The reason why the airline may want to see a return ticket within 60 days is because being granted a 30-day extension, while highly likely, is not 100% guaranteed. So if you are denied entry by Thai Immigration because you do not have a return ticket within 60 days, the airline would be responsible for flying you back home. That is an expense they do not wish to incur.
I have no doubt that some readers of this forum will testify that they have never had a return ticket and have encountered no problems with either the airline or Thai Immigration, but the question for you is: "Do you want to take that risk?" (My testimony is that I have been checked by the airlines before boarding several times.)
Has this been mention on here before?
https://padlet.com/electrifiedseal/electric-seal-idea-board-f8ymc7vlalfx95tn
I very much like the idea to have the ability to make suggestion for improvements, BYD has proven in the past to listen and to make an effort, the more participants, the stronger the impact!
Let's give 'em heck! (in a positive spirit)
All credit to Andrew Stiles at the Free Beacon.
https://freebeacon.com/satire/exclusive-personal-diary-of-usaid-staffer-reveals-apocalyptic-suffering-at-beleaguered-agency/
Ultimately it is the fault of the Thai government that have failed to make any enforceable laws regarding dog attacks and soi dog packs . Owners of dogs that cause injury to people should be penalized ( jailed and fined ) . Dog owners should keep their dogs within their property and not allowed to roam the streets . Thailand needs a dog cull and that includes any dog on the streets , be it owned or not . Cambodia , another Buddhist country does not suffer from uncontrolled dogs .
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now