenced is BS. It is not reliable. You want to believe a film put out by bankrupt conspiracy promoter Alex Jones. Fine, but at least be honest and admit to the fact that the allegations made were not proven and were in fact shown to be fabricated. Tommy could not support his claims in court. He had no reliable evidence. Everything was an invention. Ok were done here. You refuse to educate yourself by watching the movie and keep parotting the establishment lies. His evidence is 100% complete and undeniable, to anyone that looks. Good day to you. 1 2 3
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now