Trump Set to Issue Executive Order Banning Transgender Athletes from Female Sports

[jippytum]

 love Trump or hate him this is a common sense order that should be applauded by fair mlnded sports lovers worldwide. 

[cjinchiangrai]

Just now, jippytum said:

 love Trump or hate him this is a common sense order that should be applauded by fair mlnded sports lovers worldwide. 

It is a TV stunt promoted by a bigoted criminal.

[jippytum]

6 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

It is a TV stunt promoted by a bigoted criminal.

rubbish. banning these cheats from sports is long overdue. 

[Nick Carter icp]

8 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

It is a TV stunt promoted by a bigoted criminal.

 

   Do you favour men playing against  Women in sports ?

Do you disagree with Donald on this issue ?

[cjinchiangrai]

10 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   Do you favour men playing against  Women in sports ?

Do you disagree with Donald on this issue ?

As previously stated, there need to be rules, however, a presidential edict is not legal or appropriate.

[Nick Carter icp]

Just now, cjinchiangrai said:

As previously stated, there need to be rules, however, a presidential edict is not legal or appropriate.

 

   But you agree with Donalds opinion on this issue ?

[Sir Dude]

On this one I completely agree with Trump and it's awful what has been allowed to happen to women's rights regarding this... a no-brainer really. Just as things were getting better for women in general, along comes a bunch of aggressive men wearing dresses with pink hair demanding to use the same toilets as underage girls, humiliate real women in sports, act violently toward anyone who disagrees and those holding the power in society and institutions just shrug their shoulders and let it happen... ludicrous and criminal really.

[frank83628]

9 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

As previously stated, there need to be rules, however, a presidential edict is not legal or appropriate.

You just don't lihe it because has done it 

[cjinchiangrai]

5 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   But you agree with Donalds opinion on this issue ?

No, like everything he does, there is no nuance and a great deal of grandstanding bigotry. An arbitrary ban is not the answer, nor is a lasse-faire approach. The sports need to be addressed based on the requirements of the activity, The stage of transitioning must also be considered.

[cjinchiangrai]

1 minute ago, frank83628 said:

You just don't lihe it because has done it 

No, but it is still illegal. The President has no business making such a proclamation.

[thesetat]

5 hours ago, HappyExpat57 said:

Do you really think he gives a sh!t about working within the rule of law?

 

There are three branches of US gubmint - executive, legislative, judicial. The legislative branch has been infiltrated by Republicans shaking in their boots for fear of upsetting president Musk or the other court jester, rendering them less than useless. The judicial branch can wag their fingers all they want and scream from the mountain tops that Musk is operating illegally and must stop. However, the judicial branch has no army backing them up. Both Musk and the court jester can say, "Oh yeah? Try and MAKE us stop."

HEhe you definitely have some issues you need to sort out... Quite funny though your post. 

[thesetat]

16 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

No, like everything he does, there is no nuance and a great deal of grandstanding bigotry. An arbitrary ban is not the answer, nor is a lasse-faire approach. The sports need to be addressed based on the requirements of the activity, The stage of transitioning must also be considered.

The way things have been happening. Especially with Biden and the Dems stepping up using wokeism to appease the Trans. Trump had no choice but to choose a side and make the ban. 

Quick and effective and now everyone is falling into place with him on this. There has been no grandstanding. A few news articles about it only and most of those were favoring Trumps actions. 

Schools no longer need to worry about lawsuits from some girl who claims a Trans entered the girls room and was showing his pecker to her. As well as other businesses. Government programs no longer need to sort out which pronouns to use haha....

 

[frank83628]

21 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

No, like everything he does, there is no nuance and a great deal of grandstanding bigotry. An arbitrary ban is not the answer, nor is a lasse-faire approach. The sports need to be addressed based on the requirements of the activity, The stage of transitioning must also be considered.

No it should not, men=men, woman=women, its a simple fact. not been an issue until the woke mob infested the political world. 

[cjinchiangrai]

1 minute ago, frank83628 said:

No it should not, men=men, woman=women, its a simple fact. not been an issue until the woke mob infested the political world. 

It is far from fact if you have made it past the eighth grade.

