Jump to content

Thailand Moves Closer to Wealth Tax with New Asset Tracking


Recommended Posts

Posted

clever idea , but clever wealthy Thais ( or other nationals) , you  not able, if they held assets in offshore companys instead of individual holders.

even developed countrys are nearly not able to  find them, or they just simply change their " homeadress" to a tax free country like malaysis or dubai or many other couuntrys (overseas income tax free)

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, ozz1 said:

I can't see this happening too many elites will block it somehow including politicians

 

Probably not but if, then the Shinawatra family are in for a real shock.

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, ozz1 said:

I can't see this happening too many elites will block it somehow including politicians

 

....or just leave, and take their money with them.

  • Like 2
Posted

So they can get some income information.

 

So this can tell about some wealth but a lot of wealth does not produce income so it would not be flagged.

 

The terminology is getting the dialog confusing and misleading.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

AKA the new system where you own nothing but are happy with a Universal Basic Income that is minimal, and if you then work on top you get some more against lower tax rates.

 

In reality you lose on growth potential, power, privacy and more while the real elites will just stay exempted and remain in control of the big plays. The gates are slowly closing...

 

Guess in 5 years it is just normal to all be paying 15-20% minimum for those still here by then. I could see Cambodia getting more populair and not enforcing such things for years until their GDP is big enough.

Posted
6 hours ago, webfact said:

One pivotal goal of taxation, he argued, is to ameliorate income disparities between high and low earners.

 

This is a profound statement.

 

It confirms that wealth redistribution is now official government policy, and thus that Thailand is now on the globalist socialist path. Some will think this is a positive development, some will think it's a negative one. But it is significant regardless.

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Posted

One day it will all happen and Thailand will begin to look like a modern democracy.

 

But probably not in our lifetimes.

Posted
55 minutes ago, tai4de2 said:

 

This is a profound statement.

 

It confirms that wealth redistribution is now official government policy, and thus that Thailand is now on the globalist socialist path. Some will think this is a positive development, some will think it's a negative one. But it is significant regardless.

Taksin has been proposing a negative tax system int Thailand in which those below a certain level will get extra money from the rich to compensate and make them more equal.

https://aseannow.com/topic/1336853-taksin-proposes-negative-income-tax-to-combat-poverty-in-thailand-short/

  • Like 1
Posted

Posters are focussing on the financials of this thread.

Part of the headline is about Assets held in foreign countries.

How many Thais have houses in places like London and Dubai?

These are not so easy to hide or move around as cash.

 

  • Confused 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, Muhendis said:

Posters are focussing on the financials of this thread.

Part of the headline is about Assets held in foreign countries.

How many Thais have houses in places like London and Dubai?

These are not so easy to hide or move around as cash.

 

 

Well Tony and his daughter and sister will be first on the wealth confiscation list...With their houses and Dubai and London...

 

But then again a very strong possibility....They will conveniently overlooked........Like with Tonys stock sale non-tax......

Posted
7 hours ago, webfact said:

“In the past, implementing such a tax was challenging because the very wealthy could manage their assets globally. The wealthy can invest worldwide, and we have never been able to track their assets held abroad,” Lavaron noted.

And never will... the elites will make sure of that.

Posted
3 hours ago, Dante99 said:

So they can get some income information.

 

So this can tell about some wealth but a lot of wealth does not produce income so it would not be flagged.

 

The terminology is getting the dialog confusing and misleading.

 

Agree - the story starts out talking about getting data on "income" and "earnings", and then says that will lead to a tax on "wealth". I don't know whether the speaker wasn't clear in his presentation, or the reporter didn't explain it clearly, but I'm not following this at all.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...