Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
29 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Guess who’d going to receive the $500Billion, it’s the same people who will control the AI and it ain’t going to be for the benefit of any of these poor people you so obviously despise.

 

Rather embarrassing for Starmer this one as he made this big announcement about the UK becoming an "AI Superpower to boost growth" a mere week ago.  The moron fails to realize that AI requires data centers - lot's of them, and data centers consume power - lot's of it, and the UK has the highest energy costs on the planet due to net zero insanity and offshoring the energy to other countries to tick a virtue signalling box.  

 

The Labour government seem to be completely devoid of any intelligence, artificial or otherwise.  

  • Confused 3
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, WorriedNoodle said:

 

This perspective sounds like it’s coming from a pretty narrow view of British politics.  "Gammons" comes to mind. Typically portrayed as men (though not exclusively) with flushed faces, bald heads, and England flags draped everywhere, often driving white vans they need for their side jobs. A badge of honor for a lack of sophistication and nationalist fervor.

 

Hate to disappoint you Noods, but I am far from bald, and I drive a Hybrid sedan (it is white though).

 

But enough about me (and your lazy stereotypes), Starmer remains a lying simp while Trump remains a legend. Many Brits would love such a charismatic leader with common sense policies, that loves his country. 

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, bkk6060 said:

Sure,  I bet if they actually took a vote to secede to the USA, British would vote for that unanimously. 

No they wouldn't.

  • Agree 1
Posted

I wish Starmer or any UK Politician had the guts to act swiftly on their pre electlon manifest. 

Trump acted within hours.  in comparison Starmer's  election promises are after Six months just talk. 

 Any UK politician with Trump,'s resolve on illegal immigration will win a similar election by a landslide and win the popular vote. 

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Will B Good said:

 

It is, to be fair, an excellent example of how the hard of thinking can easily be swayed.

 

Why aren't the Brits going to land on Mars?

 

Britons looking on with a mix of awe and envy.......really?

 

.........left some British onlookers wishing for a similar figure who would unapologetically place their country’s needs first......... Just what the Brits want?....the likes of Farage signing executive orders and issuing them like confetti.....no thanks.

 

As articles go in the Telegraph, this has to be one of the most atrocious I have ever read......if I didn't know better I would have said riclag had written it with the help of Musk.

We need Paul Golding , Britain First , the rest are just bs.

  • Haha 2
Posted
3 hours ago, newbee2022 said:

Any evidence that an elected PM hates his country ??? Probably you made this remark about Sir Starmer??

 

The massive foreign aid budget?

 

Saying he prefers Davos to Parliament?

 

Freezing the pensioners?

 

Treating illegal immigrants with kid gloves?

 

Screwing the farmers?

 

Good enough? Or are you expecting a signed document "I, 2 Tier Keir do hereby declare that I detest Britain, especially the working class" with an official government stamp and certificate of authenticity?

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

The massive foreign aid budget?

 

Saying he prefers Davos to Parliament?

 

Freezing the pensioners?

 

Treating illegal immigrants with kid gloves?

 

Screwing the farmers?

 

Good enough? Or are you expecting a signed document "I, 2 Tier Keir do hereby declare that I detest Britain, especially the working class" with an official government stamp and certificate of authenticity?

That's a lot of nonsense .

Obviously you're a Facebook fan and believe what you can read.

"Last year, in a gift to conspiracy theorists everywhere, Sir Keir Starmer revealed he preferred the World Economic Forum to parliament. “Once you get out of Westminster, whether it’s to Davos or anywhere else,” he said, “you actually engage with people that you can see yourself working with in the future. Westminster is just a tribal shouting place.”

All other points ate wrong or not new.

Enjoy Facebook🤣. Good bye 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, newbee2022 said:

That's a lot of nonsense .

Obviously you're a Facebook fan and believe what you can read.