[cjinchiangrai]

8 minutes ago, thesetat said:

The way things have been happening. Especially with Biden and the Dems stepping up using wokeism to appease the Trans. Trump had no choice but to choose a side and make the ban. 

Quick and effective and now everyone is falling into place with him on this. There has been no grandstanding. A few news articles about it only and most of those were favoring Trumps actions. 

Schools no longer need to worry about lawsuits from some girl who claims a Trans entered the girls room and was showing his pecker to her. As well as other businesses. Government programs no longer need to sort out which pronouns to use haha....

 

That makes zero sense. Why would a politician pander to a group that is such an insignificant percentage of the electorate? 

 

The Federal Government has no standing to make a ruling on State run activities or privately run organizations. Trumps edict is meaningless.

[Celsius]

I am scared all of them will be moving to Canada alomg with criminal element that is facing deportation.

[Nick Carter icp]

28 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

No, like everything he does, there is no nuance and a great deal of grandstanding bigotry. An arbitrary ban is not the answer, nor is a lasse-faire approach. The sports need to be addressed based on the requirements of the activity, The stage of transitioning must also be considered.

 

   I do disagree .

People are either Male or Female and they can play in those sports.

Those people who do not fit into either category cannot play that sport .

   If you are neither Male or Female, then you cannot play 

[cjinchiangrai]

1 minute ago, Celsius said:

I am scared all of them will be moving to Canada alomg with criminal element that is facing deportation.

Trans people can go where they like. Criminals are a minor percentage of immigrants, but trans people are not criminals.

[WDSmart]

10 hours ago, save the frogs said:

To all the Trump haters .... don't tell me you think this is a bad decision? 

 

I am a Trump-hater, and I think this decision is discriminatory. It is described as only barring "...transgender girls and women from participating in female sports." What about transgender boys and men from participating in male sports? Why the gender discrimination?

[thesetat]

11 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

That makes zero sense. Why would a politician pander to a group that is such an insignificant percentage of the electorate? 

 

The Federal Government has no standing to make a ruling on State run activities or privately run organizations. Trumps edict is meaningless.

He can do so simply because failure to comply will cause the Feds to reduce funding that state. The same happened when they tried to change the national speed limit. Some states chose to do it and some did not. They are not forced to comply but can lose money from the government if they do not

[cjinchiangrai]

6 minutes ago, thesetat said:

He can do so simply because failure to comply will cause the Feds to reduce funding that state. The same happened when they tried to change the national speed limit. Some states chose to do it and some did not. They are not forced to comply but can lose money from the government if they do not

That is also illegal.

[thesetat]

3 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

That is also illegal.

No, it is not illegal to take away monies to a State for not adhering to Federal policies. 

From chatgpt

Yes, the federal government can withhold or withdraw funding from states that do not comply with federal guidelines. This practice is often used as a means of enforcing federal policies, especially in areas like education, transportation, and health care. However, there are legal limits to this power, and the conditions attached to federal funding must be clearly stated and related to the federal interest in the particular program or project.

[cjinchiangrai]

6 minutes ago, thesetat said:

No, it is not illegal to take away monies to a State for not adhering to Federal policies. 

From chatgpt

Yes, the federal government can withhold or withdraw funding from states that do not comply with federal guidelines. This practice is often used as a means of enforcing federal policies, especially in areas like education, transportation, and health care. However, there are legal limits to this power, and the conditions attached to federal funding must be clearly stated and related to the federal interest in the particular program or project.

It is illegal without authorization of Congress.

[HappyExpat57]

1 hour ago, thesetat said:

HEhe you definitely have some issues you need to sort out... Quite funny though your post. 

And your glaring ignorance is being shouted from the mountain tops with crap like this.

 

It's ALWAYS the same with MAGAts - ignore the facts and make stoopid [sic] remarks.

 

[The Old Bull]

The sad thing is this madness was not stopped sooner ,had to go all the way to the top .

[freedomnow]

8 hours ago, rocketboy2 said:

 

Think they keep the sausage, but it gets hollowed out.

and inverted, to make some kind of vagina.

So when they have sex with a man, his is putting his penis inside another penis. 

You seem very familiar with this operation ?

Inside track ?