File photo for reference only

 

Northeastern Thailand faces a pressing blood shortage, with officials from Regional Blood Centre V urging residents to donate in response to hospitals receiving only 30-40% of their required blood supply. Nakhon Ratchasima's 39 hospitals are heavily reliant on the centre, which traditionally expects requests for up to 15,000 units monthly. Currently, they hold a mere 3,000 units, marking an alarming 80% deficit.

 

Sirilak Piakkhunthod, head of the blood centre, highlighted key issues contributing to the shortage. Regular donation occurs infrequently, with many donating just once a year instead of every three months. Furthermore, a decline in new donors persists, hindered by health issues such as thalassemia and iron deficiency anaemia.

 

 

Sirilak strongly appeals to the public, particularly those 17 and older, to recognise the critical need for regular contributions, emphasising the crucial role of awareness campaigns. She stated, “We shouldn’t wait for the perfect moment to donate blood, as declining health might mean missing the chance to do so forever.”

 

Residents prepared to help can visit the Regional Blood Centre V in Nakhon Ratchasima, or use donation sites at Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University and Terminal 21 Korat shopping mall. Immediate action is essential to stabilise the supply and support the region's healthcare needs.

 

-- 2025-01-16

 

 

Knowing that the toxic spike protein from the mRNA Covid-jabs can remain for years or even indefinitely in the vaxxed, makes me unwilling to receive a blood transfusion from a Blood-bank.  The Red Cross and other blood-bank centers did NOT keep track of whether the donors were vaxed or unvaxxed but simply added the donated blood in the right category (O, A, B, AB / pos-neg).  So apart from the shortage all the available blood in bloodbanks applying that procedure is contaminated.

Obviously, "fact-checkers" deem the above as 'misleading', but note that they do NOT mark it false, only that it is 'extremely unlikely' and that there is 'no evidence of risk'.

See link > https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.344238J 

 

1 minute ago, Red Phoenix said:

Knowing that the toxic spike protein from the mRNA Covid-jabs can remain for years or even indefinitely in the vaxxed, makes me unwilling to receive a blood transfusion from a Blood-bank.  The Red Cross and other blood-bank centers did NOT keep track of whether the donors were vaxed or unvaxxed but simply added the donated blood in the right category (O, A, B, AB / pos-neg).  So apart from the shortage all the available blood in bloodbanks applying that procedure is contaminated.

Obviously, "fact-checkers" deem the above as 'misleading', but note that they do NOT mark it false, only that it is 'extremely unlikely' and that there is 'no evidence of risk'.

See link > https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.344238J 

 

 

And even if it was tainted what's the problem? 

16 minutes ago, Celsius said:

 

And even if it was tainted what's the problem? 

Contaminated blood is not a good thing to have flowing round your body. Can maim and kill.

4 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Contaminated blood is not a good thing to have flowing round your body. Can maim and kill.

 

Blood banks test for this. Not sure about Thailand 

4 minutes ago, Celsius said:

 

Blood banks test for this. Not sure about Thailand 

Then read the Fact-check article > https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.344238J 

which clearly states that blood banks do NOT test for 'this'.

'This' being the toxic spike protein that has been found circulating in the blood of the jabbed +800 days after their last shot. 

15 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

has been found circulating in the blood of the jabbed +800 days after their last shot. 

 

Wow. It looks like I am safe from covid 800 days after being vaxxed

 

 

Blood transfusions are important; however, it is a personal choice.

I tried to give blood here and was told I am too old.

29 minutes ago, Celsius said:

Wow. It looks like I am safe from covid 800 days after being vaxxed

 

Nope, your immune system will be confused and severely weakened by the continual release of those toxic spike-proteins that the mRNA jab instructed your cells to produce.  And when a new variant of covid-19 comes your already weakened immune system will not be primed to fight that one. 

Look up the difference between vaccine-induced immunity and natural immunity, Vaccine-induced immunity is extremely selective, and that's why they are recommending you to take boosters (to fight the 'current' variant, which of course has already disappeared by the time you get the shot).  Compare that with natural immunity (as a result of your immune system having successfully fought of an infection) which is very broad and will also recognize new variants of Covid and use its 'memory' to eradicate it.

