Jump to content

Trump Admin Targets UK Leadership as Keir Starmer Becomes the New Political Adversary


Recommended Posts

Posted

image.png

 

The Trump administration’s attitude towards the UK’s leadership under Prime Minister Keir Starmer has taken a distinctly antagonistic turn. During Donald Trump’s inauguration celebrations in Washington, DC, it became evident that the once-vaunted “special relationship” between the US and the UK had shifted into deep hostility from Trump’s circle towards the Labour government. 

 

At a pre-inauguration event dubbed the "Stars and Stripes Union Jack" party, Nigel Farage addressed an audience of Trump supporters, right-wing British figures, and media representatives. Farage expressed optimism about winning the next UK general election, adding, “I just hope it happens while Donald Trump is still president.” While Trump’s current term runs until 2028—before Starmer is required to call the next UK election—the remark appeared to carry an undertone of coordination or shared political strategy between Farage and Trump’s allies.

 

What became glaringly apparent to anyone engaging with Trump’s team was their outright disdain for Starmer and his government. From junior staffers to senior advisers, the rhetoric was unfiltered. Keir Starmer was branded with terms such as "Marxist," "communist," "authoritarian," and even a "CCP puppet." The disdain was not only for Starmer’s policies but also for what his leadership symbolized. This antipathy seemed to grow as Starmer filled the void left by Canada’s Justin Trudeau, a long-time target of Trump’s ire, following Trudeau’s departure from the political spotlight.

 

One notable incident that cemented this hostility was a dinner meeting between Trump, Starmer, and Foreign Secretary David Lammy in New York. Despite initial goodwill, the relationship soured after Labour sent 100 activists to campaign for Kamala Harris during the US election. A Trump insider remarked, “Starmer, Lammy, and Trump sat down for that dinner... but Starmer’s actions after undid any goodwill he may have had.”

 

Further grievances stem from perceptions of Starmer’s government. The handling of race riots after the Southport murders, perceived as stifling free speech, and allegations of “cover-ups” involving child grooming gangs have elicited condemnation from Trump’s circle. “Nobody believed such a thing could happen in Britain,” said a senior Trump adviser regarding the grooming gang allegations. This narrative has been used to portray Britain as a nation in decline.

 

Trump’s hostility has manifested in direct diplomatic actions. From threatening tariffs and rejecting trade deal terms to vetoing the Chagos Islands agreement, the US administration appears intent on undermining Starmer’s government. The situation escalated further with suggestions that Trump might reject Lord Mandelson’s credentials as UK ambassador.

 

Discussions among Trump’s allies have even floated the concept of “regime change” in the UK. While such musings overlook the realities of the British parliamentary system and Starmer’s firm majority, they reflect the administration’s desire to see a leader more aligned with Trump’s ideals in Downing Street. Some view Farage as the ideal candidate for this role, although doubts about his political viability persist, even within Trump’s circle.

 

The Trump administration’s stance signals a contentious period for US-UK relations, with ideological clashes threatening to overshadow traditional alliances. Whether this dynamic evolves into a more collaborative relationship remains uncertain, but for now, Keir Starmer stands as a prominent figure of opposition for Trump’s America.

 

Based on a report by The Independent 2025-01-27

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

 

image.png

  • Haha 1
Posted

This article has been overtaken, to an extent, by Trump saying he thinks Starmer is doing a good job. However, this could just be a softening-up tactic by Trump prior to tough trade negotiations.

  • Thanks 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

True British patriots will know how to respond to this foreign interference in British politics.

 

’Will of the people’, ‘voters have spoken’, ‘a fan of democracy’ and all that.

Declare war on Trump. Heil Starmer.

Is that your solution?🤗

  • Confused 3
Posted
1 hour ago, newbee2022 said:

Heil Starmer.

I thought that 'Heil' was an accolade for someone slightly right of centre?  Perhaps Komrade Keir?

 

By the way, I'm neither for nor against Starmer, not sure I'm too 'for' any politician right now.

  • Agree 1
Posted
59 minutes ago, Ulyssesamui said:

You believe the Bolshevik Broadcasting Company (BBC)?

 

I thought that they were the British Brainwashing Corperation...

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 2
  • Love It 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, zyphodb said:

 

I thought that they were the British Brainwashing Corperation...

I'll maybe try to come up with something for FOX & MSNBC later.😂

  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
Just now, bradiston said:

How do you mean, "it was still not Trump"?

Did you read the original OP? It was about Trump's admin, not Trump. people like Musk etc

Posted
3 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Did you read the original OP? It was about Trump's admin, not Trump. people like Musk etc

Of course, I was forgetting that Trump has no say in what his army of spokesmen aka administration, says. Keep spinning.

Posted
1 minute ago, bradiston said:

Of course, I was forgetting that Trump has no say in what his army of spokesmen aka administration, says. Keep spinning.

Spinning what? it does state it quite clearly:

 

 

3 hours ago, Social Media said:

Meanwhile, Trump ally and tech billionaire Elon Musk has taken a contrasting stance in line with many of Trump's administration, being strongly critical of Sir Keir and repeatedly calling for his removal from office. Despite Musk’s criticism, Trump’s remarks underscore a cordial relationship between the US and UK leaders, even amid differences in political philosophy.

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Kinok Farang said:

Guilty I'm afraid.

 

3 hours ago, Social Media said:

Trump described Sir Keir as having done "a very good job thus far" and noted that the two share "a very good relationship."  

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Spinning what? it does state it quite clearly:

 

 

 

Yes, in the update it does. I commented on the original, which was from a  "based on" - what does that actually mean?) - report in the Independent. The update isn't credited, although it appears to be  from the same article I linked to.

 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...