Popular Post snoop1130 Posted Monday at 09:11 AM Popular Post Posted Monday at 09:11 AM Flooding in Bangkok | Photo via Bangkok Post/Somchai Poomlard A proposal to move Thailand's capital from Bangkok to Nakhon Ratchasima has sparked debate, as a government study highlights the high costs and complexity of such a project. The Interior Ministry reported that relocating the capital would require a significant budget and a public referendum. This suggestion came from Patchara Jantararuangtong, a member of the Pheu Thai Party, during a parliamentary session on October 12, 2023. Opposition to the move points at strengthening infrastructure in Bangkok and nearby areas, which are at risk of sinking. On November 28, 2023, the Cabinet tasked the Interior Ministry with exploring two options: moving the capital or building a barrier to protect Bangkok. The Cabinet reviewed these findings on February 4, 2024. Experts agree that any decision would need a comprehensive impact assessment, considering how businesses, jobs, and daily life might be affected. The study recommends building a sea barrier or setting up regional centers to reduce the pressure on Bangkok's central agencies. It also evaluated infrastructure in Nakhon Ratchasima, focusing on its roads and high-speed rail links to other regions. Further research on water resources is crucial for sustainable and eco-friendly development. The study also suggests examining capital relocations in other countries for more insights. State officials are seeking funding to assess the impact of sea level rise on the Chao Phraya River and explore long-term solutions. -- 2025-02-10 1 1 3 8
Popular Post timendres Posted Monday at 09:15 AM Popular Post Posted Monday at 09:15 AM 3 minutes ago, snoop1130 said: On November 28, 2023, the Cabinet tasked the Interior Ministry with exploring two options: moving the capital or building a barrier to protect Bangkok. November 28, 2053 -- Thai government considers moving capital from Bangkok to Nakhon Ratchasima. Ministry of Interior tasked with exploring... 2 1 1 1 9 2
Popular Post TimBKK Posted Monday at 09:21 AM Popular Post Posted Monday at 09:21 AM It’s already been relocated, to Beijing. 4 3 3 49 2
blaze master Posted Monday at 09:23 AM Posted Monday at 09:23 AM New Orleans is sinking man and I don't wanna swim. 4 1
Popular Post JoePai Posted Monday at 09:42 AM Popular Post Posted Monday at 09:42 AM 18 minutes ago, blaze master said: New Orleans is sinking man and I don't wanna swim. Please note : New Orleans is in a different country 1 1 19
Popular Post blaze master Posted Monday at 12:12 PM Popular Post Posted Monday at 12:12 PM 2 hours ago, JoePai said: Please note : New Orleans is in a different country Really ? You learn something new every day I guess. Thanks for that bit of info. 3 10
Popular Post daveAustin Posted Monday at 03:27 PM Popular Post Posted Monday at 03:27 PM ^^^ Well, this is a Thai forum after all. Hardly relative. Thais probably care as much about what happens in Cajun country as the latter do Thais. Not a biggie, many places have tiny nominal capitals... just shift government house and irrelevant politicians (all of them), albeit Bkk will still need saving. It was always a lost cause when what's his name relocated to a river delta from Ayuthaya in the 1700s. Guess they never envisaged such expansion. 2 1
Popular Post lordgrinz Posted Monday at 03:32 PM Popular Post Posted Monday at 03:32 PM Most of the rich Elites live in the lowest-lying areas, so you'll get to watch them squirm first if Bangkok goes underwater. 1 3
Popular Post 3NUMBAS Posted Monday at 03:59 PM Popular Post Posted Monday at 03:59 PM They don’t have any choice ,one day in the future the condos will become high level chiken farms and it will be too late to move 1 3
Popular Post connda Posted Monday at 04:32 PM Popular Post Posted Monday at 04:32 PM Move back to Ayutthaya. 3 1
Popular Post connda Posted Monday at 04:33 PM Popular Post Posted Monday at 04:33 PM Fyi, I've driven though that much water in Korat back in the day. Korat floods too. 4
Popular Post redwood1 Posted Monday at 05:03 PM Popular Post Posted Monday at 05:03 PM Moving capitals seems to be a very fashionable thing to do these days, lots of countries are doing it or talking of doing it..... Moving a capital has many purposes.... First you can be sure the new capital will be a smart city....Very highly controlled with mass surveillance every where....Which is the main purpose of moving a capital..... Also insiders will be making a fortune with buying cheap land ahead of the move...Also loads of fat construction contracts for all for the right people with plenty of nice kickbacks for lawmakers.... Plus lawmakers do love shinny new things, payed for by the public.... 3 2 8