4 hours ago, bkk6060 said:

I tried to give blood here and was told I am too old.

Not to fret Sir.

 

In a couple of years the people that stayed away from the mRNA miracle jabs will be able to sell their sperm for an absolute fortune. There's gonna be sperm millionaires walking among us.

 

Age not a problem.

16 hours ago, bkk6060 said:

I tried to give blood here and was told I am too old.

they seem to be "not serious" about getting donors 

there is absolutely no reason to be rejected because of age

I also tried and got sent packing

first time donors in Thailand have a cut off at 60 years old

 and if you are a regular donor they cap it at 70

 

On 1/17/2025 at 12:18 PM, Red Phoenix said:

Knowing that the toxic spike protein from the mRNA Covid-jabs can remain for years or even indefinitely in the vaxxed, makes me unwilling to receive a blood transfusion from a Blood-bank.  The Red Cross and other blood-bank centers did NOT keep track of whether the donors were vaxed or unvaxxed but simply added the donated blood in the right category (O, A, B, AB / pos-neg).  So apart from the shortage all the available blood in bloodbanks applying that procedure is contaminated.

Obviously, "fact-checkers" deem the above as 'misleading', but note that they do NOT mark it false, only that it is 'extremely unlikely' and that there is 'no evidence of risk'.

See link > https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.344238J 

 

Hahaha ...., if you need it, no one will ask you, you want it or not!!!

6 minutes ago, snowgard said:

Hahaha ...., if you need it, no one will ask you, you want it or not!!!

 

Better educate yourself before posting nonsense statements.

When you are scheduled for non-immediate surgery, there are several options.

You can stipulate that in case of need your own blood is to be used and not any from the blood-bank. 

You can also have your own blood or those of unvaxxed friends/relatives with same blood-group tapped before surgery takes place.

Only in case of accident where you urgently need blood, you will have no choice and will be administered what is available.

 

= = =

Your comment is just STUPID!!! Most people who need blood are in emergencies. What do you do if you have an accident and are in a coma?

Good luck!!! 😉

On 1/17/2025 at 12:18 PM, Red Phoenix said:

Knowing that the toxic spike protein from the mRNA Covid-jabs can remain for years or even indefinitely in the vaxxed, makes me unwilling to receive a blood transfusion from a Blood-bank.  The Red Cross and other blood-bank centers did NOT keep track of whether the donors were vaxed or unvaxxed but simply added the donated blood in the right category (O, A, B, AB / pos-neg).  So apart from the shortage all the available blood in bloodbanks applying that procedure is contaminated.

Obviously, "fact-checkers" deem the above as 'misleading', but note that they do NOT mark it false, only that it is 'extremely unlikely' and that there is 'no evidence of risk'.

See link > https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.344238J 

 

 

Perhaps I should charge for my A+ non-infected no mRNA blood.  My son's is the same.

 

23 minutes ago, snowgard said:

Your comment is just STUPID!!! Most people who need blood are in emergencies. What do you do if you have an accident and are in a coma?

Good luck!!! 😉

 

Your statement that 'most people who need blood are in emergencies' is wrong.

When looking at the number of cases, non-urgent surgeries requiring blood transfusion are far more frequent overall than trauma cases requiring blood.

On 1/18/2025 at 2:09 PM, Red Phoenix said:

 

Your statement that 'most people who need blood are in emergencies' is wrong.

When looking at the number of cases, non-urgent surgeries requiring blood transfusion are far more frequent overall than trauma cases requiring blood.

 

The factual statement I made that non-urgent surgeries requiring blood transfusion are far more frequent overall than trauma cases requiring blood, can be easily checked. I actually queried Chat GPT about it which confirmed that that is fully correct.

The poster from the 'laughing emoji' is probably laughing away his fears about the matter that the large majority of blood in blood-banks has not been tested for the toxic spike-protein and is now contaminated as they stupidly mixed the blood of mRNA vaxxed and unvaxxed donors.