"Last year, in a gift to conspiracy theorists everywhere, Sir Keir Starmer revealed he preferred the World Economic Forum to parliament. “Once you get out of Westminster, whether it’s to Davos or anywhere else,” he said, “you actually engage with people that you can see yourself working with in the future. Westminster is just a tribal shouting place.”

All other points ate wrong or not new.

Enjoy Facebook🤣. Good bye 

 

In other words, everyone agrees with his globalist agenda in Davos. 

 

Unlike Parliament, where his lies and deceit are called out (except when they are silenced to "protect the integrity of the trial"). 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Theforgotten1 said:

We need Paul Golding , Britain First , the rest are just bs.

Who is "we"?

 

If the UK really "needed" Paul Golding and Britain First, please explain firstly how many seats the party won at the last election in the UK, and secondly. why are they are not in power and running the UK at the moment?

 

https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-10009/

 

2024 election results 

 

Of 650 available seats across the UK, The Britain First party won the grand total of Zero.

 

Could it be that the UK voting public don't agree with you.

 

I certainly don't.

  • Sad 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Nah.

He cares about his billionaire oligarchs.

He thinks his core base are trash. 

He would never actually hang out with such people.

 

The message was quite clear when they fled indoors because of some inclement weather and let their acolytes freeze outside.

 

I learnt leading from the front. But from cowards like that you can't expect even any attempt to hide their deep contempt for the dolts they've duped.

  • Confused 1
Posted
15 hours ago, Social Media said:

 

 

Tina, one respondent, went as far as expressing hope that Trump might label the Labour Party as a terrorist organization,

Exactly!

They want to help the Middle Class worker, not the world's richest people.

Can't have that.

SPOILER ALERT: The person who said this still isn't rich only greedy🤑 

Posted
8 hours ago, PJ71 said:

Correct, and he has a set ( and a fit wife ).

A wife whose nude pictures Putin posts all over the internet .

  • Sad 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
11 hours ago, James105 said:

A guy on Question time recently summed it up quite well. 

 

With Trump America has hit the ground running.  With Starmer the UK has hit the ground.    

Yes, truer words never spoken!!

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Smokey and the Bandit said:

Huffpost, well there's a non biased editorial for you??? Right up there with Salon, the new republic and maybe CNN??:cheesy:

Don't forget the BBC!!

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, illisdean said:

Adjudicated rapist....Trump? Totally false, a total lie perpetrated by a liar. Trump was NEVER convicted of rape. You are a total liar and fraud for trying to convince people of your lies. You have court docs attesting to your blatant lies?

 

Show some proof of your lies and disinformation or forever be branded the lying fraud you have proven to be. Your call.

 

AIadjudicatedrapist.thumb.jpg.af5f0d1fe0b9ca379da2998fd8e0d864.jpg

 

Ejeancarroljuryverdict.thumb.jpg.3d58c5f5964a28ea7fe4a7920aa79089.jpg

 

Absolutely, some people just can't except facts and state falsehoods, its very sad!! It's not the first time either!

  • Love It 1
Posted
10 hours ago, bkk6060 said:

Sure,  I bet if they actually took a vote to secede to the USA, British would vote for that unanimously. 

Secede means withdraw from. You can't secede to something. The U.K. cannot secede from anything, although each member country could theoretically cede from the Union, subject to a change in the constitution. Perhaps you mean succumb. 🙂 

Posted

How did building the wall go ? Didn't get very far with that did he.

 

It's a bluster and nonsense. They walk a hard game on immigration, then musk and co start coming out saying 'oh we need immigration for our business' - it's just nonsense. 

Posted
11 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Nah.

He cares about his billionaire oligarchs.

He thinks his core base are trash. 

He would never actually hang out with such people.

Then why is he closing the border? 

 

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, DonniePeverley said:

How did building the wall go ? Didn't get very far with that did he.

 

It's a bluster and nonsense. They walk a hard game on immigration, then musk and co start coming out saying 'oh we need immigration for our business' - it's just nonsense. 

He got 500 miles done, and the left fought ecery inch. 

 

And his “Remain in Mexico” policy paid for it. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...