Popular Post SingAPorn Posted Monday at 06:36 PM Popular Post Posted Monday at 06:36 PM Let them move it anyplace it will still remain cheaper and better then Hua Hin where foreigners get cheated on a 24 hour basis either by workers, contractors, restaurants...you name it. Most bank staff are very rude with foreigners lately and this feeling was never there before. Foreigners are really not considered in Hua Hin compared to other cities in Thailand with amazing and wonderful services, prices and people. The general feeling in Hua Hin is that a foreigner is mainly wanted for their money. Of course never can generalise but if you have a house, and you have to deal with those contractors, workers, sub contractors...... you'll get lied, cheated like no other place on earth or even in Thailand. Prices are getting close to those in the west and that too for work so poorly done that even a 15 year old would do better in Bangkok or Pattaya area. So move the capital if you must, but definately not to Hua Hin. 14 3 1 6 1
blaze master Posted Monday at 09:16 PM Posted Monday at 09:16 PM 5 hours ago, daveAustin said: ^^^ Well, this is a Thai forum after all. Hardly relative. Thais probably care as much about what happens in Cajun country as the latter do Thais. Not a biggie, many places have tiny nominal capitals... just shift government house and irrelevant politicians (all of them), albeit Bkk will still need saving. It was always a lost cause when what's his name relocated to a river delta from Ayuthaya in the 1700s. Guess they never envisaged such expansion. Clearly none of you know the hip. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LAZUsCONjIQ&pp=ygUlbmV3IG9ybGVhbnMgaXMgc2lua2luZyB0cmFnaWNhbGx5IGhpcA%3D%3D 5
Popular Post save the frogs Posted Monday at 09:21 PM Popular Post Posted Monday at 09:21 PM 4 minutes ago, blaze master said: Clearly none of you know the hip. are you from canada? no one outside canada has ever heard of that band. there was a canadian guy on here who was constantly referencing this band and got offended when i told him that. 5
kwilco Posted Monday at 09:32 PM Posted Monday at 09:32 PM 12 hours ago, snoop1130 said: Flooding in Bangkok | Photo via Bangkok Post/Somchai Poomlard A proposal to move Thailand's capital from Bangkok to Nakhon Ratchasima has sparked debate, as a government study highlights the high costs and complexity of such a project. The Interior Ministry reported that relocating the capital would require a significant budget and a public referendum. This suggestion came from Patchara Jantararuangtong, a member of the Pheu Thai Party, during a parliamentary session on October 12, 2023. Opposition to the move points at strengthening infrastructure in Bangkok and nearby areas, which are at risk of sinking. On November 28, 2023, the Cabinet tasked the Interior Ministry with exploring two options: moving the capital or building a barrier to protect Bangkok. The Cabinet reviewed these findings on February 4, 2024. Experts agree that any decision would need a comprehensive impact assessment, considering how businesses, jobs, and daily life might be affected. The study recommends building a sea barrier or setting up regional centers to reduce the pressure on Bangkok's central agencies. It also evaluated infrastructure in Nakhon Ratchasima, focusing on its roads and high-speed rail links to other regions. Further research on water resources is crucial for sustainable and eco-friendly development. The study also suggests examining capital relocations in other countries for more insights. State officials are seeking funding to assess the impact of sea level rise on the Chao Phraya River and explore long-term solutions. -- 2025-02-10 THis is usually the choice of militaristic governments and dictatorships.... 2 1 2
hotchilli Posted Monday at 09:40 PM Posted Monday at 09:40 PM 12 hours ago, snoop1130 said: the Cabinet tasked the Interior Ministry with exploring two options: moving the capital or building a barrier to protect Bangkok. They will opt for option two which will prove utterly useless 2
Popular Post Kiwiken Posted Monday at 09:48 PM Popular Post Posted Monday at 09:48 PM Moving the Capital will never be cheaper than now. Bangkok was built on a flood plain. brazil did it and other Countries will face the same dilemma. A planned well laid out expansion of Korat could work. Done haphazardly it will just become Bangkok mark2 2 1 2
Kasset Tak Posted Monday at 09:52 PM Posted Monday at 09:52 PM 12 minutes ago, kwilco said: THis is usually the choice of militaristic governments and dictatorships.... This is not like in Myanmar as the problem is that Bangkok is sinking, while the sea level is rising... and if you are right, then look at the US that have had 9 cities serve as capitals... 1
Popular Post blazes Posted Monday at 09:56 PM Popular Post Posted Monday at 09:56 PM Could ask the Dutch for advice -- they've been keeping the sea at bay for centuries. Ah,but I forgot....foreigners know nothing.... 3 1 1 4 2
blaze master Posted Monday at 10:02 PM Posted Monday at 10:02 PM 40 minutes ago, save the frogs said: are you from canada? no one outside canada has ever heard of that band. there was a canadian guy on here who was constantly referencing this band and got offended when i told him that. I am. Yes I know. The song still rocks pretty hard. Did he tell you he was sorry ? 1 2
Popular Post Joe Boy Walton Posted Monday at 10:08 PM Popular Post Posted Monday at 10:08 PM 12 hours ago, snoop1130 said: This suggestion came from Patchara Jantararuangtong, a member of the Pheu Thai Party, during a parliamentary session on October 12, 2023. I wonder who owns the land in Nakhon Ratchasima? 1 2 3 3
Popular Post renaissanc Posted Monday at 10:20 PM Popular Post Posted Monday at 10:20 PM 3 hours ago, SingAPorn said: Let them move it anyplace it will still remain cheaper and better then Hua Hin where foreigners get cheated on a 24 hour basis either by workers, contractors, restaurants...you name it. Most bank staff are very rude with foreigners lately and this feeling was never there before. Foreigners are really not considered in Hua Hin compared to other cities in Thailand with amazing and wonderful services, prices and people. The general feeling in Hua Hin is that a foreigner is mainly wanted for their money. Of course never can generalise but if you have a house, and you have to deal with those contractors, workers, sub contractors...... you'll get lied, cheated like no other place on earth or even in Thailand. Prices are getting close to those in the west and that too for work so poorly done that even a 15 year old would do better in Bangkok or Pattaya area. So move the capital if you must, but definately not to Hua Hin. My daughter has just backed out of a pool villa housing project in Hua Hin. The project increased the house's price by 500,000 baht at the contract-signing stage. We said "No, thank you. Bye, bye!" 5 1 1
Popular Post HHSAM Posted Monday at 10:30 PM Popular Post Posted Monday at 10:30 PM 3 hours ago, SingAPorn said: Let them move it anyplace it will still remain cheaper and better then Hua Hin where foreigners get cheated on a 24 hour basis either by workers, contractors, restaurants...you name it. Most bank staff are very rude with foreigners lately and this feeling was never there before. Foreigners are really not considered in Hua Hin compared to other cities in Thailand with amazing and wonderful services, prices and people. The general feeling in Hua Hin is that a foreigner is mainly wanted for their money. Of course never can generalise but if you have a house, and you have to deal with those contractors, workers, sub contractors...... you'll get lied, cheated like no other place on earth or even in Thailand. Prices are getting close to those in the west and that too for work so poorly done that even a 15 year old would do better in Bangkok or Pattaya area. So move the capital if you must, but definately not to Hua Hin. You should leave Hua Hin and go to one of the cities with amazing and wonderful service, prices and people. All bitter and twisted up. 1 1 2
Popular Post bkk6060 Posted Monday at 10:35 PM Popular Post Posted Monday at 10:35 PM They will never move it. And, no way Hua Hin. Also, I find HH one of the better places in the country to live, for service and friendly people. Much better then Pattaya or Bangkok. 1 1 1 3
Popular Post fredwiggy Posted Monday at 10:39 PM Popular Post Posted Monday at 10:39 PM 1 hour ago, save the frogs said: are you from canada? no one outside canada has ever heard of that band. there was a canadian guy on here who was constantly referencing this band and got offended when i told him that. They were popular soon after they came out all over the US. Americans are very much into Canadian music, as Rush,April Wine, Triumph, BTO, Loverboy, Guess Who, Steppenwolf, Helix, Mahogany Rush, Red Rider, The Kings and many others can attest. Of course that might have been sarcasm on your part. 3
kwilco Posted Monday at 10:54 PM Posted Monday at 10:54 PM 1 hour ago, Kasset Tak said: This is not like in Myanmar as the problem is that Bangkok is sinking, while the sea level is rising... and if you are right, then look at the US that have had 9 cities serve as capitals... Excuses - the Dutch can live below sea level - if they wanted to extend the whole city then that would be different - but they want to build a capital and military head. This was an idea that came from the military - it is trying to extract the government machine from the chaos of an open city to a place where it can be more powerful. 1
Popular Post watchcat Posted Monday at 11:00 PM Popular Post Posted Monday at 11:00 PM 21 minutes ago, bkk6060 said: They will never move it. Why not wait until China takes over the country, let them pay for the move. 1 1 5
Popular Post spidermike007 Posted Monday at 11:05 PM Popular Post Posted Monday at 11:05 PM Any move to alleviate congestion in Bangkok would be a good thing. Getting rid of those obnoxious 7 car convoys would be too. And a Bangkok without the political creeps would be more pleasant. Sounds like a great plan to me. 1 3 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now